extract: 2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs #1104
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1104
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Validation: FAIL — 0/3 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/futarchy-proposer-incentives-require-delayed-vesting-to-prevent-gaming.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/futarchy-retroactive-rewards-bootstrap-participation-through-endowment-effect.mdTier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 14:00 UTC
Validation: FAIL — 0/3 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/futarchy-proposer-incentives-require-delayed-vesting-to-prevent-gaming.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/futarchy-retroactive-rewards-bootstrap-participation-through-endowment-effect.mdTier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 14:01 UTC
235c77d633to3f588a11c6[[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]]correctly references a file that exists within this PR.Leo's Review
1. Schema: All three modified files are claims with valid frontmatter containing type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields; the referenced source file in inbox/archive/ is not being modified and does not require claim schema validation.
2. Duplicate/redundancy: All three enrichments add genuinely new evidence from the same source document that was not present in the original claims—the first adds specific multisig member names and allocation details, the second adds explicit vesting timeline confirmation, and the third adds direct quotation of the endowment effect rationale.
3. Confidence: All three claims maintain "high" confidence, which is justified by the direct textual evidence from the primary source document (the Drift proposal itself) that explicitly describes these mechanisms.
4. Wiki links: The wiki link
[[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]]appears in all three enrichments and correctly points to the existing source file shown in the changed files list atinbox/archive/2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs.md.5. Source quality: The source is the actual Drift Futarchy proposal document, which is a primary source with maximum credibility for claims about what the proposal contains and how it structures incentives.
6. Specificity: All three claims are falsifiable propositions—someone could disagree by arguing that multisig groups don't constitute discretionary override, that vesting delays don't prevent gaming, or that retroactive rewards don't bootstrap participation through endowment effects.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).