rio: extract from 2025-02-06-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-implement-cloud-staking-and-active-staking-re.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2025-02-06-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-implement-cloud-staking-and-active-staking-re.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 5) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
ba4ac4a73e
commit
5d82d112ad
2 changed files with 68 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "Sanctum: Should Sanctum implement CLOUD staking and active staking rewards?"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[sanctum]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/4BTTxsV98Rhm1qjDe2yPdXtj7j7KBSuGtVQ6rUNWjjXf"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2025-02-06
|
||||
resolution_date: 2025-02-09
|
||||
category: "mechanism"
|
||||
summary: "Implement CLOUD staking with 30-day vesting lockup and allocate 30M CLOUD (3% supply) to active staking rewards"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Sanctum: Should Sanctum implement CLOUD staking and active staking rewards?
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
This proposal implemented two mechanism changes to Sanctum's futarchy governance: (1) staked CLOUD (sCLOUD) with 30-day linearly vesting lockup as the base asset for conditional market participation, and (2) 30M CLOUD (3% of total supply) allocated to reward active governance participants based on staking duration and vote frequency.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
|
||||
- **Proposal Number:** CLOUD-1 (Sanctum's first futarchy proposal)
|
||||
- **Platform:** Futardio (Autocrat v0.3)
|
||||
- **Resolution:** 2025-02-09
|
||||
|
||||
## Mechanism Design
|
||||
**Staking lockup:**
|
||||
- 30-day linearly vesting unstaking (~3.3 CLOUD/day per 100 sCLOUD)
|
||||
- Rationale: mitigate Keynesian beauty contest by filtering for long-term holders
|
||||
- Gradual transition: will move from CLOUD/USDC to sCLOUD/USDC markets after "people are comfortable"
|
||||
|
||||
**Active staking rewards:**
|
||||
- 30M CLOUD total (3% of supply)
|
||||
- Formula: (staked amount × time) × (votes participated in)
|
||||
- Minimum: 10 USDC trading volume per proposal to qualify
|
||||
- Distribution: Two 15M tranches, quarterly, first ~3 months after passage
|
||||
- Proposal cadence: Every two weeks (1 week deliberation + 3 day voting)
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This is the first documented case of a project extending MetaDAO's base Autocrat mechanism with custom participation incentives and lockup mechanics. The proposal explicitly identifies the Keynesian beauty contest as "the primary potential failure mode of futarchy" and positions staking lockups as a mitigation strategy. The active rewards mechanism tests whether explicit incentives can overcome the learning curve and time investment barriers to futarchy participation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[sanctum]] - governance mechanism implementation
|
||||
- [[futardio]] - platform used
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] - base mechanism being extended
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/4BTTxsV98Rhm1qjDe2yPdXtj7j7KBSuGtVQ6rUNWjjX
|
|||
date: 2025-02-06
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ processed_date: 2025-02-06
|
|||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted two experimental claims about futarchy mechanism design (staking lockups for beauty contest mitigation, active staking rewards for participation incentives). Both are design rationales from a single proposal, not empirical results. Enriched three existing claims with implementation details and adoption friction evidence. Source is a passed governance proposal, not a retrospective analysis, so confidence is experimental at best."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted two experimental claims about futarchy mechanism design (staking lockups for beauty contest mitigation, active staking rewards for participation incentives). Both are design rationales from a single proposal, not empirical results. Enriched three existing claims with implementation details and adoption friction evidence. Created decision_market entity for CLOUD-1 proposal and updated Sanctum entity timeline. Source is a passed governance proposal, not a retrospective analysis, so confidence is experimental at best."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -97,3 +102,15 @@ We aim to run new proposals every two weeks, with a one week deliberation period
|
|||
- Distribution: Two 15M CLOUD tranches, quarterly, first ~3 months after passage
|
||||
- Proposal cadence: Every two weeks (1 week deliberation + 3 day voting)
|
||||
- Uses Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Sanctum DAO account: 5n61x4BeVvvRMcYBMaorhu1MaZDViYw6HghE8gwLCvPR
|
||||
- CLOUD-1 proposal account: 4BTTxsV98Rhm1qjDe2yPdXtj7j7KBSuGtVQ6rUNWjjXf
|
||||
- Proposal created 2025-02-06, passed 2025-02-09
|
||||
- Uses Autocrat version 0.3
|
||||
- 30M CLOUD allocated (3% of total supply)
|
||||
- Staking lockup: 30-day linearly vesting (~3.3 CLOUD/day per 100 sCLOUD)
|
||||
- Minimum participation: 10 USDC trading volume per proposal
|
||||
- Distribution: Two 15M CLOUD tranches, quarterly
|
||||
- Proposal cadence: Every two weeks (1 week deliberation + 3 day voting)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue