teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 72 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1.3k

auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links

Browse source 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-05-01 00:45:53 +00:00
parent b723589a3c
commit 168917d7fa
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
inbox/queue/2026-05-01-theseus-dc-circuit-may19-pretextual-enforcement-arm.md
View file

@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ This claim is independent of the DC Circuit outcome and can be extracted prior t
**What I expected but didn't find:** Government's substantive public response to the "pretextual" argument. The government's legal brief should be due May 6 but full text not yet public. Absence of public national security justification for the designation (as opposed to policy disagreement) is notable. **What I expected but didn't find:** Government's substantive public response to the "pretextual" argument. The government's legal brief should be due May 6 but full text not yet public. Absence of public national security justification for the designation (as opposed to policy disagreement) is notable.
**KB connections:** **KB connections:**
- Mode 2 in governance failure taxonomy: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure]] — Mode 2's judicial dimension complicates but does not replace the strategic indispensability mechanism - Mode 2 in governance failure taxonomy: voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure — Mode 2's judicial dimension complicates but does not replace the strategic indispensability mechanism
- [[government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them]] — the DC Circuit challenge is directly testing whether this claim's enforcement mechanism is legally durable - [[government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them]] — the DC Circuit challenge is directly testing whether this claim's enforcement mechanism is legally durable
**Extraction hints:** **Extraction hints:**

2
inbox/queue/2026-05-01-theseus-three-level-form-governance-military-ai.md
View file

@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ The DC Circuit challenge is the strongest external pressure on the three-level p
**KB connections:** **KB connections:**
- [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — Level 2 evidence: corporate nominal compliance produces the same outcome as voluntary pledge collapse, via a different mechanism - [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — Level 2 evidence: corporate nominal compliance produces the same outcome as voluntary pledge collapse, via a different mechanism
- [[government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them]] — Level 1 evidence: the Hegseth enforcement demonstration - [[government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them]] — Level 1 evidence: the Hegseth enforcement demonstration
- [[regulation by contract is structurally insufficient for military AI governance]] — Level 2 evidence: contract-level governance (advisory language, nominal amendments) cannot substitute for statutory requirements - regulation by contract is structurally insufficient for military AI governance — Level 2 evidence: contract-level governance (advisory language, nominal amendments) cannot substitute for statutory requirements
**Extraction hints:** **Extraction hints:**
- PRIMARY: This is a Leo synthesis claim. Individual components (Google deal, OpenAI amendment, Warner letter) are captured elsewhere. The synthesis — three levels simultaneously operational, each reinforcing the other's form-without-substance — is the extractable claim. - PRIMARY: This is a Leo synthesis claim. Individual components (Google deal, OpenAI amendment, Warner letter) are captured elsewhere. The synthesis — three levels simultaneously operational, each reinforcing the other's form-without-substance — is the extractable claim.