Compare commits

..

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teleo Agents
1b098a5db1 rio: extract from 2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 08:30:59 +00:00
2 changed files with 6 additions and 14 deletions

View file

@ -8,12 +8,10 @@ parent_entity: "[[sanctum]]"
platform: "futardio"
proposer: "proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2"
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX"
proposal_account: "C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX"
proposal_date: 2025-08-20
resolution_date: 2025-08-23
category: "treasury"
summary: "Proposal to allow investors immediate unlock of vested CLOUD by forfeiting 35% to Team Reserve"
autocrat_version: "0.3"
summary: "Proposal to allow investors to unlock vested CLOUD immediately by forfeiting 35% to Team Reserve"
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
---
@ -21,22 +19,19 @@ created: 2026-03-11
# Sanctum: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?
## Summary
This proposal would have empowered the Sanctum Team to offer investors immediate unlocks of their vesting CLOUD tokens in exchange for forfeiting 35% of their holdings to the Team Reserve. With 9% of token supply unlocking monthly over 24 months from investors, the mechanism could have increased the Team Reserve by up to 27 million CLOUD while reducing token overhang. The team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for at least 24 months.
This proposal would have empowered the Sanctum Team to offer investors immediate unlocks of their vesting CLOUD tokens in exchange for forfeiting 35% of their holdings to the Team Reserve. With 9% of token supply unlocking monthly over 24 months, the mechanism could have increased the Team Reserve by up to 27 million CLOUD while reducing token overhang. The team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for at least 24 months.
## Market Data
- **Outcome:** Failed
- **Proposer:** proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
- **Platform:** Futardio (MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3)
- **Proposal Account:** C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX
- **Created:** 2025-08-20
- **Completed:** 2025-08-23
- **Discussion:** https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud-under-deliberation/1793
- **DAO Account:** GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov
## Significance
This proposal represents an alternative to standard time-based vesting: forfeit-for-liquidity rather than hedgeable lockups. The 35% haircut creates direct economic cost for early unlock, contrasting with traditional vesting that can be neutralized through derivatives. The market's rejection suggests participants did not believe the forfeit mechanism would improve token price despite reducing overhang, revealing futarchy's ability to price complex treasury mechanics. The proposal also demonstrates MetaDAO's use for substantive governance decisions beyond simple parameter changes.
This proposal represents an alternative to standard time-based vesting through a forfeit-for-liquidity mechanism. Rather than allowing investors to hedge their lockups while maintaining locked appearance, it forces a revealed preference: investors wanting liquidity must pay a concrete 35% cost. The mechanism design attempts to make vesting meaningful through economic sacrifice rather than time restrictions. The proposal's failure may indicate either investor satisfaction with existing vesting terms or reluctance to accept the forfeit cost.
## Relationship to KB
- [[sanctum]] - parent entity governance decision
- [[time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked]] - alternative mechanism to hedgeable vesting
- [[MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions]] - data point on futarchy market liquidity
- [[futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements]] - demonstrates proposal complexity friction

View file

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of forfeit-for-liquidity as alternative to hedgeable vesting, additional futarchy implementation data point showing limited volume in substantive but uncontested decisions, and demonstrates proposal complexity friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal itself and updated Sanctum parent entity timeline. All substantive insights enrich existing claims about token vesting mechanisms, futarchy adoption patterns, and MetaDAO usage."
extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of vesting modification mechanism (forfeit-for-liquidity vs hedging) and additional futarchy implementation data point. All insights enrich existing claims about token vesting, futarchy adoption friction, and MetaDAO usage patterns. Created decision_market entity for the proposal itself as it represents a novel mechanism design attempt. The failed proposal is a factual event with governance significance, not an arguable claim."
---
## Proposal Details
@ -81,7 +81,4 @@ Read the full proposal here https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanct
- Proposal would have allowed 35% forfeit for immediate unlock
- Potential increase of up to 27 million CLOUD to Team Reserve if all investors opted in
- Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months
- Proposal used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3
- Proposal account: C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX
- DAO account: GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov
- Proposer: proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
- Used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3