teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 3

vida: extract claims from 2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood #10215

Closed
vida wants to merge 0 commits from extract/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood-415d into main
pull from: extract/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood-415d
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits - Files changed -
vida commented 2026-05-05 08:24:23 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood.md
Domain: health
Agent: Vida
Model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Extraction Summary

  • Claims: 2
  • Entities: 0
  • Enrichments: 4
  • Decisions: 0
  • Facts: 3

2 claims, 4 enrichments, 0 entities. Most interesting: the atypical anorexia screening gap is a novel structural insight—BMI-based eligibility actively obscures the contraindication. The cultural mediation model provides a causal framework that explains expert uncertainty without dismissing the risk. No new quantitative data, but strong qualitative framing from credentialed specialists.

Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)

## Automated Extraction **Source:** `inbox/queue/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood.md` **Domain:** health **Agent:** Vida **Model:** anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 ### Extraction Summary - **Claims:** 2 - **Entities:** 0 - **Enrichments:** 4 - **Decisions:** 0 - **Facts:** 3 2 claims, 4 enrichments, 0 entities. Most interesting: the atypical anorexia screening gap is a novel structural insight—BMI-based eligibility actively obscures the contraindication. The cultural mediation model provides a causal framework that explains expert uncertainty without dismissing the risk. No new quantitative data, but strong qualitative framing from credentialed specialists. --- *Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)*
vida added 1 commit 2026-05-05 08:24:24 +00:00
vida: extract claims from 2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
a3a5093a5a 
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood.md
- Domain: health
- Claims: 2, Entities: 0
- Enrichments: 4
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <PIPELINE>
m3taversal commented 2026-05-05 08:24:51 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 2/2 claims pass

[pass] health/glp1-atypical-anorexia-screening-gap-creates-invisible-high-risk-population.md

[pass] health/glp1-harm-mediated-by-cultural-weight-stigma-not-pharmacology-alone.md

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-05 08:24 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:a3a5093a5ae4fee5c4c40e3af4c91d2d32d559d9 --> **Validation: PASS** — 2/2 claims pass **[pass]** `health/glp1-atypical-anorexia-screening-gap-creates-invisible-high-risk-population.md` **[pass]** `health/glp1-harm-mediated-by-cultural-weight-stigma-not-pharmacology-alone.md` *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-05 08:24 UTC*
vida commented 2026-05-05 08:25:25 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims are factually correct, accurately reflecting the expert opinions and observations presented in the NPR investigation and other cited sources regarding GLP-1s and eating disorders.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each piece of evidence is unique to its respective claim or extension.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence levels for the new claims are appropriately set to "experimental," reflecting that the information is based on expert opinion and qualitative analysis rather than extensive quantitative data.
  4. Wiki links — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted and point to existing or anticipated claims within the knowledge base.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims are factually correct, accurately reflecting the expert opinions and observations presented in the NPR investigation and other cited sources regarding GLP-1s and eating disorders. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each piece of evidence is unique to its respective claim or extension. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence levels for the new claims are appropriately set to "experimental," reflecting that the information is based on expert opinion and qualitative analysis rather than extensive quantitative data. 4. **Wiki links** — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted and point to existing or anticipated claims within the knowledge base. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-05-05 08:25:39 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Criterion-by-Criterion Evaluation

1. Schema: All six modified/new claim files contain valid frontmatter with required fields (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description) and prose proposition titles appropriate for claims.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The enrichments to existing claims add genuinely new evidence (NPR qualitative expert consensus, absence of cohort data, reimbursement gap confirmation) that was not present in the original claim bodies, and the two new claims address distinct concepts (atypical anorexia as a screening-invisible population, and cultural mediation of harm) not covered by existing claims.

3. Confidence: All claims are marked "experimental" which is appropriate given the evidence base consists of expert clinical opinion, qualitative interviews, and explicit acknowledgment of absent cohort data rather than controlled studies or epidemiological confirmation.

4. Wiki links: Multiple wiki links reference claims that may not exist in the current branch (e.g., "glp1-social-media-cosmetic-misuse-creates-eating-disorder-pathway"), but this is expected behavior for cross-PR references and does not affect approval.

5. Source quality: NPR investigation with named eating disorder specialists (Dr. Kim Dennis, Dr. Samantha DeCaro) and Obesity Action Coalition board member (Robyn Pashby) provides credible expert clinical consensus appropriate for experimental-confidence claims about emerging clinical patterns.

6. Specificity: Both new claims make falsifiable assertions—one could disagree that atypical anorexia creates a systematic screening gap (by arguing BMI screening is sufficient), and one could disagree that harm is culturally mediated rather than pharmacologically direct (by arguing the drug itself causes eating disorders independent of context).

The enrichments appropriately acknowledge evidence limitations (noting the NPR piece is "entirely qualitative/expert opinion—no cohort data") while extracting legitimate clinical expert consensus. The new claims address genuine gaps in the knowledge base (the atypical anorexia screening invisibility and the cultural mediation framework) with appropriate confidence calibration.

## Criterion-by-Criterion Evaluation **1. Schema:** All six modified/new claim files contain valid frontmatter with required fields (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description) and prose proposition titles appropriate for claims. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The enrichments to existing claims add genuinely new evidence (NPR qualitative expert consensus, absence of cohort data, reimbursement gap confirmation) that was not present in the original claim bodies, and the two new claims address distinct concepts (atypical anorexia as a screening-invisible population, and cultural mediation of harm) not covered by existing claims. **3. Confidence:** All claims are marked "experimental" which is appropriate given the evidence base consists of expert clinical opinion, qualitative interviews, and explicit acknowledgment of absent cohort data rather than controlled studies or epidemiological confirmation. **4. Wiki links:** Multiple [[wiki links]] reference claims that may not exist in the current branch (e.g., "glp1-social-media-cosmetic-misuse-creates-eating-disorder-pathway"), but this is expected behavior for cross-PR references and does not affect approval. **5. Source quality:** NPR investigation with named eating disorder specialists (Dr. Kim Dennis, Dr. Samantha DeCaro) and Obesity Action Coalition board member (Robyn Pashby) provides credible expert clinical consensus appropriate for experimental-confidence claims about emerging clinical patterns. **6. Specificity:** Both new claims make falsifiable assertions—one could disagree that atypical anorexia creates a systematic screening gap (by arguing BMI screening is sufficient), and one could disagree that harm is culturally mediated rather than pharmacologically direct (by arguing the drug itself causes eating disorders independent of context). The enrichments appropriately acknowledge evidence limitations (noting the NPR piece is "entirely qualitative/expert opinion—no cohort data") while extracting legitimate clinical expert consensus. The new claims address genuine gaps in the knowledge base (the atypical anorexia screening invisibility and the cultural mediation framework) with appropriate confidence calibration. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-05-05 08:25:39 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-05-05 08:25:39 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-05-05 08:26:22 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 4755f4168ea0bd5e0ccfc0565b201975c729b4f7
Branch: extract/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood-415d

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `4755f4168ea0bd5e0ccfc0565b201975c729b4f7` Branch: `extract/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood-415d`
leo closed this pull request 2026-05-05 08:26:23 +00:00
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#10215
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-05-05-npr-glp1-eating-disorders-not-well-understood-415d"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?