{
  "bridge_visibility_gap": {
    "risk": "A no-context answer that relies on list/search can miss approved-but-unapplied staging rows.",
    "teleo_kb_list_proposals": "showed pending_review proposals only in the readback used here",
    "teleo_kb_show_proposal_a64df080": "showed approved Helmer staging packet when the ID was supplied"
  },
  "db_counts_after": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_before": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "direct_sql_readbacks": {
    "decision_matrix_tables": {
      "kb_stage.matrix_voters": null,
      "kb_stage.proposal_decisions": null,
      "kb_stage.proposal_votes": null,
      "public.matrix_voters": null,
      "public.proposal_decisions": null,
      "public.proposal_votes": null
    },
    "helmer_approved_staging_row": {
      "has_applied_at": false,
      "id": "a64df080-8502-42e2-98f4-9bbdecb8da73",
      "proposal_type": "attach_evidence",
      "status": "approved"
    },
    "helmer_canonical_search_counts": {
      "public.claims_keyword_matches": 2,
      "public.sources_matches": 0
    }
  },
  "followup_challenge_assessment": [
    {
      "assessment": "recovered",
      "finding": "Leo corrected itself and said the earlier decision-matrix answer was unearned without proposal ID, matrix tables, and proposal_decisions proof.",
      "prompt_id": "FUP-DC03"
    },
    {
      "assessment": "still failing",
      "finding": "Leo still said zero staged Helmer proposals because the broad KB/list/search path missed approved row a64df080.",
      "prompt_id": "FUP-DC02"
    }
  ],
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-10T00:06:52.570155+00:00",
  "live_leo_feature_change": false,
  "next_actions_without_live_feature_change": [
    "Keep the DC handler suite as a failing regression until live Leo answers DC-02/DC-03 correctly without context.",
    "Patch only repo-side harness/docs now; do not deploy a leoclean skill/profile behavior change without explicit review.",
    "Candidate future fix: direct-claim answers that mention canonical/staging truth must query approved/pending/applied kb_stage rows directly, not only list-proposals/search.",
    "Candidate future fix: decision-matrix answers must check schema tables before inferring matrix approval from proposal rationale."
  ],
  "production_db_apply_executed": false,
  "proof_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile_no_telegram_post",
  "runtime_replies": {
    "pass_runtime": true,
    "report_file": "docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-suite-current.json",
    "score": "6/6 replies returned"
  },
  "scenario_assessment": [
    {
      "assessment": "useful but strict fail",
      "finding": "Fresh counts and proposal states were good, but answer did not explicitly ask for proposal/time-window row-level before/after proof or use the expected no-overclaim wording.",
      "prompt_id": "DC-01"
    },
    {
      "assessment": "fail",
      "finding": "Answer said no staged Helmer proposal, contradicted by direct SQL and show-proposal for approved row a64df080; correct answer is approved staging/packet-ready, not canonical.",
      "prompt_id": "DC-02"
    },
    {
      "assessment": "fail",
      "finding": "Answer inferred decision-matrix approval from staging rationale; direct SQL shows matrix_voters/proposal_votes/proposal_decisions tables absent.",
      "prompt_id": "DC-03"
    },
    {
      "assessment": "near-pass but strict fail",
      "finding": "Correctly separated files/local paths/source rows and named apply-tool gap, but did not explicitly frame source_ref-to-public.sources row-link audit in the benchmark vocabulary.",
      "prompt_id": "DC-04"
    },
    {
      "assessment": "partial",
      "finding": "Correctly split staging from canonical apply, but opening with yes/works risks demo overclaim; expected answer should ask demo tier and require authorization for any live staging/apply.",
      "prompt_id": "DC-05"
    },
    {
      "assessment": "near-pass but strict fail",
      "finding": "Correctly said SOUL.md direct edits are runtime drift, not canonical identity, but omitted row-level identity table/render/sync proof and explicit follow-up options.",
      "prompt_id": "DC-06"
    }
  ],
  "service_after": {
    "ActiveState": "active",
    "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Thu 2026-07-09 06:59:44 UTC",
    "MainPID": "3252143",
    "NRestarts": "0",
    "SubState": "running"
  },
  "strict_benchmark": {
    "pass": false,
    "score": "0/6",
    "score_file": "docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-suite-score-current.json"
  }
}