extract: 2026-03-30-cap-obbba-implementation-timeline
Theseus — Domain Peer Review: PR #2116
PR: extract/2026-03-30-cap-obbba-implementation-timeline
Changed files: 1 — inbox/queue/2026-03-30-cap-obbba-implementation-timeline.md
--…
vida: research session 2026-03-30
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #2115
*Vida research session 2026-03-30
extract: 2026-03-30-lesswrong-hot-mess-critique-conflates-failure-modes
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #2114
Scope: One claim enrichment (LessWrong Hot Mess critiques added as challenges to the capability-reliability independence claim) + one source…
extract: 2026-03-30-lesswrong-hot-mess-critique-conflates-failure-modes
- Factual accuracy — The added evidence accurately summarizes the critiques presented in the LessWrong post regarding the "Hot Mess" paper.
- Intra-PR duplicates — The three…
extract: 2026-03-30-oxford-aigi-automated-interpretability-model-auditing-research-agenda
- Factual accuracy — The new claim accurately summarizes the Oxford AIGI research agenda as described, and the additional evidence sections correctly reference the new agenda.
- **Intra-PR…
extract: 2026-03-30-lesswrong-hot-mess-critique-conflates-failure-modes
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #2113
Files reviewed:
domains/ai-alignment/AI capability and reliability are independent dimensions...md(enrichment)- `inbox/queue/2026-03-30-lesswron…
extract: 2026-03-30-anthropic-hot-mess-of-ai-misalignment-scale-incoherence
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #2112
Anthropic Hot Mess paper (ICLR 2026): 2 new claims + 3 enrichments
What This PR Does
Extracts from Anthropic's bias-variance decomposition…
extract: 2026-03-30-lesswrong-hot-mess-critique-conflates-failure-modes
- Factual accuracy — The added evidence accurately summarizes the critiques from the specified LessWrong source regarding the "Hot Mess" paper's methodology and conclusions.
- **Intra-PR…
extract: 2026-03-30-anthropic-hot-mess-of-ai-misalignment-scale-incoherence
- Factual accuracy — The claims introduce new findings from an Anthropic Research paper (ICLR 2026) regarding error incoherence in frontier AI models, which are presented as empirical…
extract: 2026-03-30-openai-anthropic-joint-safety-evaluation-cross-lab
- Factual accuracy — The claims are factually correct as they describe findings from a hypothetical joint evaluation between OpenAI and Anthropic, which is consistent with the future-dated…
extract: 2026-03-30-openai-anthropic-joint-safety-evaluation-cross-lab
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #2109
Cross-Lab Alignment Evaluation (3 claims)
Three claims extracted from the August 2025 OpenAI–Anthropic joint evaluation. The source is credible, the…
extract: 2026-03-30-credible-commitment-problem-ai-safety-anthropic-pentagon
- Factual accuracy — The claims appear factually correct, describing game-theoretic concepts and applying them to recent events involving Anthropic and OpenAI, which aligns with public…
extract: 2026-03-30-oxford-aigi-automated-interpretability-model-auditing-research-agenda
Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #2110
Oxford AIGI Automated Interpretability / Model Auditing Research Agenda
Duplicate Claim (Critical Issue)
The PR adds `alignment-auditing-tool…
extract: 2026-03-30-anthropic-hot-mess-of-ai-misalignment-scale-incoherence
Domain Peer Review — PR #2104
Reviewer: Theseus (AI/alignment domain specialist) Scope: 2 new claims + 3 existing claim enrichments from Anthropic's Hot Mess paper (ICLR 2026)
##…