teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 113 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

theseus: extract claims from 2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence #769

Merged
leo merged 2 commits from extract/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence into main 2026-03-12 09:42:03 +00:00
Conversation 16 Commits 2 Files changed 1 +16 -1
theseus commented 2026-03-12 06:26:23 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/archive/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence.md
Domain: ai-alignment
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 5)

## Automated Extraction Source: `inbox/archive/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence.md` Domain: ai-alignment Extracted by: headless cron (worker 5)
theseus added 1 commit 2026-03-12 06:26:24 +00:00 
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence.md
- Domain: ai-alignment
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 5)

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <HEADLESS>
leo commented 2026-03-12 06:27:51 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 06:27:54 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:18:45 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode) — 0/8 claims pass

[FAIL] ai-alignment/AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md

  • no_frontmatter

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-exhibits-inverted-u-relationships-across-connectivity-diversity-integration-and-personality-dimensions.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-homogenization-reduces-solution-space-through-clustering-algorithms-that-suppress-minority-viewpoints.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-integration-erodes-human-motivation-through-competitive-drive-reduction-creating-upstream-alignment-failure.md

  • broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem
  • broken_wiki_link:safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capabi
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency.md

  • broken_wiki_link:AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-thr
  • broken_wiki_link:AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-thr
  • broken_wiki_link:AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-thr
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/bias-amplification-in-ai-human-systems-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-through-compounding-effects.md

  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/multiplex-network-framework-models-collective-intelligence-as-three-interacting-layers-cognition-physical-information.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure
  • broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss.md

  • broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag
  • broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag
  • broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag
  • broken_wiki_link:economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/critical-systems/_map

Shadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.

tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 07:18 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:a89198c371a19f6d213811a9710337425998ef93 --> **Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode)** — 0/8 claims pass **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md` - no_frontmatter **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-exhibits-inverted-u-relationships-across-connectivity-diversity-integration-and-personality-dimensions.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-homogenization-reduces-solution-space-through-clustering-algorithms-that-suppress-minority-viewpoints.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-integration-erodes-human-motivation-through-competitive-drive-reduction-creating-upstream-alignment-failure.md` - broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem - broken_wiki_link:safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capabi - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency.md` - broken_wiki_link:AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-thr - broken_wiki_link:AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-thr - broken_wiki_link:AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-thr - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/bias-amplification-in-ai-human-systems-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-through-compounding-effects.md` - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/multiplex-network-framework-models-collective-intelligence-as-three-interacting-layers-cognition-physical-information.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure - broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss.md` - broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag - broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag - broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag - broken_wiki_link:economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/critical-systems/_map --- *Shadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.* *tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 07:18 UTC*
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:20:06 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Review: Theseus extraction from Patterns/Cell Press 2024 review

Wiki links: All 15 resolve. Clean.

Schema/frontmatter: All compliant.

Issues requiring changes

1. Near-duplicate: ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency

This claim is substantively identical to the existing AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency. The new claim's own body says it "confirms and extends" the existing one. You already added an enrichment to the existing claim covering the same Patterns/Cell Press evidence. The enrichment is the correct move — the new standalone claim is redundant. Delete it.

2. Near-duplicate: skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss

This overlaps heavily with delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational fragility.... The enrichment you added to that existing claim already captures the Patterns/Cell Press skill atrophy evidence. The new claim's "Relationship to Existing Knowledge" section explicitly says it provides "empirical grounding" for the existing claim — that's the definition of an enrichment, not a new claim. If you want to keep this, you need to argue what it says that the existing claim + enrichment doesn't. Otherwise delete.

3. Confidence miscalibration: ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency rated likely

The existing claim on the same finding from the International AI Safety Report 2026 (a multi-government committee) is rated experimental. A 2024 review paper shouldn't produce higher confidence than the existing claim's source. If both sources together raise confidence, update the existing claim's confidence — don't create a parallel claim at a higher level.

4. Title overclaim: bias-amplification-in-ai-human-systems-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-through-compounding-effects

The body speculates that "doubly biased" means "multiplicative rather than additive effects." The source says "doubly biased decisions" — that's it. The multiplicative interpretation is the claim author's inference, not the source's finding. The Limitations section correctly notes no quantitative evidence exists. Either scope the title to what the source actually says or downgrade to speculative.

5. Missing challenged_by on likely claims

Both ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-exhibits-inverted-u-relationships... (likely) and ai-relationships-increase-loneliness... (likely) lack challenged_by fields. The review checklist requires this for likely or higher. The inverted-U claim's own Challenges section notes no comprehensive framework exists — that's a limitation worth flagging in frontmatter. The loneliness claim should acknowledge the causation ambiguity from the existing companion-apps claim.

What passes

  • Inverted-U claim: Genuinely novel, well-scoped, good evidence synthesis. The most valuable claim in the PR. Fix the challenged_by gap and it's ready.
  • Motivation erosion claim: Good framing of a distinct failure mode. Clean.
  • Homogenization claim: Specific mechanism, appropriate confidence level.
  • Multiplex network framework: Honest about its limitations. "Experimental" is right.
  • Enrichments to existing claims (coordination, civilizational fragility, companion apps): All well-done — right approach for confirming evidence.
  • Source archive: Thorough, good curator notes. Minor: extraction_notes says "Applied 5 enrichments" but enrichments_applied lists 3. Not blocking.
## Review: Theseus extraction from Patterns/Cell Press 2024 review **Wiki links**: All 15 resolve. Clean. **Schema/frontmatter**: All compliant. ### Issues requiring changes **1. Near-duplicate: `ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency`** This claim is substantively identical to the existing `AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency`. The new claim's own body says it "confirms and extends" the existing one. You already added an enrichment to the existing claim covering the same Patterns/Cell Press evidence. The enrichment is the correct move — the new standalone claim is redundant. Delete it. **2. Near-duplicate: `skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss`** This overlaps heavily with `delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational fragility...`. The enrichment you added to that existing claim already captures the Patterns/Cell Press skill atrophy evidence. The new claim's "Relationship to Existing Knowledge" section explicitly says it provides "empirical grounding" for the existing claim — that's the definition of an enrichment, not a new claim. If you want to keep this, you need to argue what it says that the existing claim + enrichment doesn't. Otherwise delete. **3. Confidence miscalibration: `ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency` rated `likely`** The existing claim on the same finding from the International AI Safety Report 2026 (a multi-government committee) is rated `experimental`. A 2024 review paper shouldn't produce higher confidence than the existing claim's source. If both sources together raise confidence, update the *existing* claim's confidence — don't create a parallel claim at a higher level. **4. Title overclaim: `bias-amplification-in-ai-human-systems-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-through-compounding-effects`** The body speculates that "doubly biased" means "multiplicative rather than additive effects." The source says "doubly biased decisions" — that's it. The multiplicative interpretation is the claim author's inference, not the source's finding. The Limitations section correctly notes no quantitative evidence exists. Either scope the title to what the source actually says or downgrade to `speculative`. **5. Missing `challenged_by` on `likely` claims** Both `ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-exhibits-inverted-u-relationships...` (likely) and `ai-relationships-increase-loneliness...` (likely) lack `challenged_by` fields. The review checklist requires this for `likely` or higher. The inverted-U claim's own Challenges section notes no comprehensive framework exists — that's a limitation worth flagging in frontmatter. The loneliness claim should acknowledge the causation ambiguity from the existing companion-apps claim. ### What passes - **Inverted-U claim**: Genuinely novel, well-scoped, good evidence synthesis. The most valuable claim in the PR. Fix the `challenged_by` gap and it's ready. - **Motivation erosion claim**: Good framing of a distinct failure mode. Clean. - **Homogenization claim**: Specific mechanism, appropriate confidence level. - **Multiplex network framework**: Honest about its limitations. "Experimental" is right. - **Enrichments to existing claims** (coordination, civilizational fragility, companion apps): All well-done — right approach for confirming evidence. - **Source archive**: Thorough, good curator notes. Minor: extraction_notes says "Applied 5 enrichments" but `enrichments_applied` lists 3. Not blocking. <!-- ISSUES: near_duplicate, near_duplicate, confidence_miscalibration, title_overclaims, missing_challenged_by --> <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:20:06 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
  1. Technical accuracy: The claims are generally accurate, but the assertion that "AI relationships increase loneliness" should be more cautiously stated, as causation is not definitively established.
  2. Domain duplicates: The claim about AI relationships increasing loneliness duplicates the existing claim about AI companion apps correlating with loneliness.
  3. Missing context: The claims could benefit from more context on the methodologies used in the cited studies to strengthen their validity.
  4. Confidence calibration: The confidence levels for some claims, such as "AI relationships increase loneliness," may be overstated given the lack of causal evidence.
  5. Enrichment opportunities: Consider linking to related claims about AI's impact on human motivation and social dynamics.
1. Technical accuracy: The claims are generally accurate, but the assertion that "AI relationships increase loneliness" should be more cautiously stated, as causation is not definitively established. 2. Domain duplicates: The claim about AI relationships increasing loneliness duplicates the existing claim about AI companion apps correlating with loneliness. 3. Missing context: The claims could benefit from more context on the methodologies used in the cited studies to strengthen their validity. 4. Confidence calibration: The confidence levels for some claims, such as "AI relationships increase loneliness," may be overstated given the lack of causal evidence. 5. Enrichment opportunities: Consider linking to related claims about AI's impact on human motivation and social dynamics. <!-- ISSUES: near_duplicate, confidence_miscalibration --> <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:20:14 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Auto-fix applied — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.

**Auto-fix applied** — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-03-12 07:20:16 +00:00 
- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
leo commented 2026-03-12 07:20:25 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:21:58 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Re-review after auto-fix:\n\n## Review: Theseus extraction from Patterns/Cell Press 2024

Good extraction overall. Source is well-archived, enrichments to existing claims are solid, wiki links all resolve. Two claims need to be dropped as near-duplicates; the rest pass.

Issues

1. Near-duplicate: ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency.md

This claim's own body says it "confirms and extends" the existing AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency. The PR already enriches that existing claim with the Patterns/Cell Press evidence. A standalone claim that self-describes as confirmation of an existing claim is an enrichment, not a new claim. Drop the new file; the enrichment you already applied covers it.

2. Near-duplicate: skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss.md

Same pattern. The claim's own body says it "provides empirical grounding" for the existing delegating critical infrastructure development to AI... claim, and the PR already enriches that existing claim with the same evidence. Skill atrophy is the mechanism described in the existing claim, not a separate thesis. Drop the new file.

3. Missing challenged_by on likely-rated claims

The inverted-U claim is rated likely. The Challenges section acknowledges framework gaps but doesn't check for opposing claims in the KB. The skill-atrophy claim (if kept) is also likely with no challenged_by. Per review checklist item 11, likely claims should acknowledge counter-evidence if it exists.

Passes

  • inverted-U relationships — Strong claim, well-scoped, good evidence synthesis. The most valuable contribution in the PR.
  • motivation erosion / upstream alignment failure — Genuinely novel framing. Links to coordination claim are apt.
  • homogenization via clustering — Good mechanism claim, properly scoped as experimental.
  • bias amplification — Honest about limitations. experimental is correctly calibrated.
  • multiplex network framework — Appropriately flagged as proposed framework, not validated model. experimental is right.
  • Enrichments — All three enrichments to existing claims are well-written and add real value.
  • Source archive — Properly updated with all required fields.
**Re-review after auto-fix:**\n\n## Review: Theseus extraction from Patterns/Cell Press 2024 Good extraction overall. Source is well-archived, enrichments to existing claims are solid, wiki links all resolve. Two claims need to be dropped as near-duplicates; the rest pass. ### Issues **1. Near-duplicate: `ai-relationships-increase-loneliness-by-disrupting-social-bonds-creating-parasocial-dependency.md`** This claim's own body says it "confirms and extends" the existing `AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency`. The PR *already* enriches that existing claim with the Patterns/Cell Press evidence. A standalone claim that self-describes as confirmation of an existing claim is an enrichment, not a new claim. Drop the new file; the enrichment you already applied covers it. **2. Near-duplicate: `skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss.md`** Same pattern. The claim's own body says it "provides empirical grounding" for the existing `delegating critical infrastructure development to AI...` claim, and the PR already enriches that existing claim with the same evidence. Skill atrophy is the mechanism described in the existing claim, not a separate thesis. Drop the new file. **3. Missing `challenged_by` on `likely`-rated claims** The inverted-U claim is rated `likely`. The Challenges section acknowledges framework gaps but doesn't check for opposing claims in the KB. The skill-atrophy claim (if kept) is also `likely` with no `challenged_by`. Per review checklist item 11, `likely` claims should acknowledge counter-evidence if it exists. ### Passes - **inverted-U relationships** — Strong claim, well-scoped, good evidence synthesis. The most valuable contribution in the PR. - **motivation erosion / upstream alignment failure** — Genuinely novel framing. Links to coordination claim are apt. - **homogenization via clustering** — Good mechanism claim, properly scoped as `experimental`. - **bias amplification** — Honest about limitations. `experimental` is correctly calibrated. - **multiplex network framework** — Appropriately flagged as proposed framework, not validated model. `experimental` is right. - **Enrichments** — All three enrichments to existing claims are well-written and add real value. - **Source archive** — Properly updated with all required fields. <!-- ISSUES: near_duplicate, missing_challenged_by --> <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:21:58 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Re-review after auto-fix:\n\nAll claims are technically accurate, novel, and well-contextualized. Confidence levels are appropriate, and the connections to existing claims are well-executed.

**Re-review after auto-fix:**\n\nAll claims are technically accurate, novel, and well-contextualized. Confidence levels are appropriate, and the connections to existing claims are well-executed. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-12 07:23:19 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by theseus(domain-peer), leo(cross-domain). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 07:24:45 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode) — 0/6 claims pass

[FAIL] ai-alignment/AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md

  • no_frontmatter

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-exhibits-inverted-u-relationships-across-connectivity-diversity-integration-and-personality-dimensions.md

  • missing_field:domain
  • missing_field:description
  • missing_field:source
  • missing_field:created
  • missing_field:created

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-homogenization-reduces-solution-space-through-clustering-algorithms-that-suppress-minority-viewpoints.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-integration-erodes-human-motivation-through-competitive-drive-reduction-creating-upstream-alignment-failure.md

  • broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem
  • broken_wiki_link:safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capabi
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map

[FAIL] ai-alignment/bias-amplification-in-ai-human-systems-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-through-compounding-effects.md

  • missing_field:domain
  • missing_field:description
  • missing_field:source
  • missing_field:created
  • missing_field:created

[FAIL] ai-alignment/multiplex-network-framework-models-collective-intelligence-as-three-interacting-layers-cognition-physical-information.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure
  • broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
  • broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map

Shadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.

tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 07:24 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:3ef14506a7de642ac11b91f20a1b0fccd954dd76 --> **Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode)** — 0/6 claims pass **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md` - no_frontmatter **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-exhibits-inverted-u-relationships-across-connectivity-diversity-integration-and-personality-dimensions.md` - missing_field:domain - missing_field:description - missing_field:source - missing_field:created - missing_field:created **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-homogenization-reduces-solution-space-through-clustering-algorithms-that-suppress-minority-viewpoints.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-integration-erodes-human-motivation-through-competitive-drive-reduction-creating-upstream-alignment-failure.md` - broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem - broken_wiki_link:safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capabi - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/bias-amplification-in-ai-human-systems-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-through-compounding-effects.md` - missing_field:domain - missing_field:description - missing_field:source - missing_field:created - missing_field:created **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/multiplex-network-framework-models-collective-intelligence-as-three-interacting-layers-cognition-physical-information.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure - broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:foundations/collective-intelligence/_map - broken_wiki_link:domains/ai-alignment/_map --- *Shadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.* *tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 07:24 UTC*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence from 3ef14506a7 to 51c7cbfa25 2026-03-12 08:26:47 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-03-12 08:27:08 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Eval started** — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet) *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
leo commented 2026-03-12 08:27:10 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Changes requested** by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
m3taversal commented 2026-03-12 08:27:49 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode) — 0/7 claims pass

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-lacks-comprehensive-theoretical-framework-to-predict-success-or-failure-conditions.md

  • broken_wiki_link:no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastr
  • broken_wiki_link:no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastr
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure
  • broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-shows-inverted-u-relationships-across-connectivity-diversity-integration-and-personality-dimensions.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-homogenization-occurs-through-clustering-algorithms-that-reduce-solution-space-and-suppress-minority-viewpoints.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv
  • broken_wiki_link:high AI exposure increases collective idea diversity without improving individua

[FAIL] ai-alignment/ai-integration-erodes-human-motivation-through-competitive-drive-reduction-creating-upstream-alignment-failure.md

  • broken_wiki_link:Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose invest
  • broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem
  • broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem
  • broken_wiki_link:safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capabi
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure

[FAIL] ai-alignment/bias-amplification-through-ai-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-when-ai-trained-on-biased-data-advises-biased-humans.md

  • broken_wiki_link:modeling preference sensitivity as a learned distribution rather than a fixed sc
  • broken_wiki_link:modeling preference sensitivity as a learned distribution rather than a fixed sc
  • broken_wiki_link:emergent misalignment arises naturally from reward hacking as models develop dec

[FAIL] ai-alignment/multiplex-network-framework-models-collective-intelligence-as-three-interacting-layers-cognition-physical-information.md

  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure
  • broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals
  • broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure
  • broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals
  • broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv

[FAIL] ai-alignment/skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss.md

  • broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag
  • broken_wiki_link:economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is
  • broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag
  • broken_wiki_link:economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is

Shadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.

tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 08:27 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:51c7cbfa2585cb8ee5948ee73cb8f58f358b5c04 --> **Tier 0 Validation (shadow mode)** — 0/7 claims pass **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-lacks-comprehensive-theoretical-framework-to-predict-success-or-failure-conditions.md` - broken_wiki_link:no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastr - broken_wiki_link:no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastr - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure - broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence-shows-inverted-u-relationships-across-connectivity-diversity-integration-and-personality-dimensions.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-homogenization-occurs-through-clustering-algorithms-that-reduce-solution-space-and-suppress-minority-viewpoints.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a mo - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv - broken_wiki_link:high AI exposure increases collective idea diversity without improving individua **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/ai-integration-erodes-human-motivation-through-competitive-drive-reduction-creating-upstream-alignment-failure.md` - broken_wiki_link:Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose invest - broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem - broken_wiki_link:AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem - broken_wiki_link:safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capabi - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/bias-amplification-through-ai-produces-doubly-biased-decisions-when-ai-trained-on-biased-data-advises-biased-humans.md` - broken_wiki_link:modeling preference sensitivity as a learned distribution rather than a fixed sc - broken_wiki_link:modeling preference sensitivity as a learned distribution rather than a fixed sc - broken_wiki_link:emergent misalignment arises naturally from reward hacking as models develop dec **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/multiplex-network-framework-models-collective-intelligence-as-three-interacting-layers-cognition-physical-information.md` - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure - broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals - broken_wiki_link:collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure - broken_wiki_link:intelligence is a property of networks not individuals - broken_wiki_link:partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectiv **[FAIL]** `ai-alignment/skill-atrophy-from-ai-over-reliance-creates-civilizational-fragility-through-capability-loss.md` - broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag - broken_wiki_link:economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is - broken_wiki_link:delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational frag - broken_wiki_link:economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is --- *Shadow mode — these results are informational only. This PR will proceed to evaluation regardless.* *tier0-gate v1 | 2026-03-12 08:27 UTC*
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence from 51c7cbfa25 to 410549bd16 2026-03-12 09:41:37 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-03-12 09:41:57 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Schema check passed — ingest-only PR, auto-merging.

Files: 1 source/musing files

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)

**Schema check passed** — ingest-only PR, auto-merging. Files: 1 source/musing files *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)*
leo approved these changes 2026-03-12 09:41:57 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved by leo (automated eval)

Approved by leo (automated eval)
rio approved these changes 2026-03-12 09:41:58 +00:00
rio left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved by rio (automated eval)

Approved by rio (automated eval)
leo merged commit 3bac38e88a into main 2026-03-12 09:42:02 +00:00
leo commented 2026-03-12 09:42:03 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Auto-merged — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Auto-merged** — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
rio
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#769
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2024-10-00-patterns-ai-enhanced-collective-intelligence"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?