domains/entertainment/consumer-acceptance-of-ai-creative-content-declining-despite-quality-improvements-because-authenticity-signal-becomes-more-valuable.md

@@ -31,22 +31,28 @@ The data is specific to creator content and may not generalize to all entertainm
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-01-01-koinsights-authenticity-premium-ai-rejection]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+*Source: 2026-01-01-koinsights-authenticity-premium-ai-rejection | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
 Deloitte 2024 Connected Consumer Survey found nearly 70% of respondents are concerned AI-generated content will be used to deceive them. Approximately half of consumers now believe they can recognize AI-written content, with many disengaging when brands appear to rely heavily on it in emotionally meaningful contexts.
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2025-06-18-arxiv-fanfiction-age-of-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
+*Source: 2025-06-18-arxiv-fanfiction-age-of-ai | Added: 2026-03-18*
 
 Fanfiction community data shows rejection is VALUES-based not quality-based: 92% agree 'fanfiction is a space for human creativity' and 86% insist on AI disclosure. 58% feel 'deceived' by undisclosed AI usage. The authenticity signal (human authorship) is the primary quality criterion, making technical improvements irrelevant to acceptance.
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
+*Source: 2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms | Added: 2026-03-18*
 
 SCP Foundation—the most successful open-IP collaborative fiction project with 9,800+ objects—permanently bans AI-generated text or images in user-facing content. This is a deliberate policy choice by a community that explicitly values open IP and collaborative creation, suggesting the AI ban is about preserving human authorship as a core value, not protecting commercial interests.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2025-11-01-scp-wiki-governance-collaborative-worldbuilding-scale]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
+
+SCP Foundation's permanent ban on AI-generated content (summary deletion + permanent ban for violators) reflects community consensus that human authorship is definitional to the project's value. This is a creative community choosing human-made as identity despite AI potentially reducing production costs. The policy was implemented proactively, suggesting anticipation that AI content would undermine community trust even if quality-equivalent.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/entertainment/worldbuilding-as-narrative-infrastructure-creates-communal-meaning-through-transmedia-coordination-of-audience-experience.md

@@ -29,10 +29,16 @@ The academic framing is significant: top-tier musicology journals treating conce
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-03-18-synthesis-collaborative-fiction-governance-spectrum]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
+*Source: 2026-03-18-synthesis-collaborative-fiction-governance-spectrum | Added: 2026-03-18*
 
 SCP Foundation with 9,800+ objects and 6,300+ tales demonstrates that protocol-distributed authorship (standardized format + peer review + voting) produces coherent worldbuilding at massive scale without centralized editorial authority. The emergent canonical clusters form organically through community consensus rather than top-down coordination. This confirms that worldbuilding can scale through structural constraints rather than editorial control, though it does NOT produce linear narrative (which requires concentrated authority per the tradeoff claim).
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2025-11-01-scp-wiki-governance-collaborative-worldbuilding-scale]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
+
+SCP Foundation provides 18-year operational proof that worldbuilding can coordinate at massive scale (9,800+ objects, 6,300+ tales, 16 language branches) through protocol-based governance without central creative authority. The six structural features (fixed format, open IP, scalable contributions, passive theme, thin curation, organizational center) constitute a transferable model for narrative infrastructure. Critical insight: Staff handle infrastructure but explicitly NOT creative direction - the separation is architectural, not accidental. This demonstrates that worldbuilding-as-infrastructure can be deliberately designed through protocol rather than emerging organically.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2025-11-01-scp-wiki-governance-collaborative-worldbuilding-scale.json

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "narrative-protocols-enable-distributed-authorship-at-scale-through-standardized-format-community-voting-and-organizational-center.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "collaborative-fiction-exhibits-fundamental-tradeoff-between-editorial-distribution-and-narrative-coherence.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 2,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 2,
+    "rejected": 2,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "narrative-protocols-enable-distributed-authorship-at-scale-through-standardized-format-community-voting-and-organizational-center.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
+      "collaborative-fiction-exhibits-fundamental-tradeoff-between-editorial-distribution-and-narrative-coherence.md:set_created:2026-03-18"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "narrative-protocols-enable-distributed-authorship-at-scale-through-standardized-format-community-voting-and-organizational-center.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "collaborative-fiction-exhibits-fundamental-tradeoff-between-editorial-distribution-and-narrative-coherence.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-18"
+}

inbox/queue/2025-11-01-scp-wiki-governance-collaborative-worldbuilding-scale.md

@@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-11-01
 domain: entertainment
 secondary_domains: [ai-alignment]
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 tags: [SCP-Foundation, collaborative-fiction, governance, worldbuilding, narrative-protocol, quality-control, community-authorship, CC-BY-SA]
 flagged_for_theseus: ["SCP Foundation's 18-year protocol-based governance without central authority is a collective intelligence case study — standardized interfaces enabling distributed coordination"]
+processed_by: clay
+processed_date: 2026-03-18
+enrichments_applied: ["worldbuilding-as-narrative-infrastructure-creates-communal-meaning-through-transmedia-coordination-of-audience-experience.md", "consumer-acceptance-of-ai-creative-content-declining-despite-quality-improvements-because-authenticity-signal-becomes-more-valuable.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -75,3 +79,16 @@ Success factors identified by community analysts:
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: SCP is the most important case study for the governance spectrum claim (Session 6). 18 years of protocol-governed collaborative worldbuilding at massive scale — the existence proof that distributed authorship can produce coherent output at scale if the scope is worldbuilding (not linear narrative).
 EXTRACTION HINT: Extract the "narrative protocol" framework as a claim — the six structural features (fixed format, open IP, scalable contributions, passive theme, thin curation, organizational center) are a transferable model. Also: the staff/creative authority distinction is critical — infrastructure staff ≠ creative gatekeepers.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- SCP Foundation founded 2008, originated 2007 on 4chan
+- 9,800+ SCP objects as of late 2025
+- 6,300+ Tales as of late 2025
+- 16 language branches total
+- CC BY-SA licensed
+- Greenlight policy requires 2 experienced reviewer approvals
+- Community voting thresholds: -10 triggers deletion review, -20 enables immediate deletion
+- Staff deletion requires 3 votes + 24-hour timer
+- First SCP article was SCP-173
+- American Journalism Review 2022 called it potentially largest collaborative writing project in history