auto-fix: strip 5 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
657a69ed5f
commit
41afaf2bb1
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ created: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[related-claim]] — how it relates
|
||||
- related-claim — how it relates
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domain-map]]
|
||||
- domain-map
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Propose Claims (Proposer Workflow)
|
||||
|
|
@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ For each proposed claim, check:
|
|||
5. **Duplicate check** — Does this already exist in the knowledge base? (semantic, not just title match)
|
||||
6. **Contradiction check** — Does this contradict an existing claim? If so, is the contradiction explicit and argued?
|
||||
7. **Value add** — Does this genuinely expand what the knowledge base knows?
|
||||
8. **Wiki links** — Do all `[[links]]` point to real files?
|
||||
8. **Wiki links** — Do all `links` point to real files?
|
||||
|
||||
### Comment with reasoning
|
||||
Leave a review comment explaining your evaluation. Be specific:
|
||||
|
|
@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ When your session begins:
|
|||
## Design Principles (from Ars Contexta)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Prose-as-title:** Every note is a proposition, not a filing label
|
||||
- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `[[links]]` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
|
||||
- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `links` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
|
||||
- **Discovery-first:** Every note must be findable by a future agent who doesn't know it exists
|
||||
- **Atomic notes:** One insight per file
|
||||
- **Cross-domain connections:** The most valuable connections span domains
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ tags: [cross-domain, architecture, case-study, pattern, ...]
|
|||
Freeform. No quality gates. The point is to think, not to publish. However:
|
||||
|
||||
- Date your additions so the evolution of thinking is visible
|
||||
- Link to relevant claims with `[[wiki links]]` where connections exist
|
||||
- Link to relevant claims with `wiki links` where connections exist
|
||||
- **One-way linking only:** musings may link to claims, but claims must NEVER link back to musings. Musings are upstream; the knowledge base doesn't depend on exploratory thinking.
|
||||
|
||||
### Conventions (use these inline markers)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue