rio: extract from 2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba4ac4a73e
commit
935832dae4
4 changed files with 75 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless
|
|||
|
||||
- **2026-03-07** — Areal DAO launch: $50K target, raised $11,654 (23.3%), REFUNDING status by 2026-03-08 — first documented failed futarchy-governed fundraise on platform
|
||||
- **2026-03-04** — [[seekervault]] fundraise launched targeting $75,000, closed next day with only $1,186 (1.6% of target) in refunding status
|
||||
- **2024-01-24** — MetaDAO proposal to develop AMM program for futarchy markets to replace CLOBs, addressing liquidity and state rent costs
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
|
||||
- **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy?"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "joebuild"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/CF9QUBS251FnNGZHLJ4WbB2CVRi5BtqJbCqMi47NX1PG"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2024-01-24
|
||||
resolution_date: 2024-01-29
|
||||
category: "mechanism"
|
||||
summary: "Proposal to migrate MetaDAO's futarchy implementation from CLOBs to AMMs to solve liquidity, manipulation, and state rent problems"
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
budget: "400 META on passing, 800 META on completion"
|
||||
timeline: "3 weeks development + 1 week review"
|
||||
state_rent_savings: "135-225 SOL annually"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy?
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
Proposal to replace MetaDAO's CLOB-based futarchy markets with AMMs using liquidity-weighted time-average pricing and 3-5% fees. The migration addresses three problems with the existing Autocrat v0.1 implementation: lack of liquidity from wide bid-ask spreads, manipulation vulnerability through selective cranking and wash trading, and high state rent costs of 3.75 SOL per market pair.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** joebuild
|
||||
- **Created:** 2024-01-24
|
||||
- **Completed:** 2024-01-29
|
||||
- **Budget:** 400 META on passing proposal, 800 META on completed migration
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This represents MetaDAO's first major mechanism upgrade after initial launch, addressing operational friction that limited trading volume and created manipulation vulnerabilities. The migration from CLOBs to AMMs is a simplification move that trades off some flexibility (one-sided liquidity provision) for better liquidity bootstrapping and manipulation resistance through high fees. The proposal demonstrates how production futarchy systems must iterate on theoretical designs to handle real-world constraints around liquidity, state rent, and attack vectors.
|
||||
|
||||
The implementation includes quality-of-life improvements like loosening time restrictions on proposal creation (currently 50 slots) and automatic reversion to fail status if proposal instructions don't execute, showing how operational experience reveals friction points in governance mechanisms.
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Details
|
||||
- AMM tracks liquidity-weighted average price over proposal lifetime
|
||||
- 3-5% fees discourage manipulation while incentivizing LPs
|
||||
- Proposers must lock initial liquidity and set starting prices
|
||||
- State rent drops from 3.75 SOL per market to near-zero
|
||||
- Removes 1 META minimum order size requirement
|
||||
- Includes feature to permissionlessly pause swaps and return positions after verdict
|
||||
- Includes feature to permissionlessly close AMMs and return state rent SOL when no positions remain
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Team
|
||||
- **Program changes:** joebuild
|
||||
- **Program review:** TBD expert in MetaDAO
|
||||
- **Frontend integration:** 0xNalloK
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[metadao]] - mechanism upgrade
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] - extends with AMM implementation details
|
||||
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] - confirms liquidity as primary friction
|
||||
- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] - challenges with real manipulation vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-01-24** — [[metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy]] proposed: migrate from CLOBs to AMMs to solve liquidity and manipulation problems
|
||||
- **2024-01-29** — [[metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy]] passed: approved 400 META for development, 800 META on completion of AMM migration
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,14 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/CF9QUBS251FnNGZHLJ4WbB2CVRi5BtqJbCqMi47NX1P
|
|||
date: 2024-01-24
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Primary extraction: decision_market entity for the AMM migration proposal. One new claim on AMM mechanism design for futarchy. Three enrichments: extends Autocrat implementation details, confirms liquidity friction, challenges manipulation resistance with real vulnerabilities. The proposal provides concrete operational data on MetaDAO's CLOB problems (state rent costs, manipulation vectors, liquidity issues) that both confirms existing claims about futarchy adoption friction and challenges claims about manipulation resistance. The AMM design (liquidity-weighted TWAP with high fees) is a novel mechanism variant worth capturing as a claim."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -128,3 +133,11 @@ Any important changes or feedback brought up during the proposal vote will be re
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.1
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-01-29
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-01-29
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO CLOB markets cost 3.75 SOL in state rent per pass/fail pair (2024-01-24)
|
||||
- MetaDAO averages 3-5 proposals per month, totaling 135-225 SOL annual state rent costs (2024-01-24)
|
||||
- Proposed AMM implementation timeline: 3 weeks development + 1 week review (2024-01-24)
|
||||
- Budget: 400 META on passing, 800 META on completion (2024-01-24)
|
||||
- Proposal passed 2024-01-29, 5 days after creation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue