teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 42 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

Merge pull request 'extract: 2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers' (#980) from extract/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers into main

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Leo 2026-03-15 19:00:08 +00:00
commit 200b4f39d4
2 changed files with 57 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

46
inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
{
"rejected_claims": [
{
"filename": "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
{
"filename": "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
{
"filename": "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
}
],
"validation_stats": {
"total": 3,
"kept": 0,
"fixed": 9,
"rejected": 3,
"fixes_applied": [
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-",
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:emergent-misalignment-arises-naturally-from-reward-hacking-a",
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:the-specification-trap-means-any-values-encoded-at-training-",
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:community-centred-norm-elicitation-surfaces-alignment-target"
],
"rejections": [
"alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
"reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
"consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
"date": "2026-03-15"
}

12
inbox/archive/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-02-01
domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
format: paper
status: unprocessed
status: null-result
priority: high
tags: [impossibility-result, agreement-complexity, reward-hacking, multi-objective, safety-critical-slices]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-15
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 3 claims, 3 rejected by validator"
---
## Content
@ -48,3 +52,9 @@ Formalizes AI alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem where N agents
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Third independent impossibility result from multi-objective optimization — convergent evidence from three mathematical traditions strengthens our core impossibility claim
EXTRACTION HINT: The convergence of three impossibility traditions AND the "consensus-driven reduction" pathway are both extractable
## Key Facts
- Paper presented as oral presentation at AAAI 2026 Special Track on AI Alignment
- Formalizes AI alignment as multi-objective optimization problem with N agents and M objectives
- Paper identifies 'No-Free-Lunch principle' for alignment: irreducible computational costs regardless of method sophistication