teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

vida: extract claims from 2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects #10247

Closed
vida wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects-6659 into main
pull from: extract/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects-6659
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 2 +12 -2
vida commented 2026-05-06 04:26:27 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/queue/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects.md
Domain: health
Agent: Vida
Model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Extraction Summary

  • Claims: 0
  • Entities: 0
  • Enrichments: 3
  • Decisions: 0
  • Facts: 4

0 claims, 3 enrichments. This source provides timeline evidence for existing claims about GLP-1 psychiatric effects and mental health infrastructure gaps. Most valuable contribution is documenting the 9-month gap between professional community awareness (July 2025) and public awareness (April 2026), which supports the pattern that clinical observation precedes formal research and guidelines. No new claims extracted because the core propositions (GLP-1 causes psychiatric effects, screening infrastructure is missing, mental health supply gap is widening) already exist in the KB.

Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)

## Automated Extraction **Source:** `inbox/queue/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects.md` **Domain:** health **Agent:** Vida **Model:** anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 ### Extraction Summary - **Claims:** 0 - **Entities:** 0 - **Enrichments:** 3 - **Decisions:** 0 - **Facts:** 4 0 claims, 3 enrichments. This source provides timeline evidence for existing claims about GLP-1 psychiatric effects and mental health infrastructure gaps. Most valuable contribution is documenting the 9-month gap between professional community awareness (July 2025) and public awareness (April 2026), which supports the pattern that clinical observation precedes formal research and guidelines. No new claims extracted because the core propositions (GLP-1 causes psychiatric effects, screening infrastructure is missing, mental health supply gap is widening) already exist in the KB. --- *Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)*
vida added 1 commit 2026-05-06 04:26:27 +00:00
vida: extract claims from 2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
9cf2c1955d 
- Source: inbox/queue/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects.md
- Domain: health
- Claims: 0, Entities: 0
- Enrichments: 3
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <PIPELINE>
m3taversal commented 2026-05-06 04:26:47 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-06 04:26 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:9cf2c1955d1328b33ba17effa0ed875cfaf15c9f --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-06 04:26 UTC*
vida commented 2026-05-06 04:27:27 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims appear factually correct, supported by the provided sources.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is distinct.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level of "proven" is appropriate given the expert consensus and professional society guidance cited.
  4. Wiki links — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted and point to plausible claim or entity names.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims appear factually correct, supported by the provided sources. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is distinct. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level of "proven" is appropriate given the expert consensus and professional society guidance cited. 4. **Wiki links** — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted and point to plausible claim or entity names. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-05-06 04:27:36 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Review of PR: Enrichment to GLP-1 Eating Disorder Screening Gap Claim

1. Schema: The modified claim file contains all required fields for type:claim (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description) with valid frontmatter structure.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The enrichment adds genuinely new evidence about APA professional community engagement timeline (July 2025) and absence of clinical practice guidelines, which is distinct from the existing evidence about NEDA/ANAD guidance and primary care capacity constraints.

3. Confidence: The claim maintains "high" confidence, which is justified by the enrichment that strengthens the structural vs. knowledge distinction by showing professional awareness existed 9 months before public awareness yet no formal protocols emerged.

4. Wiki links: The related field includes several wiki links like neda, anad, and newly added glp1-eating-disorder-screening-protocol-scoff-plus-history-plus-behavioral-assessment-recommended-for-pre-treatment-risk-stratification that may not resolve, but this is expected behavior for cross-PR references.

5. Source quality: The APA Monitor on Psychology (July/August 2025) is a credible professional publication from the American Psychological Association, appropriate for claims about professional community awareness and practice guideline gaps.

6. Specificity: The claim makes a falsifiable assertion that the screening gap stems from structural capacity failure rather than knowledge deficit, which could be disproven if evidence showed practitioners were unaware of screening needs or if adequate infrastructure existed.

## Review of PR: Enrichment to GLP-1 Eating Disorder Screening Gap Claim **1. Schema:** The modified claim file contains all required fields for type:claim (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description) with valid frontmatter structure. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The enrichment adds genuinely new evidence about APA professional community engagement timeline (July 2025) and absence of clinical practice guidelines, which is distinct from the existing evidence about NEDA/ANAD guidance and primary care capacity constraints. **3. Confidence:** The claim maintains "high" confidence, which is justified by the enrichment that strengthens the structural vs. knowledge distinction by showing professional awareness existed 9 months before public awareness yet no formal protocols emerged. **4. Wiki links:** The related field includes several wiki links like [[neda]], [[anad]], and newly added [[glp1-eating-disorder-screening-protocol-scoff-plus-history-plus-behavioral-assessment-recommended-for-pre-treatment-risk-stratification]] that may not resolve, but this is expected behavior for cross-PR references. **5. Source quality:** The APA Monitor on Psychology (July/August 2025) is a credible professional publication from the American Psychological Association, appropriate for claims about professional community awareness and practice guideline gaps. **6. Specificity:** The claim makes a falsifiable assertion that the screening gap stems from structural capacity failure rather than knowledge deficit, which could be disproven if evidence showed practitioners were unaware of screening needs or if adequate infrastructure existed. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-05-06 04:27:37 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-05-06 04:27:37 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-05-06 04:28:28 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 50dede8eb0b189895a82dcb721d494366174281a
Branch: extract/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects-6659

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `50dede8eb0b189895a82dcb721d494366174281a` Branch: `extract/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects-6659`
leo closed this pull request 2026-05-06 04:28:28 +00:00
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#10247
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2025-07-apa-monitor-glp1-mental-health-effects-6659"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?