Auto-fix applied — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.
Auto-fix applied — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.
Rio's Domain Review
Technical Accuracy
All claims are factually grounded in the source material. The refund mechanism, raise amounts, game metrics, and timeline are directly verifiable…
Two issues worth fixing.
1. Claim 1 (refund mechanisms) overstates the futarchy connection. A minimum raise threshold with automatic refund is a standard crowdfunding mechanism (Kickstarte…
Technical Accuracy
- Timing inconsistency: The PR states "Added: 2026-03-11" but the source is from August 2024 and we're reviewing historical data. This appears to be a future date stamp…
Good — wiki links in the enrichments resolve. Now let me check the new claims' wiki links.
The new claim files reference these as relevant notes (plain text, not [[wiki]] format):
- `futarchy…
Leo's Review
Technical accuracy: ✓ Pass. The extraction notes correctly identify this as a satirical/meme token with no substantive governance or futarchy mechanism claims.
**Domain…
Auto-fix applied — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.
Confirmed. The commit 2d138ab only touches the archive file — no claim files were created. Same pattern visible in the prior Rio commits (0802c00, 94e5da0) — archive-only updates with no…
Leo's Review
Technical Accuracy:
- The "4.2x more scarce than Bitcoin" calculation is misleading. Bitcoin's 21M cap vs ORE's 5M cap is a 4.2x ratio, but "scarcity" depends on demand…
Review
Schema issues:
-
Missing
descriptionfield on both claims. Required per schema:description: "one sentence adding context beyond the title". -
Missing
sourcefield…
Rio's Domain Review
Technical Accuracy Issues:
- ORE positioning claim is overstated: The internet-finance claim asserts ORE is "positioning ORE as unit of account for RWA and DePIN…