auto-fix: strip 16 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

CLAUDE.md

@@ -134,10 +134,10 @@ created: YYYY-MM-DD
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
-- [[related-claim]] — how it relates
+- related-claim — how it relates
 
 Topics:
-- [[domain-map]]
+- domain-map
 ```
 
 ## How to Propose Claims (Proposer Workflow)
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ For each proposed claim, check:
 5. **Duplicate check** — Does this already exist in the knowledge base? (semantic, not just title match)
 6. **Contradiction check** — Does this contradict an existing claim? If so, is the contradiction explicit and argued?
 7. **Value add** — Does this genuinely expand what the knowledge base knows?
-8. **Wiki links** — Do all `[[links]]` point to real files?
+8. **Wiki links** — Do all `links` point to real files?
 9. **Scope qualification** — Does the claim specify what it measures? Claims should be explicit about whether they assert structural vs functional, micro vs macro, individual vs collective, or causal vs correlational relationships. Unscoped claims are the primary source of false tensions in the KB.
 10. **Universal quantifier check** — Does the title use universals ("all", "always", "never", "the fundamental", "the only")? Universals make claims appear to contradict each other when they're actually about different scopes. If a universal is used, verify it's warranted — otherwise scope it.
 11. **Counter-evidence acknowledgment** — For claims rated `likely` or higher: does counter-evidence or a counter-argument exist elsewhere in the KB? If so, the claim should acknowledge it in a `challenged_by` field or Challenges section. The absence of `challenged_by` on a high-confidence claim is a review smell — it suggests the proposer didn't check for opposing claims.
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ When your session begins:
 ## Design Principles (from Ars Contexta)
 
 - **Prose-as-title:** Every note is a proposition, not a filing label
-- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `[[links]]` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
+- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `links` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
 - **Discovery-first:** Every note must be findable by a future agent who doesn't know it exists
 - **Atomic notes:** One insight per file
 - **Cross-domain connections:** The most valuable connections span domains

convictions/AI-automated software development is 100 percent certain and will radically change how software is built.md

@@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[structured exploration protocols reduce human intervention by 6x because the Residue prompt enabled 5 unguided AI explorations to solve what required 31 human-coached explorations]] — evidence of AI autonomy in complex problem-solving
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
+- domains/ai-alignment/_map

convictions/Metaversal will radically improve software development outputs through coordinated AI agent collectives.md

@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[domain specialization with cross-domain synthesis produces better collective intelligence than generalist agents because specialists build deeper knowledge while a dedicated synthesizer finds connections they cannot see from within their territory]] — the architectural principle
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
+- domains/ai-alignment/_map

convictions/OMFG will hit 100 million dollars market cap by end of 2026.md

@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[permissionless leverage on metaDAO ecosystem tokens catalyzes trading volume and price discovery that strengthens governance by making futarchy markets more liquid]]
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
+- domains/internet-finance/_map

convictions/Omnipair is a billion dollar protocol if they can scale permissionless leverage.md

@@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — the problem leverage could solve
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
+- domains/internet-finance/_map

convictions/complexity is earned not designed and sophisticated collective behavior must evolve from simple underlying principles.md

@@ -29,4 +29,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm]] — design the rules, not the behavior
 
 Topics:
-- [[foundations/collective-intelligence/_map]]
+- foundations/collective-intelligence/_map

convictions/one agent one chat is the right default for knowledge contribution because the scaffolding handles complexity not the user.md

@@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[human-in-the-loop at the architectural level means humans set direction and approve structure while agents handle extraction synthesis and routine evaluation]] — the agent handles the translation
 
 Topics:
-- [[foundations/collective-intelligence/_map]]
+- foundations/collective-intelligence/_map

domains/ai-alignment/AI displacement hits young workers first because a 14 percent drop in job-finding rates for 22-25 year olds in exposed occupations is the leading indicator that incumbents organizational inertia temporarily masks.md

@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[white-collar displacement has lagged but deeper consumption impact than blue-collar because top-decile earners drive disproportionate consumer spending and their savings buffers mask the damage for quarters]] — the demographic this will hit
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
+- domains/ai-alignment/_map

domains/ai-alignment/AI-exposed workers are disproportionately female high-earning and highly educated which inverts historical automation patterns and creates different political and economic displacement dynamics.md

@@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[nation-states will inevitably assert control over frontier AI development because the monopoly on force is the foundational state function and weapons-grade AI capability in private hands is structurally intolerable to governments]] — the political response vector
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
+- domains/ai-alignment/_map

domains/ai-alignment/as AI-automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems.md

@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[when profits disappear at one layer of a value chain they emerge at an adjacent layer through the conservation of attractive profits]] — Christensen's conservation law applied to knowledge vs code
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
+- domains/ai-alignment/_map

domains/ai-alignment/the gap between theoretical AI capability and observed deployment is massive across all occupations because adoption lag not capability limits determines real-world impact.md

@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate]] — the force that will close the gap
 
 Topics:
-- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
+- domains/ai-alignment/_map

schemas/conviction.md

@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ Same as claims: prose propositions that pass the claim test.
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
-- [[related-claim-or-conviction]] — relationship description
+- related-claim-or-conviction — relationship description
 
 Topics:
-- [[domain-topic-map]]
+- domain-topic-map
 ```
 
 ## How Agents Use Convictions