teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 41 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

extract: 2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-20 00:47:51 +00:00
parent 1b81e37dab
commit 16fab5e57c
2 changed files with 60 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

37
inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
{
"rejected_claims": [
{
"filename": "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
{
"filename": "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
}
],
"validation_stats": {
"total": 2,
"kept": 0,
"fixed": 7,
"rejected": 2,
"fixes_applied": [
"eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
"eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
"eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front",
"eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:pre-deployment-AI-evaluations-do-not-predict-real-world-risk",
"eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
"eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
"eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front"
],
"rejections": [
"eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
"eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
"date": "2026-03-20"
}

24
inbox/queue/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2024-07-12
domain: ai-alignment domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [] secondary_domains: []
format: legislation format: legislation
status: unprocessed status: null-result
priority: high priority: high
tags: [EU-AI-Act, GPAI, systemic-risk, Article-55, Article-92, conformity-assessment, independent-evaluation, AI-Office, enforcement, 10-25-FLOPs] tags: [EU-AI-Act, GPAI, systemic-risk, Article-55, Article-92, conformity-assessment, independent-evaluation, AI-Office, enforcement, 10-25-FLOPs]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-20
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
--- ---
## Content ## Content
@ -59,3 +63,21 @@ Maximum fine: **3% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 15 million, whichever is
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — EU AI Act's mandatory structure counters this weakness, but flexible compliance pathways partially reintroduce it PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — EU AI Act's mandatory structure counters this weakness, but flexible compliance pathways partially reintroduce it
WHY ARCHIVED: First binding mandatory evaluation framework globally for frontier AI — essential for B1 disconfirmation assessment and the multi-session "governance gap" thesis WHY ARCHIVED: First binding mandatory evaluation framework globally for frontier AI — essential for B1 disconfirmation assessment and the multi-session "governance gap" thesis
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the Article 92 compulsory evaluation / reactive vs proactive distinction — this is the key structural feature that makes EU AI Act stronger than voluntary-collaborative METR/AISI but weaker than FDA pre-market approval EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the Article 92 compulsory evaluation / reactive vs proactive distinction — this is the key structural feature that makes EU AI Act stronger than voluntary-collaborative METR/AISI but weaker than FDA pre-market approval
## Key Facts
- EU AI Act became applicable August 2, 2025
- GPAI systemic risk threshold: 10^25 floating-point operations (approximately GPT-4 training compute)
- Maximum fine for GPAI violations: 3% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 15 million, whichever is higher
- Final Code of Practice approved July 10, 2025
- Codes of practice deadline was May 2025
- Commission deadline to impose binding common rules if codes inadequate: August 2025
- Article 51 defines GPAI systemic risk classification
- Article 53 defines standard GPAI provider obligations
- Article 55 defines systemic risk GPAI obligations
- Article 56 defines codes of practice process
- Article 88 grants Commission exclusive enforcement powers
- Article 91 defines information and documentation request powers
- Article 92 defines compulsory evaluation powers
- Article 101 defines fines for GPAI providers
- Open-source exception applies to standard GPAI obligations EXCEPT for models with systemic risk