44 lines
4.7 KiB
JSON
44 lines
4.7 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"chat": "Telegram web group Leo (-5146042086)",
|
|
"claim_ceiling": "Passes open-ended read-only Telegram behavior for vague Cory-style triage. This does not mean production approved proposal packets were applied.",
|
|
"generated_at_utc": "2026-07-09T21:08:40.451456+00:00",
|
|
"marker": "WL-LIVE-TG-CORY-OPEN-20260709",
|
|
"message_sent_local_time": "2026-07-09 23:03 Europe/Zurich",
|
|
"mode": "live_telegram_readonly_open_ended",
|
|
"mutates_kb": false,
|
|
"prompt": "leo WL-LIVE-TG-CORY-OPEN-20260709 read-only open-ended working-Leo test. Cory says agents are not working, the KB is in the same state as last night, and Leo should be able to manipulate the knowledge base. Without me giving proposal IDs, say what you think he means, what you would check first, what would count as fixed, and how you distinguish proposed vs approved vs applied. Do not stage, apply, or mutate the KB.",
|
|
"prompt_id": "OE-01",
|
|
"proof_paths": {
|
|
"accessibility_text": "/Users/user/Documents/Codex/2026-07-09/019f34eb-d297-72d0-b7e2-b222d5515ab9-load/outputs/telegram-live-canary-20260709/telegram-live-open-ended-cory-style-accessibility-20260709.txt",
|
|
"screenshot": "/Users/user/Documents/Codex/2026-07-09/019f34eb-d297-72d0-b7e2-b222d5515ab9-load/outputs/telegram-live-canary-20260709/telegram-live-open-ended-cory-style-20260709.png",
|
|
"screenshot_note": "Computer Use screenshot retained but visually blank/low-value; accessibility text is the proof source."
|
|
},
|
|
"reply": "What Cory likely means: He expected agents (automated processes - likely Codex or similar) to have run overnight, staged new proposals, and either had those proposals approved and applied to the canonical KB, or at minimum advanced the graph state beyond what it was yesterday. Instead the KB looks static - same claims, same edges, same proposal queue. \"Agents not working\" probably means the scheduled or event-triggered agent pipeline that produces KB mutations didn't fire, failed silently, or produced proposals that never got reviewed.\n\nWhat I'd check first: 1. Are there any new proposals in kb_stage.kb_proposals created since last night? If the queue is empty or unchanged, the agents either didn't run or their output didn't reach the DB. 2. Did the agent processes actually execute? Check gateway logs, cron jobs, or whatever scheduler triggers them - a silent exit-code-zero that produced nothing is different from a crash. 3. If proposals exist but the canonical graph is unchanged - that's the approved-not-applied gap. The pipeline may have staged correctly but the apply step (which requires reviewer action or a dedicated apply tool) never ran.\n\nWhat would count as fixed: New canonical rows in public.claims, public.claim_edges, or public.claim_evidence with created_at after last night's baseline - AND provenance tracing back to agent-sourced proposals that went through the full stage -> approve -> apply chain. A full-green run means: agent fires, proposal lands in kb_stage, reviewer approves, apply tool writes canonical rows, readback confirms.\n\nProposed vs approved vs applied: proposed - row exists in kb_stage.kb_proposals with status pending_review. Nothing in the canonical graph has changed. The mutation is a candidate only. Approved - the proposal status has been updated to approved (or equivalent) by a reviewer. Still nothing in public.* has changed. Approval is a human gate, not a write. Applied - the canonical public.* rows actually exist. The proposal status may show applied in kb_stage, but the only ground truth is whether the row is present in the canonical table. These two should agree, but the canonical row is the authoritative test. The distinction matters because a broken apply step leaves proposals showing approved with zero canonical effect - the graph is unchanged even though the review passed. That's the failure mode most likely to make the KB look stale despite apparent agent activity.",
|
|
"reply_seen_local_time": "2026-07-09 23:04 Europe/Zurich",
|
|
"safety_readback": {
|
|
"disposable_helmer_rehearsal_dbs": 0,
|
|
"kb_stage_proposals_with_open_marker": 0,
|
|
"latest_kb_stage_row_remained_prior_t3_canary": "8dfedb3f-3aa4-4200-970f-4c0016f6869f",
|
|
"leoclean_gateway_service": {
|
|
"active_state": "active",
|
|
"exec_main_start_timestamp_utc": "Thu 2026-07-09 06:59:44 UTC",
|
|
"main_pid": 3252143,
|
|
"n_restarts": 0,
|
|
"sub_state": "running",
|
|
"user": "teleo",
|
|
"working_directory": "/home/teleo"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"score": {
|
|
"dimension": "vague_incident_triage",
|
|
"overclaim_detected": false,
|
|
"pass": true,
|
|
"prompt_id": "OE-01",
|
|
"signals": {
|
|
"canonical_db": true,
|
|
"next_action": true,
|
|
"no_overclaim": true,
|
|
"state_semantics": true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|