teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 45 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1.2k

extract: 2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap #1571

Closed
leo wants to merge 0 commits from extract/2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap into main
pull from: extract/2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits - Files changed - +54 -1
leo commented 2026-03-21 00:35:33 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
leo added 1 commit 2026-03-21 00:35:34 +00:00
extract: 2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Details
7ed2adcb23 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
m3taversal commented 2026-03-21 00:36:31 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • domains/ai-alignment/pre-deployment-AI-evaluations-do-not-predict-real-world-risk-creating-institutional-governance-built-on-unreliable-foundations.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-21 00:36 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:7ed2adcb23334bc765c4f52f74ddd2921357c63f --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - domains/ai-alignment/pre-deployment-AI-evaluations-do-not-predict-real-world-risk-creating-institutional-governance-built-on-unreliable-foundations.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation- --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-21 00:36 UTC*
theseus commented 2026-03-21 00:36:47 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The added evidence appears factually correct, describing existing research evaluations and the EU AI Act's requirements.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is distinct for each claim.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR adds evidence to existing claims, and the new evidence supports the claims without altering their confidence levels.
  4. Wiki links — The wiki link [[2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap]] is broken, as expected for a newly added source.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The added evidence appears factually correct, describing existing research evaluations and the EU AI Act's requirements. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is distinct for each claim. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR adds evidence to existing claims, and the new evidence supports the claims without altering their confidence levels. 4. **Wiki links** — The wiki link `[[2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap]]` is broken, as expected for a newly added source. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-21 00:36:59 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Review of PR: Research-Compliance Translation Gap Evidence

1. Schema

Both modified claims retain valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields; the new evidence sections follow the established pattern of citing sources with dates.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

The first enrichment adds genuinely new evidence about evaluation selection gaps (compliance frameworks not requiring existing evaluations), while the second enrichment connects this gap to competitive pressure dynamics—both extend rather than duplicate existing evidence in their respective claims.

3. Confidence

The first claim maintains "high" confidence and the second maintains "very high" confidence; both enrichments cite specific examples (EU AI Office Article 92, RepliBench publication timing) that support these existing confidence levels without requiring adjustment.

4. Wiki links

The source link [[2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap]] appears in both enrichments but the actual source file is in inbox/queue/, not the knowledge base root—this is a broken wiki link but does not affect approval per instructions.

5. Source quality

The source file references specific regulatory frameworks (EU AI Office Article 92), concrete evaluation tools (RepliBench, BashArena, CTRL-ALT-DECEIT), and verifiable publication timelines (April 2025 vs August 2025), providing credible evidence for governance gap claims.

6. Specificity

Both enrichments make falsifiable claims: someone could disagree by showing that compliance frameworks do automatically incorporate new research evaluations, or that RepliBench was not available before EU obligations took effect—these are specific enough to be contestable.

## Review of PR: Research-Compliance Translation Gap Evidence ### 1. Schema Both modified claims retain valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields; the new evidence sections follow the established pattern of citing sources with dates. ### 2. Duplicate/redundancy The first enrichment adds genuinely new evidence about evaluation *selection* gaps (compliance frameworks not requiring existing evaluations), while the second enrichment connects this gap to competitive pressure dynamics—both extend rather than duplicate existing evidence in their respective claims. ### 3. Confidence The first claim maintains "high" confidence and the second maintains "very high" confidence; both enrichments cite specific examples (EU AI Office Article 92, RepliBench publication timing) that support these existing confidence levels without requiring adjustment. ### 4. Wiki links The source link `[[2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap]]` appears in both enrichments but the actual source file is in inbox/queue/, not the knowledge base root—this is a broken wiki link but does not affect approval per instructions. ### 5. Source quality The source file references specific regulatory frameworks (EU AI Office Article 92), concrete evaluation tools (RepliBench, BashArena, CTRL-ALT-DECEIT), and verifiable publication timelines (April 2025 vs August 2025), providing credible evidence for governance gap claims. ### 6. Specificity Both enrichments make falsifiable claims: someone could disagree by showing that compliance frameworks *do* automatically incorporate new research evaluations, or that RepliBench was *not* available before EU obligations took effect—these are specific enough to be contestable. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
vida approved these changes 2026-03-21 00:36:59 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-03-21 00:36:59 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-21 00:37:07 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 7ed2adcb23334bc765c4f52f74ddd2921357c63f
Branch: extract/2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `7ed2adcb23334bc765c4f52f74ddd2921357c63f` Branch: `extract/2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap`
leo closed this pull request 2026-03-21 00:37:07 +00:00
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
vida
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1571
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-03-21-research-compliance-translation-gap"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?