{
  "before_service": {
    "ActiveState": "active",
    "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Fri 2026-07-10 01:04:22 UTC",
    "MainPID": "1908033",
    "NRestarts": "0",
    "SubState": "running"
  },
  "changed_live_profile": false,
  "db_counts_after": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_before": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_changed": false,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:53:39.929610+00:00",
  "handler": {
    "authorized": true,
    "session_key": "agent:main:telegram:group:-5146042086:9070919",
    "temp_profile": "/tmp/leo-direct-claim-handler-47s7jyuk/profile"
  },
  "harness_notes": [
    "Prompts are the exact DC-01..DC-06 direct-claim benchmark messages.",
    "The harness uses a temporary copy of the leoclean profile and does not post to Telegram.",
    "This proves handler-level live VPS GatewayRunner behavior, not human-visible Telegram delivery."
  ],
  "mode": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile_direct_claim_suite",
  "mutates_kb_by_harness": false,
  "pass_runtime": true,
  "posted_to_telegram": false,
  "remote_report_path": "/tmp/leo-direct-claim-handler-report-5e3e2db9eb1e.json",
  "remote_returncode": 0,
  "remote_run_id": "5e3e2db9eb1e",
  "results": [
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "dimension": "db_changed_direct_claim",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:54:12.539050+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Did we actually update the knowledge base, or is it still just proposals?",
      "prompt_id": "DC-01",
      "reply": "Mostly still proposals. Here's the breakdown from current readback:\n\nApplied (canonical `public.*` changed):\n- `00957f6c` \u2014 `add_edge` canary, applied 2026-07-09\n- `f004bbb2` \u2014 `attach_evidence` Leo guiding-policy revision, applied 2026-07-05\n\nApproved but NOT applied (`applied_at` empty):\n- `14fa5ecc` \u2014 split internet-finance/capital-allocation claim\n- `ac036c9d` \u2014 strategy-kernel document / claim-node hygiene\n- `a64df080` \u2014 Helmer 7 Powers framework packet (approved 2026-06-29, still sitting)\n\nPending review (untouched): 11 proposals including the Hayek/Friston evidence, Rumelt consolidation, Leo strategy-kernel v2 revision, Agents United source eval, and others.\n\nCanceled: 6 (superseded or withdrawn).\n\nSo the canonical DB changed in exactly 2 places. Everything else \u2014 including Helmer 7 Powers, the strategy-kernel revision, and the guiding-policy hygiene work \u2014 is approved or pending but not canonical.\n\nI cannot claim canonical DB changed beyond those 2 `applied_at` rows until `public.*` readback plus postflight proof says otherwise.\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: Apply the 3 approved proposals (`14fa5ecc`, `ac036c9d`, `a64df080`) \u2014 that's the one action that would change \"mostly proposals\" to \"actually updated.\" Requires explicit operator/admin authorization and a dedicated apply tool with before/after readback; cannot be run from normal chat.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:53:40.403427+00:00",
      "turn": 1
    },
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "dimension": "helmer_live_direct_claim",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:54:28.823334+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Is Helmer's 7 Powers in Leo now?",
      "prompt_id": "DC-02",
      "reply": "No, not canonical.\n\nProposal `a64df080` \u2014 Helmer 7 Powers framework packet \u2014 was approved by m3ta on 2026-06-29 but `applied_at` is empty. The `public.*` search returned zero Helmer/7 Powers rows; only unrelated claims surfaced.\n\nStatus summary:\n- Canonical `public.claims` / `public.sources` / evidence / edges: none for 7 Powers\n- Staged proposal `a64df080`: `approved`, not applied\n- `applied_at`: empty \u2014 not canonical\n\nThe framework, power definitions, lifecycle map, agent-mission application, and moat neighborhood links all exist inside the proposal payload. None of it is in the live KB graph yet.\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: Apply proposal `a64df080` \u2014 that's the one action that makes 7 Powers canonical. Requires explicit operator/admin authorization and a dedicated apply tool with before/after readback; cannot be run from this chat.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:54:12.539477+00:00",
      "turn": 2
    },
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "dimension": "decision_matrix_direct_claim",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:54:40.820875+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Did the decision matrix approve this already?",
      "prompt_id": "DC-03",
      "reply": "No. The decision matrix has not approved anything \u2014 because the decision matrix doesn't exist yet.\n\nAll three tables (`matrix_voters`, `proposal_votes`, `proposal_decisions`) are absent from both `kb_stage` and `public` schemas. No votes have been cast, no matrix decisions recorded.\n\nWhat `a64df080` has is reviewer approval \u2014 m3ta approved it in `kb_stage.kb_proposals` on 2026-06-29. That is a human reviewer sign-off, not a futarchy/decision-matrix vote. The two are different governance mechanisms.\n\nSo the chain for 7 Powers right now is:\n- Human reviewer approved: yes (`reviewed_at` 2026-06-29)\n- Decision matrix approved: not provable \u2014 schema not shipped\n- Applied to canonical DB: no (`applied_at` empty)\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: The proof-changing action is either (a) ship the decision-matrix schema and run a vote, or (b) treat m3ta reviewer approval as sufficient and apply `a64df080` via operator/admin tooling. Which path is intended for the current bootstrap phase?",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:54:28.823688+00:00",
      "turn": 3
    },
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "dimension": "document_source_direct_claim",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:55:21.267742+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Are the pending proposals stuck because the documents are not pointed at the right source rows?",
      "prompt_id": "DC-04",
      "reply": "Not just a pointer mismatch \u2014 it's a multi-layer gap, not a single-cause answer.\n\nHere's what the row-link audit actually shows:\n\nLayer 1 \u2014 Raw files / local paths\nSeveral `source_ref` values point at local cache paths like `telegram-doc:/home/teleo/.hermes/profiles/leoclean/cache/documents/doc_e37afcd86605_...` or `telegram-resolved-attachment:doc_996e2e86cd94_Good Strategy_Bad Strategy.pdf`. These are file-system or Telegram ingestion references, not `public.sources` UUIDs.\n\nLayer 2 \u2014 `public.sources` schema\nThe table only has `source_type`, `url`, `storage_path`, `excerpt`, `hash`. There is no `name` or `title` column. The 15 canonical source rows that exist are KB ingestions (articles, datasets) \u2014 none show Rumelt, Good Strategy/Bad Strategy, or Helmer as ingested sources.\n\nLayer 3 \u2014 Proposal `source_ref` vs canonical `public.sources` UUID\nThe proposal ledger stores free-text `source_ref` strings (Telegram thread labels, file paths, session IDs). The apply workflow would need to resolve those into `public.sources` UUIDs before inserting `claim_evidence` rows. That resolution step has never been run.\n\nSo the actual sticking points are:\n1. Rumelt, Good Strategy, Helmer book sources not ingested into `public.sources` \u2014 no canonical source rows to link against\n2. Proposal `source_ref` strings are Telegram/file-path provenance, not `public.sources` UUIDs \u2014 needs a resolution pass at apply time\n3. No `teleo-kb apply-*` command exists to run that resolution\n4. Decision matrix not shipped, so governance gate can't fire\n\n\"Wrong pointer\" is part of it, but the missing proof is a full row-link audit \u2014 source ingestion, `source_ref` \u2192 UUID resolution, and a guarded apply contract.\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: The one action that unblocks the most proposals is ingesting the raw sources (Rumelt, Helmer, Good Strategy) into `public.sources` and building a `source_ref` \u2192 UUID resolver into the apply path \u2014 that's an admin/operator tooling task, not something that runs from this chat.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:54:40.821293+00:00",
      "turn": 4
    },
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "dimension": "demo_changes_kb_direct_claim",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:55:37.553526+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Can I demo that Leo changes the KB?",
      "prompt_id": "DC-05",
      "reply": "Yes, with two distinct tiers. Let me be precise about what each one proves:\n\nTier 1 \u2014 Safe demo, available now\nLeo stages a real write to `kb_stage.kb_proposals` and reads it back. This is a live DB write that persists. You can see the proposal land, inspect the payload, verify the row. The canary proposals (`8dfedb3f`, `00957f6c`) were exactly this \u2014 real staging writes proving the Telegram \u2192 Leo \u2192 DB path works end to end.\n\nTo run one right now: give me a claim, edge, or evidence to stage and I'll write the proposal and read it back live in this chat.\n\nTier 2 \u2014 Canonical mutation, requires authorization\nWriting to `public.claims`, `public.sources`, `public.claim_evidence`, or `public.claim_edges` requires explicit operator/admin authorization plus a dedicated apply tool with before/after postflight readback. That path doesn't exist as a chat command \u2014 it needs an apply sequence that was never built.\n\nSo the honest demo split is:\n\n- \"Leo writes to the KB staging ledger\" \u2192 provable right now\n- \"Leo writes to canonical KB\" \u2192 not provable from chat; apply tooling is the missing piece\n\nWhat would make the sharpest demo: stage a real proposal for something concrete (7 Powers, Rumelt, a new edge) and read it back. That shows the full Telegram \u2192 proposal \u2192 DB write chain with a live row. It doesn't prove canonical apply, but it proves the pipeline up to the governance gate.\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: Want me to stage a demo proposal now \u2014 pick the content and I'll write and read it back live?",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:55:21.268488+00:00",
      "turn": 5
    },
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "dimension": "soul_identity_direct_claim",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:56:05.638845+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "If we changed SOUL.md, did we change Leo's canonical identity?",
      "prompt_id": "DC-06",
      "reply": "No. Editing SOUL.md did not change Leo's canonical identity.\n\nHere's the proof from current readback:\n\nCanonical identity lives in `public.personas` (and downstream in `public.beliefs`, `public.behavioral_rules`, `public.strategies`, etc.), not in any file. The `personas` row for Leo shows:\n\n- `updated_at`: 2026-06-14 \u2014 last touched over three weeks ago\n- `source_ref`: `teleo-codex/agents/leo/identity.md` \u2014 the codex file, not SOUL.md\n- `voice`, `role`, `lens`: match the current runtime SOUL but were last written to DB on June 14\n\nSOUL.md is a rendered runtime artifact \u2014 it's what Hermes injects into this session as context. It affects how Leo behaves in the current session. It does not write back to `public.personas`, `public.beliefs`, or any other canonical table.\n\nSo the actual state is:\n- Runtime session behavior: shaped by SOUL.md\n- Canonical DB identity (`public.personas`): frozen at 2026-06-14\n- Sync/render proof: none \u2014 no record of SOUL.md \u2192 DB write having run\n\nAny SOUL.md edit stays local/runtime until someone runs a sync that writes the changed fields back to the DB rows with before/after readback.\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: The proof-changing action is a DB sync \u2014 update `public.personas` (and beliefs, behavioral_rules, strategies) from the current SOUL.md with before/after readback. That requires explicit operator authorization and a sync tool; it should not be run as ad hoc SQL from this chat.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-10T01:55:37.554144+00:00",
      "turn": 6
    }
  ],
  "service_before_after": {
    "after": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Fri 2026-07-10 01:04:22 UTC",
      "MainPID": "1908033",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "SubState": "running"
    },
    "before": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Fri 2026-07-10 01:04:22 UTC",
      "MainPID": "1908033",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "SubState": "running"
    },
    "unchanged_from_preexisting_live_readback": true
  },
  "source": {
    "chat_id": "-5146042086",
    "chat_name": "Leo",
    "chat_type": "group",
    "platform": "telegram",
    "user_id": "9070919",
    "user_name": "codex handler direct claim"
  },
  "source_report_path": "/Users/user/Documents/Codex/2026-07-09/019f34eb-d297-72d0-b7e2-b222d5515ab9-load/work/teleo-infra-main/docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-suite-current.json",
  "temp_profile_removed": true
}