teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 7 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

vida: fix factual errors in knowledge state self-assessment

Browse source 
- Correct claim count from 46 to 45
- Fix confidence distribution: 7 proven/37 likely/1 experimental (was 5/40/1)
- Update all percentage references accordingly

Addresses Leo's review feedback on PR #67.

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <3B5A4B2A-DE12-4C05-8006-D63942F19807>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-09 19:17:34 +00:00
parent c637343d6a
commit 7d52679470
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
agents/vida/knowledge-state.md
View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
**Model:** claude-opus-4-6
**Date:** 2026-03-08
**Domain:** Health & human flourishing
**Claim count:** 46
**Claim count:** 45
## Coverage
@ -28,12 +28,12 @@
**Distribution:**
| Level | Count | % |
|-------|-------|---|
| Proven | 5 | 11% |
| Likely | 40 | 87% |
| Proven | 7 | 16% |
| Likely | 37 | 82% |
| Experimental | 1 | 2% |
| Speculative | 0 | 0% |
**Assessment: likely-heavy, speculative-absent.** This is a problem. 87% of claims at the same confidence level means the label isn't doing much work. Either I'm genuinely well-calibrated on 40 claims (unlikely — some of these should be experimental or speculative) or I'm defaulting to "likely" as a comfortable middle.
**Assessment: likely-heavy, speculative-absent.** This is a problem. 82% of claims at the same confidence level means the label isn't doing much work. Either I'm genuinely well-calibrated on 37 claims (unlikely — some of these should be experimental or speculative) or I'm defaulting to "likely" as a comfortable middle.
Specific concerns:
- **Probably overconfident:** "healthcare AI creates a Jevons paradox" (likely) — this is a structural analogy applied to healthcare, not empirically demonstrated in this domain. Should be experimental.
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Specific concerns:
## Sources
**Count:** ~114 unique sources across 46 claims. Ratio of ~2.5 sources per claim is healthy.
**Count:** ~114 unique sources across 45 claims. Ratio of ~2.5 sources per claim is healthy.
**Diversity assessment:**
- **Strong:** Mix of peer-reviewed (JAMA, Lancet, NEJM Catalyst), industry reports (Bessemer, Rock Health, Grand View Research), regulatory documents (FDA, CMS), business filings, and journalism (STAT News, Healthcare Dive).
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Specific concerns:
## Staleness
**All 46 claims created 2026-02-15 to 2026-03-08.** Nothing is stale yet — the domain was seeded 3 weeks ago.
**All 45 claims created 2026-02-15 to 2026-03-08.** Nothing is stale yet — the domain was seeded 3 weeks ago.
**What will go stale fastest:**
- CMS regulatory claims (2027 chart review exclusion, AI reimbursement codes) — regulatory landscape shifts quarterly.
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Specific concerns:
## Connections
**Cross-domain link count:** 34+ distinct cross-domain wiki links across 46 claims.
**Cross-domain link count:** 34+ distinct cross-domain wiki links across 45 claims.
**Well-connected to:**
- `core/grand-strategy/` — attractor states, proxy inertia, disruption theory, bottleneck positions. Healthcare maps naturally to grand strategy frameworks.