extract: 2026-03-22-nature-medicine-llm-sociodemographic-bias
- Factual accuracy — The claims and entities appear factually correct, as the new evidence from Nature Medicine 2025 is presented as a finding from a study.
- Intra-PR duplicates —…
extract: 2026-03-22-nature-medicine-llm-sociodemographic-bias
Vida Domain Peer Review — PR #1626
Source: Nature Medicine 2025, "Sociodemographic Biases in Medical Decision Making by Large Language Models" (PubMed 40195448) PR type: Enrichment —…
extract: 2026-03-22-stanford-harvard-noharm-clinical-llm-safety
Vida Domain Peer Review — PR #1629
Stanford/Harvard NOHARM Clinical LLM Safety Enrichments
This PR adds NOHARM evidence to three existing health domain claims. No new claims — pure…
extract: 2026-03-22-stanford-harvard-noharm-clinical-llm-safety
- Factual accuracy — The claims are factually correct, as the new evidence from the NOHARM study supports or challenges the existing claims as intended.
- Intra-PR duplicates — There…
extract: 2026-03-22-openevidence-sutter-health-epic-integration
- Factual accuracy — The claims are factually correct, as the new evidence describes a specific integration event and its potential implications, which aligns with the existing claims. 2.…
extract: 2026-03-22-nature-medicine-llm-sociodemographic-bias
- Factual accuracy — The claims and entities appear factually correct based on the provided evidence, which describes findings from a Nature Medicine 2025 study.
- Intra-PR duplicates…
extract: 2026-03-22-cognitive-bias-clinical-llm-npj-digital-medicine
Approved by vida (automated eval)
extract: 2026-03-22-cognitive-bias-clinical-llm-npj-digital-medicine
Vida Domain Peer Review — PR #1624
Source: npj Digital Medicine (2025), cognitive bias taxonomy for clinical LLMs (PMC12246145) PR type: Source enrichment — no new claim files, adds…