rio: extract from 2024-02-05-futardio-proposal-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-02-05-futardio-proposal-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 2) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
ba4ac4a73e
commit
1f1b9ef9e2
6 changed files with 79 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "UuGEwN9aeh676ufphbavfssWVxH7BJCqacq1RYhco8e"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HyA2h16uPQBFjezKf77wThNGsEoesUjeQf9rFvfAy4tF"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2024-02-05
|
||||
resolution_date: 2024-02-10
|
||||
category: "treasury"
|
||||
summary: "Authorized 4,130 META transfer to 4/6 multisig to execute spot market creation via liquidity pool on Meteora"
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
meta_allocated: "4,130 META"
|
||||
participant_allocation: "3,100 META"
|
||||
liquidity_pool: "1,000 META + 35,000 USDC"
|
||||
initial_price: "35 USDC/META"
|
||||
multisig_compensation: "30 META (5 per member)"
|
||||
multisig_threshold: "4/6"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
Proposal 5 authorized the transfer of 4,130 META tokens to a 6-person multisig (4/6 threshold) to execute the creation of a spot market for META tokens. This followed the passage of Proposal 3, which gave the DAO authority to raise capital and create a liquidity pool. The execution involved: (1) distributing 3,100 META to sale participants who committed USDC, (2) pairing 1,000 META with 35,000 USDC to create a liquidity pool on Meteora at an initial price of 35 USDC/META, and (3) compensating multisig members with 5 META each.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** UuGEwN9aeh676ufphbavfssWVxH7BJCqacq1RYhco8e
|
||||
- **Proposal Number:** 5
|
||||
- **Completed:** 2024-02-10 (5 days after creation)
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Process
|
||||
The proposal detailed a multi-step execution timeline:
|
||||
1. Participants submitted demand via Google form
|
||||
2. Proph3t allocated amounts and notified participants (Feb 5)
|
||||
3. USDC transfer deadline (Feb 7)
|
||||
4. Backfill allocation for non-completing participants (Feb 8)
|
||||
5. META distribution, LP creation, and multisig disbandment (Feb 9)
|
||||
|
||||
Multisig members: Proph3t, Dean, Nallok, Durden, Rar3, BlockchainFixesThis
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This proposal demonstrates the operational gap between futarchy's market-based decision-making and execution. The proposal explicitly acknowledged "no algorithmic guarantee" of proper execution, relying instead on reputational stakes of multisig members. This reveals that even after conditional markets determine optimal decisions, MetaDAO requires traditional trust-minimized governance structures (multisig with reputational enforcement) for treasury operations involving real capital.
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal also shows MetaDAO's approach to liquidity bootstrapping: using futarchy to authorize capital deployment, then executing through a time-bound multisig that disbands after completion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - treasury management decision
|
||||
- [[meteora]] - liquidity pool platform
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance]] - confirms this pattern
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-02-05** — [[metadao-execute-creation-spot-market-meta]] passed: Authorized 4,130 META transfer to 4/6 multisig to create spot market via Meteora liquidity pool (1,000 META + 35,000 USDC at 35 USDC/META initial price)
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ Solana liquidity protocol offering Dynamic Liquidity Market Maker (DLMM) pools,
|
|||
- **2025-Q4** — Meteora LP generates $1.15M in fees for MetaDAO (Pine Analytics Q4 report)
|
||||
- **2025-10 to 2026-03** — Every Futardio launch allocates 900K tokens to Meteora pool as standard template
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-09** — MetaDAO created META/USDC liquidity pool on Meteora with 1,000 META + 35,000 USDC (35 USDC/META initial price) following futarchy-approved Proposal 5
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **Infrastructure role**: Not competing with MetaDAO — provides complementary liquidity infrastructure. Meteora is the LP venue; Futarchic AMM is the governance venue.
|
||||
- **vs Raydium**: Both are major Solana AMMs. Raydium offers CLMM (concentrated liquidity). Meteora differentiates with DLMM and dynamic bonding pools.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,3 +48,7 @@ Relevant Entities:
|
|||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-05** — Served as 4/6 multisig member for MetaDAO Proposal 5, helping execute 4,130 META treasury operation for spot market creation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -44,3 +44,7 @@ Relevant Entities:
|
|||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-05** — Served as allocation decision-maker and 4/6 multisig member for MetaDAO Proposal 5 (spot market creation), managing participant selection and USDC collection process
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,14 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HyA2h16uPQBFjezKf77wThNGsEoesUjeQf9rFvfAy4t
|
|||
date: 2024-02-05
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window.md", "futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This source is a governance proposal record, not a claim-generating document. Primary value is entity data (decision_market entity creation) and enrichment evidence for existing claims about futarchy execution gaps. The proposal explicitly acknowledges the trust assumption in multisig execution ('no algorithmic guarantee'), which confirms existing claims about governance scaffolding requirements. No novel claims extracted—the insights about execution trust and multisig reliance are already captured in existing KB claims."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -61,3 +66,11 @@ Obviously, there is no algorithmic guarantee that the multisig members will actu
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.1
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-02-10
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-02-10
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO Proposal 5 passed 2024-02-05, completed 2024-02-10
|
||||
- Proposal allocated 4,130 META: 3,100 to participants, 1,000 for LP, 30 for multisig compensation
|
||||
- Initial META spot price set at 35 USDC/META via 1,000 META + 35,000 USDC Meteora pool
|
||||
- Multisig: Proph3t, Dean, Nallok, Durden, Rar3, BlockchainFixesThis (4/6 threshold)
|
||||
- Proposal 5 executed the mandate from earlier Proposal 3 to raise capital and create liquidity
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue