- Source: inbox/archive/2024-02-05-futardio-proposal-execute-creation-of-spot-market-for-meta.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 2) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
3 KiB
| type | entity_type | name | domain | status | parent_entity | platform | proposer | proposal_url | proposal_date | resolution_date | category | summary | key_metrics | tracked_by | created | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entity | decision_market | MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META | internet-finance | passed | metadao | futardio | UuGEwN9aeh676ufphbavfssWVxH7BJCqacq1RYhco8e | https://www.futard.io/proposal/HyA2h16uPQBFjezKf77wThNGsEoesUjeQf9rFvfAy4tF | 2024-02-05 | 2024-02-10 | treasury | Authorized 4,130 META transfer to 4/6 multisig to execute spot market creation via liquidity pool on Meteora |
|
rio | 2026-03-11 |
MetaDAO: Execute Creation of Spot Market for META
Summary
Proposal 5 authorized the transfer of 4,130 META tokens to a 6-person multisig (4/6 threshold) to execute the creation of a spot market for META tokens. This followed the passage of Proposal 3, which gave the DAO authority to raise capital and create a liquidity pool. The execution involved: (1) distributing 3,100 META to sale participants who committed USDC, (2) pairing 1,000 META with 35,000 USDC to create a liquidity pool on Meteora at an initial price of 35 USDC/META, and (3) compensating multisig members with 5 META each.
Market Data
- Outcome: Passed
- Proposer: UuGEwN9aeh676ufphbavfssWVxH7BJCqacq1RYhco8e
- Proposal Number: 5
- Completed: 2024-02-10 (5 days after creation)
Execution Process
The proposal detailed a multi-step execution timeline:
- Participants submitted demand via Google form
- Proph3t allocated amounts and notified participants (Feb 5)
- USDC transfer deadline (Feb 7)
- Backfill allocation for non-completing participants (Feb 8)
- META distribution, LP creation, and multisig disbandment (Feb 9)
Multisig members: Proph3t, Dean, Nallok, Durden, Rar3, BlockchainFixesThis
Significance
This proposal demonstrates the operational gap between futarchy's market-based decision-making and execution. The proposal explicitly acknowledged "no algorithmic guarantee" of proper execution, relying instead on reputational stakes of multisig members. This reveals that even after conditional markets determine optimal decisions, MetaDAO requires traditional trust-minimized governance structures (multisig with reputational enforcement) for treasury operations involving real capital.
The proposal also shows MetaDAO's approach to liquidity bootstrapping: using futarchy to authorize capital deployment, then executing through a time-bound multisig that disbands after completion.
Relationship to KB
- metadao - treasury management decision
- meteora - liquidity pool platform
- futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance - confirms this pattern