auto-fix: strip 24 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
da1c68702a
commit
9f60fc3dfd
3 changed files with 23 additions and 23 deletions
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ status: active
|
|||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
||||
parent: "[[futardio]]"
|
||||
parent: "futardio"
|
||||
category: "Distributed internet banking infrastructure (Solana)"
|
||||
stage: growth
|
||||
funding: "$3.5M raised via Futardio ICO"
|
||||
|
|
@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ Distributed internet banking infrastructure — onchain credit scoring, spend ca
|
|||
|
||||
- **2026-00-00** — Demonstrated 4.7% holder churn during 65% drawdown (lost only 600 of 12,752 holders), cited as evidence of genuine community ownership versus speculative holding in 2026 crypto trends analysis
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launched on Futardio platform
|
||||
- futardio — launched on Futardio platform
|
||||
- [[cryptos primary use case is capital formation not payments or store of value because permissionless token issuance solves the fundraising bottleneck that solo founders and small teams face]] — test case for banking-focused crypto raising via permissionless ICO
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- futardio — launch platform
|
||||
- [[metadao]] — parent ecosystem
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ tracked_by: rio
|
|||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
||||
founded: 2023-01-01
|
||||
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
|
||||
founders: ["proph3t"]
|
||||
category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)"
|
||||
stage: growth
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)"
|
||||
futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
|
||||
proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
|
||||
competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"]
|
||||
competitors: ["snapshot", "tally"]
|
||||
built_on: ["Solana"]
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,21 +53,21 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation
|
||||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2026-00-00** — Multiple crypto research outlets (KuCoin, TechFlow, Bitget, Followin) identified MetaDAO as quality differentiator in 2026 trends analysis, citing 100% above-ICO survival rate versus Pump.fun's <0.5% as evidence of futarchy curation effectiveness
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | metadao-burn-993-percent-meta | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | metadao-develop-faas | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02 | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | metadao-fundraise-2 | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | metadao-create-futardio | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | metadao-token-split-elastic-supply | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | metadao-hire-robin-hanson | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | metadao-release-launchpad | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | metadao-migrate-meta-token | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale
|
||||
|
|
@ -93,15 +93,15 @@ MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision m
|
|||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
|
||||
- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
- DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- [[proph3t]] — founder
|
||||
- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- omnipair — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- proph3t — founder
|
||||
- solomon — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- futardio — launch platform
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ Multiple crypto research outlets identified ownership coins as a major investmen
|
|||
**Why this matters:** Ownership coins entering the mainstream crypto narrative is a validation signal. When research outlets and institutional players (Galaxy Digital) frame ownership coins as a distinct category, it accelerates adoption and capital flow.
|
||||
**What surprised me:** The Pump.fun comparison is stark — <0.5% survival rate vs 100% above-ICO for MetaDAO. This is the strongest comparative evidence for futarchy curation.
|
||||
**What I expected but didn't find:** Detailed institutional analysis of ownership coin legal frameworks. The narrative is primarily investment thesis, not regulatory analysis.
|
||||
**KB connections:** [[Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] — narrative adoption is itself a form of community ownership acceleration.
|
||||
**KB connections:** Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding — narrative adoption is itself a form of community ownership acceleration.
|
||||
**Extraction hints:** Pump.fun vs MetaDAO survival rate comparison. Ownership coin narrative adoption as signal.
|
||||
**Context:** Multiple outlets published similar "2026 trends" pieces citing MetaDAO. Galaxy Digital's framing carries institutional weight.
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]]
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Ownership coin narrative going mainstream is a meaningful signal. Pump.fun comparison (<0.5% vs 100% survival) is the strongest comparative data for futarchy curation quality.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) Pump.fun vs MetaDAO survival rates as futarchy curation evidence, (2) institutional narrative adoption (Galaxy Digital) as validation signal.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue