teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 19 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

leo: consolidate enrichments from PRs 971,979,1004,1007

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-16 11:01:01 +00:00
parent fbfccc6773
commit 2f2120936d
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
domains/internet-finance/futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md
View file

@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ The risk is that cultural proposals introduce systematic bias: participants who
The single data point is limited. One passed proposal doesn't establish a reliable pattern. Cultural proposals that fail futarchy governance (and thus go unobserved in public records) would provide the necessary counter-evidence to calibrate how often futarchy actually validates cultural versus financial spending. The single data point is limited. One passed proposal doesn't establish a reliable pattern. Cultural proposals that fail futarchy governance (and thus go unobserved in public records) would provide the necessary counter-evidence to calibrate how often futarchy actually validates cultural versus financial spending.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2025-01-14-futardio-proposal-should-deans-list-dao-update-the-liquidity-fee-structure]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
Dean's List DAO's fee increase proposal included switching quote token from mSOL back to SOL, a decision with no direct revenue impact but potential effects on user experience and composability. The futarchy market approved this alongside the fee changes, suggesting it priced the operational simplification and ecosystem alignment as net positive for token value despite being a 'cultural' rather than purely financial decision.
--- ---
Relevant Notes: Relevant Notes: