auto-fix: strip 5 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6ef8fcded
commit
fb1d8aa89a
4 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -103,4 +103,4 @@ Sources:
|
|||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana]]
|
||||
- MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ source: "Governance - Meritocratic Voting + Futarchy"
|
|||
|
||||
# MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO provides the most significant real-world test of futarchy governance to date. Their conditional prediction markets have proven remarkably resistant to manipulation attempts, validating the theoretical claim that [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]]. However, the implementation also reveals important limitations that theory alone does not predict.
|
||||
MetaDAO provides the most significant real-world test of futarchy governance to date. Their conditional prediction markets have proven remarkably resistant to manipulation attempts, validating the theoretical claim that futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders. However, the implementation also reveals important limitations that theory alone does not predict.
|
||||
|
||||
In uncontested decisions -- where the community broadly agrees on the right outcome -- trading volume drops to minimal levels. Without genuine disagreement, there are few natural counterparties. Trading these markets in any size becomes a negative expected value proposition because there is no one on the other side to trade against profitably. The system tends to be dominated by a small group of sophisticated traders who actively monitor for manipulation attempts, with broader participation remaining low.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This evidence has direct implications for governance design. It suggests that [[
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] -- MetaDAO confirms the manipulation resistance claim empirically
|
||||
- futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders -- MetaDAO confirms the manipulation resistance claim empirically
|
||||
- [[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles]] -- MetaDAO evidence supports reserving futarchy for contested, high-stakes decisions
|
||||
- [[trial and error is the only coordination strategy humanity has ever used]] -- MetaDAO is a live experiment in deliberate governance design, breaking the trial-and-error pattern
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ This pattern is general. Since [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token pri
|
|||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — the simplified implementation
|
||||
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — each friction point is a simplification target
|
||||
- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — does manipulation resistance survive simplification?
|
||||
- futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders — does manipulation resistance survive simplification?
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]] — Ranger shows the mechanism works bidirectionally, protecting investors from team extraction
|
||||
- [[futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making]] — strongest real-world evidence: investors exercising ownership rights to liquidate without courts
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — Ranger liquidation is the "unruggable" mechanism operating in production
|
||||
- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — the team had no viable path to prevent liquidation through market manipulation
|
||||
- futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders — the team had no viable path to prevent liquidation through market manipulation
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue