teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 6 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-30 12:41:39 +00:00
parent 03d1ebf0e2
commit f6ae50c463
1 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
inbox/archive/general/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-statement-on-p2p-polymarket-betting-contro.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram-contribution
title: "Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder add"
author: "@m3taversal"
date: 2026-03-30
domain: internet-finance
format: contribution
status: processed
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: source-submission
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'governance']
---
# Source: Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder b
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
## Verbatim User Message
@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze
## Rio's Context
Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder betting on own ICO outcome on Polymarket, states they would have pushed against it if known earlier, describes intervention approach. https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 — attributed to @m3taversal