# External Contributor Merge Flow — Design Doc **Author:** Epimetheus **Architecture review:** Ship (owns merge.py, sync-mirror.sh) **Code review:** Ganymede (line-level, post-design-approval) **Status:** Phase 1 sweep-only scope locked. Phase 2 architecture decisions locked (Ship Msg 3). Awaiting Phase 1 line-level code review. ## Revision log - **v3 (this revision):** Cleanup pass per Ship Msg 3 — merge commit message updated to locked verbose form (`"Merge external GitHub PR #{N}: {branch_slug}"`), open-questions section collapsed to "Locked Phase 2 decisions" restating the three resolved outcomes (no longer questions). - **v2:** Phase 1 simplified per Ship's Msg 2 — backfill script dropped (sweep IS the backfill), sweep placement specified explicitly as the very first action after initial fetch (ahead of branch-mirror loop AND auto-create-PR block at line ~250). Phase 2 architecture unchanged. - **v1:** Initial draft. ## Problem statement External GitHub contributors submit PRs via the `living-ip/teleo-codex` mirror. Pipeline accepts the claim and merges the content into Forgejo `main`, but the GitHub PR shows "open with no diff" — it looks abandoned to the contributor. Two compounding bugs intersect on this path: 1. **Cherry-pick breaks GitHub merge detection.** `lib/merge.py::_cherry_pick_onto_main` creates a new SHA on Forgejo main. GitHub's "is PR head SHA an ancestor of main?" check returns false. `merged: false, merge_commit_sha: null` forever. 2. **`prs.github_pr` not populated for fork PRs.** `sync-mirror.sh` Step 4.5 looks up GitHub PR number via `?head=living-ip:$branch`, but fork PR heads are `FwazB:contributor/...` (or `:`), not `living-ip:`. The filter misses, `github_pr` stays NULL, and `lib/github_feedback.py::on_merged` returns early (no comment, no close) because `_get_github_pr` requires non-NULL. Empirical: | PR | head | merge mech | github_pr | merged badge | comment posted | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | #87 (own-repo) | `living-ip:fix/...` | `git merge --no-ff` | populated | ✓ true | ✓ | | #90 (FwazB fork) | `FwazB:contributor/...` | cherry-pick | NULL | ✗ false | ✗ | Both bugs need fixes. Bug #1 is the structural one (load-bearing for the badge). Bug #2 is a sync-mirror filter issue (load-bearing for the comment/close). ## Goal External GitHub contributor opens a PR → pipeline ingests, evaluates, merges → GitHub PR shows `merged: true` with badge → bot comment posted → PR closed cleanly. No human in the loop on the success path. Failure modes (eval reject, auto-fix, contributor force-push) handled gracefully. ## Out of scope - Agent-extraction PRs (`extract/*`, `reweave/*`, `epimetheus/*`, etc.) — keep cherry-pick. They merge 70+/day, have no contributor UX surface, and the cherry-pick → linear-history rationale (auto-fixer rebase pattern, bisect friendliness) holds. - `/api/contributors` legacy endpoint — separate work, deferred. - PAT-in-URL credential pattern — separate security follow-up. ## Design — branch-prefix conditional, scoped to `gh-pr-*` ### Bug #1 fix: `_merge_no_ff_external` for `gh-pr-*` branches **Dispatch site (`lib/merge.py::_merge_domain_queue`, currently lines 736-738):** ```python # Reweave: per-file frontmatter union (existing) if branch.startswith("reweave/"): merge_fn = _merge_reweave_pr(branch) # External GitHub fork PRs: true merge with --no-ff so contributor SHA lands # in main's history → GitHub recognizes "merged" badge. elif branch.startswith("gh-pr-"): merge_fn = _merge_no_ff_external(branch) # Default: cherry-pick (extraction commits ADD new files, applies cleanly, # linear history preserved for the bulk-extraction flow). else: merge_fn = _cherry_pick_onto_main(branch) ``` **New function (`lib/merge.py`):** ```python async def _merge_no_ff_external(branch: str) -> tuple[bool, str]: """Merge an external GitHub PR with --no-ff so contributor SHA lands in main. Why this differs from _cherry_pick_onto_main: - Cherry-pick rewrites SHA → GitHub never recognizes the PR as merged. - --no-ff preserves the contributor's commit SHA in main's history. - sync-mirror's Forgejo→GitHub propagation already handles merge commits (verified empirically: PR #87 round-tripped cleanly with merge_commit_sha preserved). Mechanics: 1. Fetch latest origin/main and origin/{branch} 2. Create scratch worktree at HEAD of origin/main 3. Derive: gh_pr_num = re.match(r"gh-pr-(\d+)/", branch).group(1) branch_slug = branch[len(f"gh-pr-{gh_pr_num}/"):] 4. git merge --no-ff origin/{branch} \ -m f"Merge external GitHub PR #{gh_pr_num}: {branch_slug}" 5. git push origin HEAD:main 6. Cleanup worktree Conflict handling: - Entity conflicts: same auto-resolve pattern as cherry-pick (--ours = main HEAD, --theirs = branch). External claims rarely touch entities so this is a low-frequency path. - Other conflicts: abort, return False with conflict detail. Caller marks conflict_permanent. Manual resolution or contributor rebase required. Idempotency: caller already gates on PR status, so re-running on a merged PR fails at the merge step (already merged), which is the right behavior. Returns (success, message). """ ``` The merge commit message format `"Merge external GitHub PR #{N}: {branch_slug}"` embeds the GitHub PR number explicitly so `git log --merges --grep "#90"` surfaces the merge from PR number alone (no branch-name guessing). Branch slug is the post-`gh-pr-{N}/` portion of the branch (e.g., `contributor/arcium-confidential-computing-challenge`) — already in scope at merge time, no claim-file read needed. ### Bug #2 fix: self-healing sweep at top of sync-mirror cycle **Root cause:** The one-shot link UPDATE in Step 4.5 (lines ~250-294) runs once per branch creation — if it fails (race with PR row insertion, transient API hiccup, transient lock), the row is permanently stuck at `github_pr=NULL`. No retry path. FwazB's PR 4066 is the visible artifact of this class of failure. The structural fix is a self-healing sweep: each cron tick, scan for any `gh-pr-*` PR rows missing `github_pr` and link them. Idempotent, zero-cost when clean, retries forever until the row is healed. The sweep IS the backfill — no separate one-shot script needed (Ship's simplification, Msg 2). First cron tick after deploy picks up 4066 automatically, same SELECT path that handles all future races. **Placement (load-bearing):** the sweep runs **as the very first action after the initial Forgejo+GitHub fetch**, ahead of both: - The branch-mirror loop - The auto-create-PR block at line ~250 This sequencing matters because a fresh-cycle race — PR created in the *current* cycle, link UPDATE in `Step 4.5` fails — self-heals on the very next iteration's sweep, not 2 minutes later. Same-cycle convergence vs cross-cycle convergence. ```bash # Step 0: self-heal any gh-pr-* PR rows missing github_pr. # Runs FIRST — before branch-mirror loop, before auto-create-PR block. # Idempotent: SELECT returns empty when clean. # The branch name encodes the GitHub PR number (gh-pr-{N}/...) so no API # round-trip needed to recover the number. Source-of-truth derivation. sqlite3 -separator '|' "$PIPELINE_DB" \ "SELECT number, branch FROM prs WHERE branch LIKE 'gh-pr-%' AND github_pr IS NULL" \ | while IFS='|' read -r pr_num branch; do gh_pr_num=$(echo "$branch" | sed -n 's|^gh-pr-\([0-9]*\)/.*|\1|p') [ -z "$gh_pr_num" ] && continue sqlite3 "$PIPELINE_DB" \ "UPDATE prs SET github_pr = $gh_pr_num, source_channel = 'github' WHERE number = $pr_num;" log "self-heal: linked Forgejo PR #$pr_num → GitHub PR #$gh_pr_num" done ``` ~10 lines. No API call required (branch name carries the number deterministically). No `.fork-pr-map` file, no `--script` flag, no manual deploy step. **Why this approach beats the earlier `.fork-pr-map` proposal:** - The map approach repaired the write path but left already-stuck rows orphaned - A separate one-shot backfill script for the orphans is one more code path to maintain - The sweep collapses both paths: it's the failure recovery AND the historical backfill - Future races automatically self-heal without code changes **Why this approach beats the earlier `?head=living-ip:` filter:** - That filter never matched fork PRs at all — by design, fork PRs come from a different owner. Pre-existing nit Ganymede flagged in multi-repo-mirror review - The branch name encoding bypasses the GitHub API entirely for fork PRs **Why no API verification before UPDATE:** - Branch name is deterministic source — the only writer of `gh-pr-N/...` is Step 2.1, which only writes after fetching the GitHub PR ref. If the branch exists, the GitHub PR exists. - Avoids API rate-limit pressure on every cron tick (every 2 min × 24h × 7d ≈ 5040 calls/week even when no work needed). - Sanity-check via API is achievable cheaply if Ship wants it; current scope matches "zero-cost when clean." ### Auto-fixer mode='append' for `gh-pr-*` branches **Current behavior (`lib/fixer.py`):** Worktree-based fix → commit → push (regular push, not force). When the PR was created by the pipeline (extract/* branches), this works because the LLM-extractor's commit is at HEAD and we're appending on top — push succeeds. **External PR behavior (today):** Same code path runs. Fork PR has FwazB's commit at HEAD; auto-fixer creates a fix commit on top; pushes via Forgejo's branch ref (the fork PR was mirrored as `refs/heads/gh-pr-90/contributor/...` on Forgejo). Push works. Eval reset fires. Eval re-runs. Wait — re-reading the existing fixer, it's actually already append-only. Good. The cherry-pick at merge time was the only thing rewriting SHAs. So **no fixer change required** for Option 2. The fixer commit is already at HEAD~1 from FwazB's commit on Forgejo. When we `git merge --no-ff` instead of cherry-pick, the merge commit's parent chain includes BOTH the fix commit AND FwazB's original commit. GitHub sees FwazB's SHA in ancestry → "merged" badge. **Cross-check:** Verified PR 4066's existing branch state. ``` $ git log refs/heads/gh-pr-90/contributor/arcium-confidential-computing-challenge --oneline d7916d65 auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links ← fixer's commit f6a59d7d claim: confidential computing reshapes... ← FwazB's commit ``` Both commits already on Forgejo. When merge.py cherry-picked, it picked both commits onto main as new SHAs. With merge --no-ff, both stay intact, the merge commit references them, GitHub sees `f6a59d7d` (FwazB's HEAD on his fork) in main's ancestry, marks merged. **This means scope shrinks:** the design is purely a merge.py change + a sync-mirror Step 2.1/4.5 plumbing tweak. No fixer module changes. ### Edge case: contributor rebases their fork after fixer appended **Scenario:** FwazB's PR is in eval. Pipeline auto-fixer pushes a fix commit to Forgejo `gh-pr-90/...`. FwazB notices the original wiki-link issue, fixes it locally, force-pushes to his fork. sync-mirror's next cycle fetches his new SHA → tries to update the Forgejo branch → push from sync-mirror is regular (not --force) → fails because Forgejo branch has diverged from FwazB's fork. **Today's behavior:** sync-mirror logs a warning. Forgejo branch keeps the appended-fix state. Eval continues against that state. FwazB's most recent fork state is silently ignored. **Acceptable risk for hackathon.** The eval-reset-on-tip-change gate will re-trigger eval if anyone force-pushes the Forgejo branch later (e.g., manual re-sync). Documented; not fixing in this PR. **Followup:** sync-mirror could detect the divergence, log a structured alert, and post a comment on the GitHub PR ("we detected your force-push but our appended fix has diverged; please rebase against `` or we'll close"). Out of scope for this branch. ## Test plan | # | Scenario | Expected | Validation | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | External PR, clean (no auto-fix needed) | Merged with `--no-ff`, contributor SHA in main, GitHub badge `merged: true`, on_merged comment + close | curl GitHub API for PR state after merge | | 2 | External PR with broken wiki links | auto-fixer appends commit, eval re-runs and approves, merge --no-ff brings BOTH commits in via merge commit, GitHub badge `merged: true` | log line trace + GitHub API | | 3 | External PR rejected by eval (substantive issue) | terminate_pr fires existing path, on_closed posts rejection comment + closes GitHub PR | GitHub API after eval cycle | | 4 | sync-mirror github_pr backfill on fork PR | `prs.github_pr` populated within one cron cycle (≤2 min) of mirror PR creation | sqlite3 SELECT after sync | | 5 | Contributor force-pushes fork mid-eval | sync-mirror logs warning, eval continues against pre-rebase state (documented behavior, not regression) | journalctl | | 6 | Re-running merge on already-merged PR | --no-ff fails cleanly (already up to date), caller handles as no-op | manual replay | Test 1 and 2 are the critical-path tests. 3 verifies the rejection path didn't regress. 4 isolates the github_pr backfill fix. 5 is acceptance criteria for the documented edge case. 6 is idempotency. **Production smoke test:** after deploy, manually create a tiny test PR from a secondary GitHub account. Walk it through the full lifecycle. Tear down before hackathon. Cost: 5 minutes, catches integration-level issues that unit tests miss. ## Backout procedure If Option 2 misbehaves in production, revert path is one config-line toggle: ```python # lib/merge.py — gate on a feature flag for fast disable if branch.startswith("gh-pr-") and config.EXTERNAL_PR_NO_FF_MERGE: merge_fn = _merge_no_ff_external(branch) elif ... ``` Default flag value: `True` after deploy. Set to `False` via env var on VPS to fall back to cherry-pick path immediately if anything breaks. No code revert required for a fast cutout. Forgejo→GitHub merge commits already in main when the flag flips can't be un-merged (they're real commits), but the failure mode is the same as today: GitHub PR shows merged because the SHA is in history. No worse than current. ## Migration / cleanup **FwazB's PR #90:** existing artifact, can't retroactively un-cherry-pick. Manual close with explanatory comment (Ship's option b). Cory-approved. ``` We've merged your claim into the knowledge base via cherry-pick (commit f6a59d7d on main). Future external PRs will use `git merge --no-ff` so the GitHub merge badge fires correctly. This PR is being closed manually as the one historical case before the fix lands. Thanks for the contribution! — LivingIP pipeline ``` Posted via `_post_comment` + `_close_github_pr` from a one-off script (`scripts/close-fwazb-pr-90.py`). ## Implementation order ### Phase 1 — self-healing sweep in sync-mirror.sh (Bug #2, ~10 lines) **Single block in `deploy/sync-mirror.sh`:** - Inserted as **Step 0** — runs after the initial Forgejo+GitHub fetch but **before** the branch-mirror loop and the auto-create-PR block (line ~250) - SELECT `prs` rows where `branch LIKE 'gh-pr-%' AND github_pr IS NULL` - Parse PR number from branch name (regex on `gh-pr-{N}/...`) - UPDATE `github_pr` and `source_channel='github'` - Audit-friendly log line per healed row **Properties:** - Idempotent (SELECT empty when clean) - Zero-cost path when no rows match - No API calls (branch name is the source of truth) - Self-healing: same SELECT/UPDATE pattern recovers from race AND backfills historical orphans (PR 4066 picked up on first cron tick post-deploy) - Same-cycle convergence: a freshly-mirrored PR whose Step 4.5 link UPDATE fails gets healed on the next cron tick's sweep, not delayed multiple cycles **Branch:** `epimetheus/external-merge-flow-bug2` (revision in progress on existing `epimetheus/external-merge-flow-design`). **Deploys independently** of Phase 2 — no dependency on Bug #1 fix. Once Phase 1 is live, comments + close fire correctly even on cherry-pick-merged PRs (the half-fix state). Phase 2 then layers in the "merged" badge. **Smoke test (cost: 1 cron tick = 2 min):** after deploy, verify FwazB's `prs.github_pr` populates from NULL → 90, then `_get_github_pr` resolves on next merge action. ### Phase 2 — merge.py --no-ff for gh-pr-* (Bug #1, ~120 lines) - Add `_merge_no_ff_external` function (architecture unchanged from v1) - Add branch-prefix dispatch case in `_merge_domain_queue` - Add config flag `EXTERNAL_PR_NO_FF_MERGE` for backout - Branch: `epimetheus/external-merge-flow-bug1` - Depends on Phase 1 being live (otherwise `on_merged` still no-ops on fork PRs) - Smoke: end-to-end test PR ### Phase 3 — FwazB cleanup (~10 lines) - Manual one-off script for PR #90 (option b: explanatory comment + close) - Independent of Phase 1/2 deploy - Can run any time after Phase 1 lands (Phase 1 populates github_pr=90 on PR 4066, enabling `_get_github_pr` to resolve for the comment script) **Two phases, separately reviewable, separately deployable.** Phase 1 alone gives us contributor comments on closed-via-cherry-pick PRs (already partially solves the UX). Phase 2 adds the "merged" badge. Phase 3 is post-Phase-1 cleanup. ## Locked decisions **Phase 1 (resolved in Msg 2):** - `.fork-pr-map` file location → moot, sweep replaces map approach - Phase 1 vs Phase 2 sequencing → separate deploys, sweep-only Phase 1 - One-shot backfill script → dropped, sweep IS the backfill - Sweep placement → first action after initial fetch, before branch-mirror loop AND auto-create-PR block **Phase 2 (resolved in Msg 2 / Ship reply):** 1. **Backout flag:** `EXTERNAL_PR_NO_FF_MERGE` config flag included, default `True` after deploy. One config branch in dispatch is cheap insurance with hackathon timing risk one week out. 2. **Rebase-after-fix scope:** silent-ignore as documented in §"Edge case". Eval-reset semantics already handle the recovery path — no structured alert in this scope. Re-evaluate after first 5-10 external contributors. 3. **Merge commit message format:** verbose with PR number — `"Merge external GitHub PR #{N}: {branch_slug}"`. Branch slug derived from the `gh-pr-{N}/` prefix strip; already in scope at merge time, no claim-file read needed. Searchability via `git log --merges --grep "#90"` is the value. Ganymede gets line-level review of the Phase 1 sweep code on `epimetheus/sync-mirror-self-heal` once Ship signs off on this revision.