entity-batch: update 3 entities
- Applied 4 entity operations from queue - Files: entities/internet-finance/futardio.md, entities/internet-finance/mycorealms.md, entities/internet-finance/omnipair.md Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>
This commit is contained in:
parent
85b2bc182a
commit
bb6ca0cb63
3 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless
|
|||
- **2024-08-28** — MetaDAO proposal to develop futardio as memecoin launchpad with futarchy governance failed. Proposal would have allocated $100k grant over 6 months to development team. Key features: percentage of each new token supply allocated to futarchy DAO, points-to-token conversion within 180 days, revenue distribution to $FUTA holders, immutable deployment on IPFS/Arweave. Proposal rejected by market, suggesting reputational risks outweighed adoption benefits.
|
||||
- **2025-11-14** — Solomon launch: $8M raised (12.9x oversubscribed, $102.9M committed) for composable yield-bearing stablecoin
|
||||
- **2026-02-03** — Hurupay fundraise launched targeting $3M, closed Feb 7 at $2M (67% of target) in refunding status
|
||||
- **2026-03-05** — Seyf AI-native wallet launch: raised $200 against $300,000 target, refunded (99.93% shortfall)
|
||||
- **2026-03-06** — LobsterFutarchy launch raised $1,183 against $500,000 target, closed in refunding status after one day
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
|
||||
- **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ The team includes crypticmeta (Solana/Bitcoin developer, previously built Ordina
|
|||
- **2026-03-04** — Fundraise closed in refunding status (did not reach $200K minimum)
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-01-01** — Launched $125,000 USDC raise on Futardio with 72-hour window. Token supply: 15.9M max (10M ICO, 2.9M liquidity, 3M team). Monthly allowance: $10,000. First CAPEX proposal: $50K for 3 growing rooms, accommodation, DG set. Team: crypticmeta (Solana/Bitcoin dev, OrdinalNovus $30M volume) + Ram (5+ years mushroom production). Performance-based team vesting: 5 tranches at 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x ICO price via 3-month TWAP, 18-month minimum cliff. All operations published to Arweave for transparency.
|
||||
- **2026-03-11** — Launched $125K futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio for mushroom farm infrastructure. Token supply: 15.9M max (12.9M circulating), with 10M ICO tokens (62.9%), 2.9M liquidity (18.2%), 3M team performance package (18.9%). Team tokens locked with 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x price triggers, 18-month cliff, 3-month TWAP evaluation. Monthly treasury allowance: $10K. First proposal post-raise: $50K CAPEX for 3 growing rooms, accommodation, DG set. 72-hour raise window with full refunds if target not met.
|
||||
## Governance Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Treasury control enforced through:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ Combined AMM + lending protocol on Solana — swapping and borrowing in the same
|
|||
- **Pending** — LP experience improvements, combined APY display (swap + interest), off-chain watchers for bad debt monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-01-00** — Performance update: reached 16x peak return, currently trading at ~5x from ICO price
|
||||
- **2026-03-09** — Jupiter SDK integration ready and imminent; identified as highest-impact near-term catalyst. Team of 6, $2-3M market cap, $250-300K TVL. Core challenge: chicken-and-egg liquidity bootstrapping between LPs (need borrow demand) and borrowers (need LP depth). Rate controller mechanism adjusts borrow costs dynamically based on utilization. 1% withdrawal fee implemented for security. Positioned as 'only game in town' for metaDAO ecosystem leverage until Drift enters (if META hits $1B).
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **"Only game in town"** for leverage on MetaDAO ecosystem tokens currently
|
||||
- Rakka argues mathematically: same AMM + aggregator integration + borrow rate surplus = must yield more than Raydium for equivalent pools
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue