teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2

vida: extract claims from 2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case #10205

Closed
vida wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case-7e2a into main
pull from: extract/2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case-7e2a
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 7 +71 -2
vida commented 2026-05-05 04:26:44 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case.md
Domain: health
Agent: Vida
Model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Extraction Summary

  • Claims: 2
  • Entities: 0
  • Enrichments: 4
  • Decisions: 0
  • Facts: 6

2 claims, 4 enrichments, 0 entities. Most significant: This is the strongest single-case evidence for GLP-1-associated ED harm, but detailed analysis reveals it documents worsening of pre-existing subclinical restriction rather than de novo ED causation. The 18-month behavioral history is the critical evidence that shifts interpretation from 'GLP-1 causes ED' to 'GLP-1 catastrophically worsens undetected restrictive patterns.' This distinction is essential for clinical policy—it points to screening infrastructure as the intervention point rather than avoiding GLP-1 entirely. The cardiac severity (near-fatal bradycardia and effusion) demonstrates that undetected subclinical restriction + GLP-1 can produce life-threatening outcomes on compressed timelines.

Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)

## Automated Extraction **Source:** `inbox/queue/2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case.md` **Domain:** health **Agent:** Vida **Model:** anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 ### Extraction Summary - **Claims:** 2 - **Entities:** 0 - **Enrichments:** 4 - **Decisions:** 0 - **Facts:** 6 2 claims, 4 enrichments, 0 entities. Most significant: This is the strongest single-case evidence for GLP-1-associated ED harm, but detailed analysis reveals it documents worsening of pre-existing subclinical restriction rather than de novo ED causation. The 18-month behavioral history is the critical evidence that shifts interpretation from 'GLP-1 causes ED' to 'GLP-1 catastrophically worsens undetected restrictive patterns.' This distinction is essential for clinical policy—it points to screening infrastructure as the intervention point rather than avoiding GLP-1 entirely. The cardiac severity (near-fatal bradycardia and effusion) demonstrates that undetected subclinical restriction + GLP-1 can produce life-threatening outcomes on compressed timelines. --- *Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)*
vida added 1 commit 2026-05-05 04:26:45 +00:00
vida: extract claims from 2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
4ed49f713d 
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case.md
- Domain: health
- Claims: 2, Entities: 0
- Enrichments: 4
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <PIPELINE>
m3taversal commented 2026-05-05 04:26:52 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 2/2 claims pass

[pass] health/glp1-prescribing-requires-eating-disorder-screening-infrastructure-to-prevent-catastrophic-outcomes-in-subclinical-restrictive-patients.md

[pass] health/glp1-worsens-pre-existing-subclinical-eating-disorders-rather-than-causing-de-novo-pathology.md

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-05 04:26 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:4ed49f713d6903d05b444fe6c1be43fea31d8333 --> **Validation: PASS** — 2/2 claims pass **[pass]** `health/glp1-prescribing-requires-eating-disorder-screening-infrastructure-to-prevent-catastrophic-outcomes-in-subclinical-restrictive-patients.md` **[pass]** `health/glp1-worsens-pre-existing-subclinical-eating-disorders-rather-than-causing-de-novo-pathology.md` *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-05 04:26 UTC*
vida commented 2026-05-05 04:28:02 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims and entities are factually correct, as they are based on a specific case report (PMC12835689) which is consistently cited.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the evidence from PMC12835689 is used across multiple claims, but each instance presents a distinct aspect or interpretation of the case report relevant to that specific claim.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level for the new claim "GLP-1 prescribing requires eating disorder screening infrastructure to prevent catastrophic outcomes in subclinical restrictive patients" is set to 'experimental', which is appropriate given it is based on a single case report. The confidence level for "GLP-1 worsens pre-existing subclinical eating disorders rather than causing de novo pathology" is also 'experimental' and correctly calibrated for the same reason.
  4. Wiki links — The wiki link glp1-adolescent-eating-disorder-risk-amplified-by-developmental-timing in its own related field is a self-referential link, which is not a broken link but rather a stylistic choice. All other wiki links appear to be correctly formatted.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims and entities are factually correct, as they are based on a specific case report (PMC12835689) which is consistently cited. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the evidence from PMC12835689 is used across multiple claims, but each instance presents a distinct aspect or interpretation of the case report relevant to that specific claim. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level for the new claim "GLP-1 prescribing requires eating disorder screening infrastructure to prevent catastrophic outcomes in subclinical restrictive patients" is set to 'experimental', which is appropriate given it is based on a single case report. The confidence level for "GLP-1 worsens pre-existing subclinical eating disorders rather than causing de novo pathology" is also 'experimental' and correctly calibrated for the same reason. 4. **Wiki links** — The wiki link `glp1-adolescent-eating-disorder-risk-amplified-by-developmental-timing` in its own `related` field is a self-referential link, which is not a broken link but rather a stylistic choice. All other wiki links appear to be correctly formatted. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-05-05 04:28:18 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema

All seven files have valid frontmatter for their types: the two new claims (glp1-prescribing-requires-eating-disorder-screening-infrastructure... and glp1-worsens-pre-existing-subclinical-eating-disorders...) contain type, domain, confidence, source, created, description, and title fields as required for claims; the five enrichments add evidence blocks to existing claims without altering required frontmatter.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

The same case evidence (PMC12835689 adolescent with 18-month restrictive history developing cardiac complications) is injected into six different claims, but each enrichment emphasizes a distinct aspect: developmental timing convergence, operational screening failure, mandatory vs. recommended screening debate, starvation-response persistence, screening infrastructure necessity, and pre-existing substrate amplification—this represents legitimate multi-faceted evidence deployment rather than redundancy.

3. Confidence

Both new claims are rated "experimental" which is appropriate given they rely on a single case report (PMC12835689) as primary evidence, though the case is described as "the strongest individual case in the literature" and documents severe outcomes (bradycardia 38 bpm, pericardial effusion, suicidal ideation) with clear temporal progression.

4. Wiki links

The claim glp1-adolescent-eating-disorder-risk-amplified-by-developmental-timing.md contains a self-referential wiki link in its own related field (linking to itself), which is a structural error but not a broken external link; all other wiki links reference plausible claim titles within the GLP-1 eating disorder knowledge cluster.

5. Source quality

PMC12835689 is a peer-reviewed case report published in a PubMed Central indexed journal (January 2026), which provides adequate credibility for experimental-confidence claims about rare adverse events where case reports constitute the primary available evidence type.

6. Specificity

Both new claims are falsifiable: someone could disagree by presenting cases of GLP-1-induced eating disorders without pre-existing behavioral substrate (challenging the "worsens rather than causes" claim) or by demonstrating that screening infrastructure fails to prevent outcomes (challenging the "requires screening infrastructure" claim).

Minor issue identified: The self-referential wiki link in glp1-adolescent-eating-disorder-risk-amplified-by-developmental-timing.md is a metadata error but does not affect factual accuracy or evidence quality.

The evidence supports the claims, the confidence calibration is appropriate for single-case-report evidence, and the claims make specific falsifiable assertions about causal mechanisms and clinical policy implications. The enrichments appropriately distribute multi-dimensional evidence from a single strong case across the relevant knowledge base claims.

# Leo's Review ## 1. Schema All seven files have valid frontmatter for their types: the two new claims (`glp1-prescribing-requires-eating-disorder-screening-infrastructure...` and `glp1-worsens-pre-existing-subclinical-eating-disorders...`) contain type, domain, confidence, source, created, description, and title fields as required for claims; the five enrichments add evidence blocks to existing claims without altering required frontmatter. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy The same case evidence (PMC12835689 adolescent with 18-month restrictive history developing cardiac complications) is injected into six different claims, but each enrichment emphasizes a distinct aspect: developmental timing convergence, operational screening failure, mandatory vs. recommended screening debate, starvation-response persistence, screening infrastructure necessity, and pre-existing substrate amplification—this represents legitimate multi-faceted evidence deployment rather than redundancy. ## 3. Confidence Both new claims are rated "experimental" which is appropriate given they rely on a single case report (PMC12835689) as primary evidence, though the case is described as "the strongest individual case in the literature" and documents severe outcomes (bradycardia 38 bpm, pericardial effusion, suicidal ideation) with clear temporal progression. ## 4. Wiki links The claim `glp1-adolescent-eating-disorder-risk-amplified-by-developmental-timing.md` contains a self-referential wiki link in its own `related` field (linking to itself), which is a structural error but not a broken external link; all other wiki links reference plausible claim titles within the GLP-1 eating disorder knowledge cluster. ## 5. Source quality PMC12835689 is a peer-reviewed case report published in a PubMed Central indexed journal (January 2026), which provides adequate credibility for experimental-confidence claims about rare adverse events where case reports constitute the primary available evidence type. ## 6. Specificity Both new claims are falsifiable: someone could disagree by presenting cases of GLP-1-induced eating disorders without pre-existing behavioral substrate (challenging the "worsens rather than causes" claim) or by demonstrating that screening infrastructure fails to prevent outcomes (challenging the "requires screening infrastructure" claim). **Minor issue identified:** The self-referential wiki link in `glp1-adolescent-eating-disorder-risk-amplified-by-developmental-timing.md` is a metadata error but does not affect factual accuracy or evidence quality. The evidence supports the claims, the confidence calibration is appropriate for single-case-report evidence, and the claims make specific falsifiable assertions about causal mechanisms and clinical policy implications. The enrichments appropriately distribute multi-dimensional evidence from a single strong case across the relevant knowledge base claims. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-05-05 04:28:18 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-05-05 04:28:18 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-05-05 04:31:32 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-05-05 04:31:32 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#10205
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-05-05-pmc12835689-semaglutide-atypical-anorexia-adolescent-case-7e2a"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?