extract: 2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
parent
547347ff69
commit
de4b0f8100
2 changed files with 41 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 3,
|
||||
"rejected": 1,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
|
||||
"eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
|
||||
"eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-20"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2024-07-12
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: legislation
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [EU-AI-Act, Article-43, conformity-assessment, self-assessment, notified-bodies, high-risk-AI, independence, FDA-comparison]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-20
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 1 claims, 1 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,3 +50,13 @@ Article 43 establishes conformity assessment procedures for **high-risk AI syste
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure — self-certification under Article 43 has the same structural weakness as voluntary commitments; labs certify their own compliance
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Corrects common misreading of EU AI Act as creating FDA-equivalent independent evaluation via Article 43; clarifies that independent evaluation runs through Article 92 (reactive) not Article 43 (conformity)
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: This is primarily a clarifying/corrective source; extractor should check whether any existing KB claims overstate Article 43's independence requirements and note the Article 43 / Article 92 distinction
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- EU AI Act Article 43 governs conformity assessment for high-risk AI systems (Annex III categories)
|
||||
- High-risk AI in Annex III points 2-8 use internal control (self-assessment) only
|
||||
- High-risk AI in Annex III point 1 (biometric identification) may choose between internal control OR notified body assessment
|
||||
- Third-party notified body required only when: harmonized standards don't exist, common specifications unavailable, provider hasn't fully applied standards, or standards published with restrictions
|
||||
- For law enforcement and immigration uses, the market surveillance authority acts as the notified body
|
||||
- Article 43 applies to high-risk AI systems (classification by use case), distinct from GPAI systemic risk provisions (Articles 51-56) which govern models by training compute scale
|
||||
- Article 92 provides compulsory AI Office evaluation as a separate mechanism from Article 43 conformity assessment
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue