inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-beers-toner-pet-ai-external-scrutiny.json

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "privacy-enhancing-technologies-enable-independent-ai-scrutiny-without-ip-compromise-but-legal-authority-to-require-scrutiny-does-not-exist.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 1,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 4,
+    "rejected": 1,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "privacy-enhancing-technologies-enable-independent-ai-scrutiny-without-ip-compromise-but-legal-authority-to-require-scrutiny-does-not-exist.md:set_created:2026-03-19",
+      "privacy-enhancing-technologies-enable-independent-ai-scrutiny-without-ip-compromise-but-legal-authority-to-require-scrutiny-does-not-exist.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
+      "privacy-enhancing-technologies-enable-independent-ai-scrutiny-without-ip-compromise-but-legal-authority-to-require-scrutiny-does-not-exist.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front",
+      "privacy-enhancing-technologies-enable-independent-ai-scrutiny-without-ip-compromise-but-legal-authority-to-require-scrutiny-does-not-exist.md:stripped_wiki_link:safe-AI-development-requires-building-alignment-mechanisms-b"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "privacy-enhancing-technologies-enable-independent-ai-scrutiny-without-ip-compromise-but-legal-authority-to-require-scrutiny-does-not-exist.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-19"
+}

inbox/queue/2025-02-00-beers-toner-pet-ai-external-scrutiny.md

@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-02-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 tags: [evaluation-infrastructure, privacy-enhancing-technologies, OpenMined, external-scrutiny, Christchurch-Call, AISI, deployed]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-19
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 1 claims, 1 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -53,3 +57,11 @@ PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms
 WHY ARCHIVED: Provides evidence that the technical barrier to independent AI evaluation is solvable. The key insight — technology ready, legal framework missing — precisely locates the bottleneck in evaluation infrastructure development.
 
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the technology-law gap: PET infrastructure works (two deployments), but legal authority to require frontier AI labs to submit to independent evaluation doesn't exist. This is the specific intervention point.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Helen Toner was Director of Strategy at CISA
+- Helen Toner is at Georgetown
+- The Christchurch Call is a voluntary initiative
+- UK AI Safety Institute has conducted frontier model evaluations using PET infrastructure
+- The paper was published February 2025