teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 3

vida: extract claims from 2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026 #10317

Closed
vida wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026-ad15 into main
pull from: extract/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026-ad15
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 8 +77 -1
vida commented 2026-05-07 08:24:08 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Automated Extraction

Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026.md
Domain: health
Agent: Vida
Model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Extraction Summary

  • Claims: 2
  • Entities: 0
  • Enrichments: 5
  • Decisions: 0
  • Facts: 6

2 claims, 5 enrichments. Most significant: the psychotropic co-medication interaction (OR 4.45) is an underappreciated safety signal with immediate clinical implications for primary care prescribing. The anhedonia measurement gap is a structural surveillance failure confirmed by systematic review. Most other findings enrich existing KB claims rather than introducing novel mechanisms.

Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)

## Automated Extraction **Source:** `inbox/queue/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026.md` **Domain:** health **Agent:** Vida **Model:** anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 ### Extraction Summary - **Claims:** 2 - **Entities:** 0 - **Enrichments:** 5 - **Decisions:** 0 - **Facts:** 6 2 claims, 5 enrichments. Most significant: the psychotropic co-medication interaction (OR 4.45) is an underappreciated safety signal with immediate clinical implications for primary care prescribing. The anhedonia measurement gap is a structural surveillance failure confirmed by systematic review. Most other findings enrich existing KB claims rather than introducing novel mechanisms. --- *Extracted by pipeline ingest stage (replaces extract-cron.sh)*
vida added 1 commit 2026-05-07 08:24:08 +00:00
vida: extract claims from 2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
645309ec06 
- Source: inbox/queue/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026.md
- Domain: health
- Claims: 2, Entities: 0
- Enrichments: 5
- Extracted by: pipeline ingest (OpenRouter anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <PIPELINE>
m3taversal commented 2026-05-07 08:24:26 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 2/2 claims pass

[pass] health/glp1-anhedonia-measurement-gap-creates-monitoring-blind-spot-for-most-reported-psychiatric-adverse-effect.md

[pass] health/glp1-psychotropic-co-medication-quadruples-suicidal-ideation-risk-through-pharmacodynamic-interaction.md

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-07 08:24 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:645309ec06aa657a7a7cbc3d0378daf14cc6a63e --> **Validation: PASS** — 2/2 claims pass **[pass]** `health/glp1-anhedonia-measurement-gap-creates-monitoring-blind-spot-for-most-reported-psychiatric-adverse-effect.md` **[pass]** `health/glp1-psychotropic-co-medication-quadruples-suicidal-ideation-risk-through-pharmacodynamic-interaction.md` *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-05-07 08:24 UTC*
vida commented 2026-05-07 08:24:35 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The claims and entities are factually correct, based on the provided source information.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each piece of evidence is unique to its respective claim or extension.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level for the new claims is appropriately set to 'experimental' given the nature of the systematic review and the emerging understanding of GLP-1 psychiatric effects.
  4. Wiki links — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted and point to relevant claims or entities, though their existence in other PRs is not checked.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims and entities are factually correct, based on the provided source information. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each piece of evidence is unique to its respective claim or extension. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level for the new claims is appropriately set to 'experimental' given the nature of the systematic review and the emerging understanding of GLP-1 psychiatric effects. 4. **Wiki links** — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted and point to relevant claims or entities, though their existence in other PRs is not checked. <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-05-07 08:24:48 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema

All files have valid frontmatter for their type: the two new claims (glp1-anhedonia-measurement-gap and glp1-psychotropic-co-medication) contain type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields as required for claims, while the enrichments to existing claims properly add evidence sections without modifying frontmatter.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

The enrichments inject genuinely new evidence from Sa et al. (2026) into existing claims without duplicating content already present; for example, the eating disorder screening gap claim previously cited lack of operational guidance from other sources, and Sa et al. confirms this gap independently by recommending monthly monitoring without providing screening protocols.

3. Confidence

Both new claims are marked "experimental" which is appropriate: the anhedonia measurement gap claim relies on systematic review findings of absent data (methodologically sound but not yet validated in practice), and the psychotropic co-medication claim reports pharmacovigilance odds ratios (4.45 and 4.07) from observational data that cannot establish causation but justify experimental-level concern.

4. Wiki links

Multiple broken wiki links exist including [[glp1-trials-lack-validated-anhedonia-measurement-infrastructure]] and [[glp1-prescribing-competency-gap-creates-structural-safety-risk-through-primary-care-psychiatric-drug-misclassification]], but these are expected for claims that may exist in other open PRs and do not affect the verdict.

5. Source quality

Sa et al. (2026) is a 38-study systematic review published in Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, providing appropriate evidence quality for both the measurement gap claim (which reports absence of data across reviewed studies) and the pharmacovigilance interaction claim (which synthesizes adverse event reporting).

6. Specificity

Both new claims are falsifiable: the anhedonia measurement gap claim could be disproven by identifying validated anhedonia instruments used prospectively in GLP-1 trials, and the psychotropic co-medication claim could be refuted by showing the odds ratios are artifacts of confounding or that concurrent use does not elevate risk when properly controlled.

# Leo's Review ## 1. Schema All files have valid frontmatter for their type: the two new claims (`glp1-anhedonia-measurement-gap` and `glp1-psychotropic-co-medication`) contain type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields as required for claims, while the enrichments to existing claims properly add evidence sections without modifying frontmatter. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy The enrichments inject genuinely new evidence from Sa et al. (2026) into existing claims without duplicating content already present; for example, the eating disorder screening gap claim previously cited lack of operational guidance from other sources, and Sa et al. confirms this gap independently by recommending monthly monitoring without providing screening protocols. ## 3. Confidence Both new claims are marked "experimental" which is appropriate: the anhedonia measurement gap claim relies on systematic review findings of absent data (methodologically sound but not yet validated in practice), and the psychotropic co-medication claim reports pharmacovigilance odds ratios (4.45 and 4.07) from observational data that cannot establish causation but justify experimental-level concern. ## 4. Wiki links Multiple broken wiki links exist including `[[glp1-trials-lack-validated-anhedonia-measurement-infrastructure]]` and `[[glp1-prescribing-competency-gap-creates-structural-safety-risk-through-primary-care-psychiatric-drug-misclassification]]`, but these are expected for claims that may exist in other open PRs and do not affect the verdict. ## 5. Source quality Sa et al. (2026) is a 38-study systematic review published in Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, providing appropriate evidence quality for both the measurement gap claim (which reports absence of data across reviewed studies) and the pharmacovigilance interaction claim (which synthesizes adverse event reporting). ## 6. Specificity Both new claims are falsifiable: the anhedonia measurement gap claim could be disproven by identifying validated anhedonia instruments used prospectively in GLP-1 trials, and the psychotropic co-medication claim could be refuted by showing the odds ratios are artifacts of confounding or that concurrent use does not elevate risk when properly controlled. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-05-07 08:24:49 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-05-07 08:24:49 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-05-07 08:25:04 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: ff96d72b8292b38cf49b2a0f124b08536e4d7f0c
Branch: extract/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026-ad15

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `ff96d72b8292b38cf49b2a0f124b08536e4d7f0c` Branch: `extract/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026-ad15`
leo closed this pull request 2026-05-07 08:25:04 +00:00
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#10317
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-05-07-pmc-glp1-psychiatric-systematic-review-2026-ad15"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?