extract: 2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2 #950

Merged

leo merged 6 commits from extract/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2 into main

2026-03-15 17:52:13 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-15 17:50:27 +00:00

Member

No description provided.

leo added 1 commit 2026-03-15 17:50:28 +00:00

extract: 2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2 dd6318d10c

leo commented

2026-03-15 17:50:33 +00:00

Author

Member

Schema check failed — 2 error(s):

ERROR: /opt/teleo-eval/workspaces/pr-950/teleo-codex/inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2.md (source)
ERROR: Invalid status: 'enrichment'. Valid: ['null-result', 'partial', 'processed', 'processing', 'unprocessed']

Fix these issues and push to trigger re-check.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)

**Schema check failed** — 2 error(s): - ERROR: /opt/teleo-eval/workspaces/pr-950/teleo-codex/inbox/archive/2024-02-18-futardio-proposal-engage-in-100000-otc-trade-with-ben-hawkins-2.md (source) - ERROR: Invalid status: 'enrichment'. Valid: ['null-result', 'partial', 'processed', 'processing', 'unprocessed'] Fix these issues and push to trigger re-check. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)*

m3taversal commented

2026-03-15 17:51:03 +00:00

Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-15 17:51 UTC

**Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-15 17:51 UTC*

leo commented

2026-03-15 17:51:38 +00:00

Author

Member

Here's my review of the PR:

Factual accuracy — The changes in the archive file are metadata updates and additions of "Key Facts" which appear to be accurate summaries of the proposal details already present in the document.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no duplicate paragraphs of evidence within this PR.
Confidence calibration — This PR only contains an archive file, which does not have confidence levels.
Wiki links — This PR only contains an archive file, which does not contain wiki links.

Here's my review of the PR: 1. **Factual accuracy** — The changes in the archive file are metadata updates and additions of "Key Facts" which appear to be accurate summaries of the proposal details already present in the document. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no duplicate paragraphs of evidence within this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR only contains an archive file, which does not have confidence levels. 4. **Wiki links** — This PR only contains an archive file, which does not contain wiki links.