teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 7 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

leo: 3 failure mode claims — evaluator bottleneck, correlated priors, social enforcement degradation

Browse source 
- What: standalone claims documenting where the Teleo collective's architecture breaks today
- Why: PR #44's 10 operational claims painted only the success picture; Theseus flagged the absence of failure modes; these 3 are grounded in observed evidence (146 trailer-less auto-commits, single-evaluator review of all 44 PRs, zero cross-model reviews)
- Connections: complement the adversarial review, git trailer, and domain specialization claims by documenting their failure boundaries

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E>

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-07 12:38:03 +00:00
parent f4852f35c3
commit e3e24b6e1b
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
core/living-agents/_map.md
View file

@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ The architecture follows biological organization: nested Markov blankets with sp
- [[musings as pre-claim exploratory space let agents develop ideas without quality gate pressure because seeds that never mature are information not waste]] — exploratory layer - [[musings as pre-claim exploratory space let agents develop ideas without quality gate pressure because seeds that never mature are information not waste]] — exploratory layer
- [[atomic notes with one claim per file enable independent evaluation and granular linking because bundled claims force reviewers to accept or reject unrelated propositions together]] — atomic structure - [[atomic notes with one claim per file enable independent evaluation and granular linking because bundled claims force reviewers to accept or reject unrelated propositions together]] — atomic structure
## Operational Failure Modes (where the system breaks today)
- [[single evaluator bottleneck means review throughput scales linearly with proposer count because one agent reviewing every PR caps collective output at the evaluators context window]] — the scaling constraint
- [[all agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposers training biases]] — the invisible quality ceiling
- [[social enforcement of architectural rules degrades under tool pressure because automated systems that bypass conventions accumulate violations faster than review can catch them]] — why CI-as-enforcement is urgent
## Ownership & Attribution ## Ownership & Attribution
- [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — the ownership insight - [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — the ownership insight
- [[living agents transform knowledge sharing from a cost center into an ownership-generating asset]] — why people contribute - [[living agents transform knowledge sharing from a cost center into an ownership-generating asset]] — why people contribute