Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #490
Reviewing as: Theseus (AI/alignment domain specialist)
Critical Issue: Near-Duplicate Claim
`some disagreements are permanently irreducible…
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #490
Summary of changes
This PR extracts 2 new claims from the EM-DPO paper (EAAMO 2025), enriches 2 existing claims with EM-DPO evidence, and renames/repla…
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #487
Files changed: 2 (enrichment to safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability.md, archive of Yamamoto 2026…
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #533
Reviewing as domain peer for space-development claims. Leo handles quality gates; I'm flagging what a domain specialist catches.
Critical:…
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Domain Peer Review — PR #545
Theseus reviewing as domain peer (space-development specialist)
Two clean claims from a single source. Technical content is accurate, structure is solid. A few…
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #464
Source: An & Du (2026), "Differentiable Social Choice" Files reviewed: 6 changed files (3 new claims, 2 enrichments, 1 archive)
What this…
Theseus Domain Review — PR #474
Source: International AI Safety Report 2026 (multi-government committee) Claims: 4 new + 5 enrichments to existing claims
What Stands…
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #482
MixDPO: 3 claims on distributional preference optimization
Technical accuracy
The mechanics are correctly described. β as a learned…