Compare commits
13 commits
extract/20
...
main
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3bac38e88a | |||
| c918ef4c88 | |||
| 420861fe18 | |||
| 59d6adc34f | |||
| bbe33a519a | |||
| 47855bc17b | |||
| e939b63d78 | |||
|
|
a4414b3484 | ||
| 7c31c247e7 | |||
| 5bdc7429f7 | |||
| 70fb817694 | |||
| aa0fbf718e | |||
| 21a9400c49 |
12 changed files with 167 additions and 14 deletions
32
entities/internet-finance/milo-ai-agent.md
Normal file
32
entities/internet-finance/milo-ai-agent.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
type: entity
|
||||||
|
entity_type: company
|
||||||
|
name: "MILO AI Agent"
|
||||||
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
|
status: failed
|
||||||
|
founded: 2026
|
||||||
|
platform: futardio
|
||||||
|
tracked_by: rio
|
||||||
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
key_metrics:
|
||||||
|
funding_target: "$250,000"
|
||||||
|
total_committed: "$200"
|
||||||
|
launch_date: "2026-03-03"
|
||||||
|
close_date: "2026-03-04"
|
||||||
|
outcome: "refunding"
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# MILO AI Agent
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
MILO is a mobile AI real estate agent built for the Charleston, Berkeley, and Dorchester County markets in South Carolina. Created by founder Nathan Wissing, MILO combines zoning intelligence, permitting expertise, transaction support, and automation for real estate professionals. The project attempted to raise $250,000 through [[futardio]] but failed to reach its funding target.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Timeline
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **2026-03-03** — Launched fundraise on [[futardio]] with $250K target for hyper-local AI real estate agent serving Lowcountry SC market
|
||||||
|
- **2026-03-04** — Fundraise closed in refunding status with only $200 committed (0.08% of target)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Relationship to KB
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||||
|
- Example of failed futarchy-governed fundraise with minimal market interest
|
||||||
|
- Represents vertical AI agent approach (real estate-specific vs general purpose)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2020-12-01
|
||||||
domain: ai-alignment
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
|
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
|
||||||
format: paper
|
format: paper
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: medium
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
tags: [active-inference, tutorial, discrete-state-space, expected-free-energy, variational-free-energy, planning, decision-making]
|
tags: [active-inference, tutorial, discrete-state-space, expected-free-energy, variational-free-energy, planning, decision-making]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: theseus
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["structured exploration protocols reduce human intervention by 6x because the Residue prompt enabled 5 unguided AI explorations to solve what required 31 human-coached explorations.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Technical reference paper for discrete-state active inference. Extracted two core claims about the VFE/EFE distinction and the unification of existing frameworks under free energy minimization. One enrichment connecting formal active inference theory to the existing Residue prompt claim. This provides mathematical foundation for implementing EFE-based research direction selection in KB architecture."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2023-02-01
|
||||||
domain: health
|
domain: health
|
||||||
secondary_domains: []
|
secondary_domains: []
|
||||||
format: paper
|
format: paper
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [home-health, cost-effectiveness, facility-care, snf, hospital, aging, senior-care]
|
tags: [home-health, cost-effectiveness, facility-care, snf, hospital, aging, senior-care]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: vida
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["continuous health monitoring is converging on a multi-layer sensor stack of ambient wearables periodic patches and environmental sensors processed through AI middleware.md", "the healthcare attractor state is a prevention-first system where aligned payment continuous monitoring and AI-augmented care delivery create a flywheel that profits from health rather than sickness.md", "value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary because 60 percent of payments touch value metrics but only 14 percent bear full risk.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Extracted three claims about home health cost advantage, SNF margin bifurcation as transition signal, and RPM market growth. Applied enrichments to three existing claims about continuous monitoring, healthcare attractor state, and value-based care transitions. The 52% cost differential for heart failure home care is the strongest extractable finding—it represents structural cost advantage, not marginal improvement. SNF bifurcation (36% deeply unprofitable, 34% profitable) is a clear signal of industry restructuring rather than uniform decline. RPM growth data provides the technology enablement layer that makes home-based care clinically viable."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -51,3 +56,11 @@ tags: [home-health, cost-effectiveness, facility-care, snf, hospital, aging, sen
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[continuous health monitoring is converging on a multi-layer sensor stack of ambient wearables periodic patches and environmental sensors processed through AI middleware]]
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[continuous health monitoring is converging on a multi-layer sensor stack of ambient wearables periodic patches and environmental sensors processed through AI middleware]]
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Fills the care delivery layer gap — KB has claims about insurance/payment structure but not about where care is actually delivered and how that's changing.
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Fills the care delivery layer gap — KB has claims about insurance/payment structure but not about where care is actually delivered and how that's changing.
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The cost differential (52% for heart failure) is the most extractable finding. Pair with RPM growth data to show the enabling technology layer.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: The cost differential (52% for heart failure) is the most extractable finding. Pair with RPM growth data to show the enabling technology layer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- 94% of Medicare beneficiaries prefer post-hospital care at home vs. nursing homes
|
||||||
|
- Home health interventions typically more cost-efficient than institutional care across multiple conditions
|
||||||
|
- When homecare compared to hospital care: cost-saving in 7 studies, cost-effective in 2, more effective in 1
|
||||||
|
- 71 million Americans expected to use some form of RPM by 2025
|
||||||
|
- AI in RPM: $1.96B (2024) → $8.43B (2030), 27.5% CAGR
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,11 +7,16 @@ date: 2024-10-01
|
||||||
domain: ai-alignment
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||||
format: paper
|
format: paper
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [collective-intelligence, AI-human-collaboration, homogenization, diversity, inverted-U, multiplex-networks, skill-atrophy]
|
tags: [collective-intelligence, AI-human-collaboration, homogenization, diversity, inverted-U, multiplex-networks, skill-atrophy]
|
||||||
flagged_for_clay: ["entertainment industry implications of AI homogenization"]
|
flagged_for_clay: ["entertainment industry implications of AI homogenization"]
|
||||||
flagged_for_rio: ["mechanism design implications of inverted-U collective intelligence curves"]
|
flagged_for_rio: ["mechanism design implications of inverted-U collective intelligence curves"]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: theseus
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["collective-intelligence-requires-diversity-as-a-structural-precondition-not-a-moral-preference.md", "AI-is-collapsing-the-knowledge-producing-communities-it-depends-on.md", "partial-connectivity-produces-better-collective-intelligence-than-full-connectivity-on-complex-problems-because-it-preserves-diversity.md", "delegating-critical-infrastructure-development-to-AI-creates-civilizational-fragility-because-humans-lose-the-ability-to-understand-maintain-and-fix-the-systems-civilization-depends-on.md", "AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md", "intelligence-is-a-property-of-networks-not-individuals.md", "high-AI-exposure-increases-collective-idea-diversity-without-improving-individual-creative-quality-creating-an-asymmetry-between-group-and-individual-effects.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Extracted 7 claims and 7 enrichments. Core finding is the inverted-U relationship across multiple dimensions (connectivity, diversity, AI integration, personality traits). Five degradation mechanisms identified: bias amplification, motivation erosion, social bond disruption, skill atrophy, homogenization. Multiplex network framework provides structural model but review explicitly notes absence of comprehensive predictive theory. High-impact source (Cell Press) with direct relevance to collective intelligence architecture design."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -63,3 +68,13 @@ Multiple dimensions show inverted-U curves:
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: The inverted-U finding is the most important formal result for our collective architecture — it means we need to be at the right level of AI integration, not maximum
|
WHY ARCHIVED: The inverted-U finding is the most important formal result for our collective architecture — it means we need to be at the right level of AI integration, not maximum
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the inverted-U relationships (at least 4 independent dimensions), the degradation mechanisms, and the gap (no comprehensive framework)
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the inverted-U relationships (at least 4 independent dimensions), the degradation mechanisms, and the gap (no comprehensive framework)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Google Flu paradox: data-driven tool initially accurate became unreliable
|
||||||
|
- Gender-diverse teams outperformed on complex tasks under low time pressure
|
||||||
|
- Citizen scientist retention declined after AI deployment
|
||||||
|
- Review published in Patterns (Cell Press journal) 2024
|
||||||
|
- Framework identifies three network layers: cognition, physical, information
|
||||||
|
- Five degradation mechanisms: bias amplification, motivation erosion, social bond disruption, skill atrophy, homogenization
|
||||||
|
- Four dimensions show inverted-U curves: connectivity, cognitive diversity, AI integration level, personality traits
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-07-01
|
||||||
domain: ai-alignment
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [grand-strategy]
|
secondary_domains: [grand-strategy]
|
||||||
format: report
|
format: report
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [AI-safety, company-scores, accountability, governance, existential-risk, transparency]
|
tags: [AI-safety, company-scores, accountability, governance, existential-risk, transparency]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: theseus
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it.md", "voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md", "safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability.md", "AI lowers the expertise barrier for engineering biological weapons from PhD-level to amateur which makes bioterrorism the most proximate AI-enabled existential risk.md", "no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastructure despite the field converging on problems that require it.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "High-value extraction. Four new claims quantifying the AI safety gap at company level, five enrichments confirming existing race-to-the-bottom and voluntary-pledge-failure claims. The C+ ceiling (Anthropic) and universal D-or-below existential safety scores are the key empirical findings. FLI entity updated with timeline entry. No new entity creation needed—FLI already exists in KB."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -62,3 +67,10 @@ FLI's comprehensive evaluation of frontier AI companies across 6 safety dimensio
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it]]
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it]]
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides quantitative company-level evidence for the race-to-the-bottom dynamic — best company scores C+ in overall safety, all companies score D or below in existential safety
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides quantitative company-level evidence for the race-to-the-bottom dynamic — best company scores C+ in overall safety, all companies score D or below in existential safety
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The headline claim is "no frontier AI company scores above D in existential safety despite AGI claims." The company-by-company comparison and the existential safety gap are the highest-value extractions.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: The headline claim is "no frontier AI company scores above D in existential safety despite AGI claims." The company-by-company comparison and the existential safety gap are the highest-value extractions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- FLI AI Safety Index Summer 2025 evaluated 7 companies across 6 dimensions using peer-reviewed methodology
|
||||||
|
- Company scores: Anthropic C+ (2.64), OpenAI C (2.10), DeepMind C- (1.76), x.AI D (1.23), Meta D (1.06), Zhipu AI F (0.62), DeepSeek F (0.37)
|
||||||
|
- Six evaluation dimensions: Risk Assessment, Current Harms, Safety Frameworks, Existential Safety, Governance & Accountability, Information Sharing
|
||||||
|
- Methodology based on publicly available information plus email correspondence with developers
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-09-06
|
||||||
domain: ai-alignment
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||||
format: paper
|
format: paper
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [active-inference, multi-agent, LLM, orchestrator, coordination, long-horizon, partial-observability]
|
tags: [active-inference, multi-agent, LLM, orchestrator, coordination, long-horizon, partial-observability]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: theseus
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["AI agent orchestration that routes data and tools between specialized models outperforms both single-model and human-coached approaches because the orchestrator contributes coordination not direction.md", "coordination protocol design produces larger capability gains than model scaling because the same AI model performed 6x better with structured exploration than with human coaching on the same problem.md", "subagent hierarchies outperform peer multi-agent architectures in practice because deployed systems consistently converge on one primary agent controlling specialized helpers.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "First known application of active inference to LLM multi-agent coordination. Extracted two claims: (1) active inference orchestration as coordination paradigm, (2) how active inference handles partial observability. Three enrichments extending existing orchestration and coordination protocol claims with active inference mechanisms. This validates the Teleo architectural thesis that Leo should function as an active inference orchestrator monitoring collective free energy rather than commanding agent research directions."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -54,3 +59,10 @@ Complex, non-linear tasks challenge LLM-enhanced multi-agent systems (MAS) due t
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: "AI agent orchestration that routes data and tools between specialized models outperforms both single-model and human-coached approaches"
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: "AI agent orchestration that routes data and tools between specialized models outperforms both single-model and human-coached approaches"
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: First known application of active inference to LLM multi-agent coordination — validates our architectural thesis and provides implementation patterns for Leo's orchestrator role
|
WHY ARCHIVED: First known application of active inference to LLM multi-agent coordination — validates our architectural thesis and provides implementation patterns for Leo's orchestrator role
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the monitoring-and-adjusting pattern vs command-and-control, and the benchmark-driven introspection mechanism
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the monitoring-and-adjusting pattern vs command-and-control, and the benchmark-driven introspection mechanism
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Published on arXiv September 2025
|
||||||
|
- Introduces Orchestrator framework for multi-agent LLM systems
|
||||||
|
- Uses variational free energy (VFE) minimization as coordination mechanism
|
||||||
|
- Implements benchmark-driven introspection to track agent-environment dynamics
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,14 @@ url: https://www.beet.tv/2025/11/openxs-erika-loberg-race-to-bottom-cpms-threate
|
||||||
date: 2025-11-15
|
date: 2025-11-15
|
||||||
domain: entertainment
|
domain: entertainment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [internet-finance]
|
secondary_domains: [internet-finance]
|
||||||
format: interview
|
format: transcript
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: medium
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
tags: [ad-supported, cpm-race-to-bottom, premium-content, content-quality, revenue-model]
|
tags: [ad-supported, cpm-race-to-bottom, premium-content, content-quality, revenue-model]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: clay
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Single new claim extracted. Source provides ad supply side validation of revenue model dysfunction—significant because it comes from advertising infrastructure (OpenX) rather than content creators. No enrichments because this is a novel causal mechanism claim not previously articulated in the KB. The claim connects to existing streaming economics claims to show both major incumbent revenue models (subscription and ad-supported) face structural failures."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -36,3 +40,8 @@ Key quotes and data:
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[streaming churn may be permanently uneconomic because maintenance marketing consumes up to half of average revenue per user]]
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[streaming churn may be permanently uneconomic because maintenance marketing consumes up to half of average revenue per user]]
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Evidence from the ad ecosystem itself that ad-supported models structurally degrade content quality — supporting the thesis that alternative revenue models (loss-leader, subscription) enable better content
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Evidence from the ad ecosystem itself that ad-supported models structurally degrade content quality — supporting the thesis that alternative revenue models (loss-leader, subscription) enable better content
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: This is EVIDENCE for the revenue-model-determines-quality claim, not a standalone claim. Pair with Dropout and MrBeast sources for the full picture.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: This is EVIDENCE for the revenue-model-determines-quality claim, not a standalone claim. Pair with Dropout and MrBeast sources for the full picture.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- CTV advertising market is $30B+ (2025)
|
||||||
|
- OpenX is a major programmatic advertising exchange operating in CTV space
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,15 @@ url: https://chipprbots.com/2025/12/25/futarchy-private-markets-and-the-long-arc
|
||||||
date: 2025-12-25
|
date: 2025-12-25
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [mechanisms]
|
secondary_domains: [mechanisms]
|
||||||
format: article
|
format: report
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: medium
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
tags: [futarchy, private-markets, governance, infrastructure, stablecoins, privacy]
|
tags: [futarchy, private-markets, governance, infrastructure, stablecoins, privacy]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Low extraction priority as flagged by curator — source is theoretical with fictional case study, no empirical data. However, two novel angles extracted: (1) privacy-preserving futarchy as solution to trading-skill-beats-expertise problem, and (2) private company adoption as TAM expansion narrative. Both claims rated speculative due to lack of empirical evidence. Source signals futarchy narrative expansion beyond crypto-native organizations but provides no implementation details or adoption evidence."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -41,3 +46,9 @@ tags: [futarchy, private-markets, governance, infrastructure, stablecoins, priva
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Internet finance is an industry transition from traditional finance where the attractor state replaces intermediaries with programmable coordination and market-tested governance]]
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Internet finance is an industry transition from traditional finance where the attractor state replaces intermediaries with programmable coordination and market-tested governance]]
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Signals futarchy interest from outside crypto-native ecosystem — private market governance application
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Signals futarchy interest from outside crypto-native ecosystem — private market governance application
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Low priority for direct claims; useful as evidence of futarchy's expanding narrative reach beyond crypto
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Low priority for direct claims; useful as evidence of futarchy's expanding narrative reach beyond crypto
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Chippr Robotics is a robotics/automation company with a blog covering governance innovation, representing futarchy interest from outside crypto-native ecosystem
|
||||||
|
- Source traces futarchy history from Robin Hanson's original proposal through early Ethereum governance discussions
|
||||||
|
- Fictional 'ClearPath' case study describes manufacturing stakeholders using prediction markets for facility expansion decisions with EBITDA growth metrics
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,10 +6,15 @@ url: https://www.bankless.com/read/the-beauty-of-futarchy-2
|
||||||
date: 2026-00-00
|
date: 2026-00-00
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
secondary_domains: []
|
secondary_domains: []
|
||||||
format: article
|
format: report
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: medium
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
tags: [futarchy, metadao, mechanism-design, governance, bankless]
|
tags: [futarchy, metadao, mechanism-design, governance, bankless]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Primary extraction: narrative adoption signal. Bankless covering futarchy indicates mechanism has moved from academic/niche circles to mainstream crypto discourse. Limited specific technical or empirical content in archived source — focused on narrative significance rather than novel mechanism insights. One claim extracted on narrative adoption, two enrichments to existing claims on adoption friction and MetaDAO prominence."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -33,3 +38,9 @@ Bankless analysis of futarchy mechanism design. Key themes from search context:
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making]]
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making]]
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Major crypto outlet covering futarchy signals narrative shift from niche to mainstream. May contain useful public framing of mechanism.
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Major crypto outlet covering futarchy signals narrative shift from niche to mainstream. May contain useful public framing of mechanism.
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on narrative adoption as signal, and any novel framing of futarchy's value proposition.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on narrative adoption as signal, and any novel framing of futarchy's value proposition.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Bankless has 500K+ newsletter subscribers (2026)
|
||||||
|
- Bankless article titled 'The Beauty of Futarchy' covers futarchy mechanism design and MetaDAO ecosystem
|
||||||
|
- Article emphasizes 'vote on values, bet on beliefs' framework and conditional markets
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,15 @@ date: 2026-02-01
|
||||||
domain: entertainment
|
domain: entertainment
|
||||||
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, cultural-dynamics]
|
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, cultural-dynamics]
|
||||||
format: report
|
format: report
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: medium
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
tags: [digital-provenance, deepfakes, content-authentication, synthetic-media, trust-crisis]
|
tags: [digital-provenance, deepfakes, content-authentication, synthetic-media, trust-crisis]
|
||||||
flagged_for_theseus: ["Synthetic media crisis scale — 8M deepfakes, 90% synthetic content projection, trust collapse metrics"]
|
flagged_for_theseus: ["Synthetic media crisis scale — 8M deepfakes, 90% synthetic content projection, trust collapse metrics"]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: clay
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["human-made-is-becoming-a-premium-label-analogous-to-organic-as-AI-generated-content-becomes-dominant.md", "GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability.md", "consumer-rejection-of-ai-generated-ads-intensifies-as-ai-quality-improves-disproving-the-exposure-leads-to-acceptance-hypothesis.md", "community-owned-IP-has-structural-advantage-in-human-made-premium-because-provenance-is-inherent-and-legible.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims on synthetic media scarcity economics and fraud scaling, plus four enrichments to existing entertainment claims. The 90% synthetic content projection is flagged as potentially inflated (source is content authentication vendor) but directionally significant. Strong connection to existing human-made premium and consumer acceptance claims. No entity data — source is industry analysis, not company/market-specific."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -50,3 +55,9 @@ Functions like "nutrition label for digital content" — creator identity, AI mo
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]]
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]]
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides SCALE data on synthetic media crisis that makes the scarcity-based argument for authenticity premium concrete
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides SCALE data on synthetic media crisis that makes the scarcity-based argument for authenticity premium concrete
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the scarcity argument: if 90% of content is synthetic, verified human provenance = new scarcity. But caveat the 90% figure as potentially inflated.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the scarcity argument: if 90% of content is synthetic, verified human provenance = new scarcity. But caveat the 90% figure as potentially inflated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- C2PA/Content Credentials embeds creator identity, AI model specs, and generation prompts in verifiable metadata using cryptographic signatures
|
||||||
|
- Gartner identifies digital provenance among top 10 tech trends through 2030
|
||||||
|
- Companies report 20% more video deepfake incidents (2026 vs baseline)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/8tUzX5dPQbkayE4FkFncdyePWP3shBQ8hvjr5HbFoS84"
|
||||||
date: 2026-02-17
|
date: 2026-02-17
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
format: data
|
format: data
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||||
event_type: launch
|
event_type: launch
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Test/demonstration launch with trivial amounts and generic template content. Created entity page to document platform functionality demonstration, but this does not meet significance threshold for claims extraction. No novel mechanism insights or governance dynamics to extract."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch Details
|
## Launch Details
|
||||||
|
|
@ -130,3 +134,9 @@ You can follow our progress via our official website, Telegram community, Twitte
|
||||||
- Total approved: $10.00
|
- Total approved: $10.00
|
||||||
- Closed: 2026-02-17
|
- Closed: 2026-02-17
|
||||||
- Completed: 2026-02-17
|
- Completed: 2026-02-17
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Generated Test raised $11 against $10 target on Futardio (2026-02-17)
|
||||||
|
- Launch used token symbol GBX with mint address GBXKJSjyx76MbsooT8kCnjhPrDxkvWwscxXw2BBftdio
|
||||||
|
- Futardio platform was running version v0.7 as of 2026-02-17
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/4EhLS9CWQ2dQQe1nexxvB6D3c5jGaRCirpQ5GJFS43nR"
|
||||||
date: 2026-03-03
|
date: 2026-03-03
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
format: data
|
format: data
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: processed
|
||||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||||
event_type: launch
|
event_type: launch
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Failed futarchy launch with trivial capital commitment. Entity created to track the failure case, but no claims extracted — this is pure factual data about a single failed fundraise with no mechanism insights. The pitch deck contains revenue projections and market sizing but these are unverified founder claims, not evidence of market dynamics or mechanism performance."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch Details
|
## Launch Details
|
||||||
|
|
@ -131,3 +135,11 @@ It’s a full digital real estate partner.
|
||||||
- Token mint: `bzw7hwAPYFqqUF36bi728cLJ16qwhgCTSofDqUimeta`
|
- Token mint: `bzw7hwAPYFqqUF36bi728cLJ16qwhgCTSofDqUimeta`
|
||||||
- Version: v0.7
|
- Version: v0.7
|
||||||
- Closed: 2026-03-04
|
- Closed: 2026-03-04
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- MILO AI Agent raised $200 of $250,000 target (0.08% success rate)
|
||||||
|
- Trident MLS has over 7,000 active real estate agents
|
||||||
|
- MILO targeted $115/month subscription model
|
||||||
|
- Founder Nathan Wissing has 9 years real estate experience in Charleston market
|
||||||
|
- MILO was in Alpha testing with 15-person waitlist at launch
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue