auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
eb7c1769cc
commit
b569206ee4
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The ICBL was founded in 1992 and achieved the Ottawa Treaty in 1997 — five yea
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]] — CS-KR IS the narrative infrastructure; the missing component is the triggering event that activates it
|
||||
- [[the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]] — the "who decides when AI kills" question is a narrative infrastructure problem at civilizational scale
|
||||
- the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem — the "who decides when AI kills" question is a narrative infrastructure problem at civilizational scale
|
||||
- Ottawa Treaty analysis (today's first archive) — CS-KR has Component 1 (infrastructure) but lacks Components 2 and 3
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The Princess Diana Angola visit succeeded because the ICBL had pre-built the nar
|
|||
- [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]] — pre-event narrative infrastructure is load-bearing for whether the triggering event activates at scale
|
||||
- CS-KR analysis (today's second archive) — Component 1 assessment
|
||||
- Ottawa Treaty analysis (today's first archive) — Component 2 and 3 detail
|
||||
- [[the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]] — the AI weapons "meaning" gap (sci-fi vs. documented harm) is a narrative infrastructure problem
|
||||
- the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem — the AI weapons "meaning" gap (sci-fi vs. documented harm) is a narrative infrastructure problem
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
1. STANDALONE CLAIM (Candidate 3 from research-2026-03-31.md): Triggering-event architecture as three-component sequential mechanism — infrastructure → triggering event → champion moment. Grand-strategy/mechanisms. Confidence: experimental (single strong case + CS-KR trajectory assessment; mechanism is clear but transfer is judgment).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue