extract: 2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>

inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.json

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 2,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 7,
+    "rejected": 2,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
+      "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
+      "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front",
+      "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:pre-deployment-AI-evaluations-do-not-predict-real-world-risk",
+      "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
+      "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
+      "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-20"
+}

inbox/queue/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md

@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2024-07-12
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: legislation
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 tags: [EU-AI-Act, GPAI, systemic-risk, Article-55, Article-92, conformity-assessment, independent-evaluation, AI-Office, enforcement, 10-25-FLOPs]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-20
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -59,3 +63,21 @@ Maximum fine: **3% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 15 million, whichever is
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — EU AI Act's mandatory structure counters this weakness, but flexible compliance pathways partially reintroduce it
 WHY ARCHIVED: First binding mandatory evaluation framework globally for frontier AI — essential for B1 disconfirmation assessment and the multi-session "governance gap" thesis
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the Article 92 compulsory evaluation / reactive vs proactive distinction — this is the key structural feature that makes EU AI Act stronger than voluntary-collaborative METR/AISI but weaker than FDA pre-market approval
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- EU AI Act became applicable August 2, 2025
+- GPAI systemic risk threshold: 10^25 floating-point operations (approximately GPT-4 training compute)
+- Maximum fine for GPAI violations: 3% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 15 million, whichever is higher
+- Final Code of Practice approved July 10, 2025
+- Codes of practice deadline was May 2025
+- Commission deadline to impose binding common rules if codes inadequate: August 2025
+- Article 51 defines GPAI systemic risk classification
+- Article 53 defines standard GPAI provider obligations
+- Article 55 defines systemic risk GPAI obligations
+- Article 56 defines codes of practice process
+- Article 88 grants Commission exclusive enforcement powers
+- Article 91 defines information and documentation request powers
+- Article 92 defines compulsory evaluation powers
+- Article 101 defines fines for GPAI providers
+- Open-source exception applies to standard GPAI obligations EXCEPT for models with systemic risk