extract: 2025-01-01-aha-food-is-medicine-systematic-review-rcts #1305

Merged

leo merged 5 commits from extract/2025-01-01-aha-food-is-medicine-systematic-review-rcts into main

2026-03-18 17:53:40 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-18 17:52:02 +00:00

Member

No description provided.

leo added 1 commit 2026-03-18 17:52:02 +00:00

extract: 2025-01-01-aha-food-is-medicine-systematic-review-rcts 4efb620f17

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>

m3taversal commented

2026-03-18 17:52:30 +00:00

Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-18 17:52 UTC

**Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-18 17:52 UTC*

leo commented

2026-03-18 17:53:01 +00:00

Author

Member

Factual accuracy — The changes in the .extraction-debug file accurately reflect the processing status and rejection of a claim, and the updates to the .md file correctly add metadata and key facts related to the AHA Scientific Statement.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates as the changes involve a debug file and metadata/key facts for a single source document.
Confidence calibration — This PR does not contain any claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable.
Wiki links — This PR does not contain any wiki links.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The changes in the `.extraction-debug` file accurately reflect the processing status and rejection of a claim, and the updates to the `.md` file correctly add metadata and key facts related to the AHA Scientific Statement. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates as the changes involve a debug file and metadata/key facts for a single source document. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR does not contain any claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable. 4. **Wiki links** — This PR does not contain any wiki links.

leo commented

2026-03-18 17:53:11 +00:00

Author

Member

Review of PR: AHA Food Is Medicine Source Processing

1. Schema: The modified file is a source document (in inbox/queue/), which has a different schema than claims or entities; the frontmatter includes appropriate source metadata fields (url, author, date, domain, format, status, tags, processed_by, processed_date, extraction_model, extraction_notes) and is valid for a source file.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: No claims were extracted in this PR (1 rejected by validator per the debug file), so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection; the PR only adds processing metadata and key facts to the source file itself.

3. Confidence: Not applicable — no claims were created in this PR, only source processing occurred.

4. Wiki links: No wiki links are present in the modified content, so there are no broken links to evaluate.

5. Source quality: The source is an AHA Scientific Statement published in Circulation reviewing 14 RCTs, which represents high-quality, authoritative evidence for health domain claims about Food Is Medicine interventions.

6. Specificity: Not applicable — no claims were created in this PR to evaluate for specificity.

Additional observations: The status change from "unprocessed" to "null-result" accurately reflects that extraction was attempted but no claims passed validation; the key facts section appropriately summarizes the source content without making claims; the extraction debug file shows the claim was rejected for "missing_attribution_extractor" which is a valid technical reason.

## Review of PR: AHA Food Is Medicine Source Processing **1. Schema:** The modified file is a source document (in inbox/queue/), which has a different schema than claims or entities; the frontmatter includes appropriate source metadata fields (url, author, date, domain, format, status, tags, processed_by, processed_date, extraction_model, extraction_notes) and is valid for a source file. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** No claims were extracted in this PR (1 rejected by validator per the debug file), so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection; the PR only adds processing metadata and key facts to the source file itself. **3. Confidence:** Not applicable — no claims were created in this PR, only source processing occurred. **4. Wiki links:** No wiki links are present in the modified content, so there are no broken links to evaluate. **5. Source quality:** The source is an AHA Scientific Statement published in Circulation reviewing 14 RCTs, which represents high-quality, authoritative evidence for health domain claims about Food Is Medicine interventions. **6. Specificity:** Not applicable — no claims were created in this PR to evaluate for specificity. **Additional observations:** The status change from "unprocessed" to "null-result" accurately reflects that extraction was attempted but no claims passed validation; the key facts section appropriately summarizes the source content without making claims; the extraction debug file shows the claim was rejected for "missing_attribution_extractor" which is a valid technical reason.