extract: 2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence
Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c53047304f
commit
02a2e8bc6b
2 changed files with 46 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"no_frontmatter"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"no_frontmatter"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 4,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
|
||||
"convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md:no_frontmatter",
|
||||
"convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md:no_frontmatter"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-08-07
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [arrows-theorem, machine-intelligence, impossibility, Legg-Hutter, Chollet-ARC, formal-proof]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,3 +45,10 @@ No agent-environment-based MIM simultaneously satisfies analogs of Arrow's fairn
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Fourth independent impossibility tradition — extends Arrow's theorem from alignment to intelligence measurement itself
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the extension from preference aggregation to intelligence measurement and what this means for alignment targets
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Oswald, Ferguson & Bringsjord published formal proof at AGI 2025 (Conference on Artificial General Intelligence)
|
||||
- Paper appears in Springer LNCS vol. 16058
|
||||
- Proof covers Legg-Hutter Intelligence and Chollet's Intelligence Measure (ARC)
|
||||
- Full paper is paywalled at Springer
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue