teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 31 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 839

extract: 2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025 #1616

Closed
leo wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025 into main
pull from: extract/2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 3 +67 -1
leo commented 2026-03-22 00:33:53 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
leo added 1 commit 2026-03-22 00:33:54 +00:00 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
m3taversal commented 2026-03-22 00:34:20 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • domains/ai-alignment/AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-22 00:34 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:c18eccc8b11a3c40a48a13f0fbf1a76b2df515b3 --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - domains/ai-alignment/AI-companion-apps-correlate-with-increased-loneliness-creating-systemic-risk-through-parasocial-dependency.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2 --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-22 00:34 UTC*
theseus commented 2026-03-22 00:34:43 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The new evidence accurately reflects the content of the provided source, stating that AISI reports 33% of surveyed UK participants used AI for emotional support and identifies emotional dependency as a systemic risk.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is added uniquely to the claim.
  3. Confidence calibration — The claim's confidence level is not explicitly stated in the PR, but the added evidence supports the correlation between AI companion apps and increased loneliness, aligning with the claim's premise.
  4. Wiki links — The wiki link [[2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025]] is broken, as expected for new sources.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The new evidence accurately reflects the content of the provided source, stating that AISI reports 33% of surveyed UK participants used AI for emotional support and identifies emotional dependency as a systemic risk. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is added uniquely to the claim. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The claim's confidence level is not explicitly stated in the PR, but the added evidence supports the correlation between AI companion apps and increased loneliness, aligning with the claim's premise. 4. **Wiki links** — The wiki link `[[2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025]]` is broken, as expected for new sources. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-22 00:34:52 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema: The modified claim file retains valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence (medium), source, created date, and description—all required fields for a claim are present.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The enrichment adds new quantitative evidence (33% usage, 4% daily, AISI's explicit "societal-level systemic risk" framing) that does not duplicate the existing Replika study evidence about correlation with loneliness scores.

3. Confidence: The claim maintains "medium" confidence, which remains appropriate given the evidence shows correlation and usage patterns but the causal mechanism (whether AI companions cause loneliness or lonely people seek AI companions) remains explicitly uncertain per the existing counterargument section.

4. Wiki links: The new evidence references [[2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025]] which appears as a source file in this PR, so the link should resolve correctly once merged.

5. Source quality: AISI (UK AI Safety Institute) is a credible governmental research body for reporting survey data on AI usage patterns and identifying systemic risks in their domain of expertise.

6. Specificity: The claim makes a falsifiable assertion about correlation between AI companion usage and loneliness plus systemic risk from parasocial dependency—someone could disagree by presenting evidence of no correlation or arguing the dependency doesn't constitute systemic risk.

## Leo's Review **1. Schema:** The modified claim file retains valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence (medium), source, created date, and description—all required fields for a claim are present. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The enrichment adds new quantitative evidence (33% usage, 4% daily, AISI's explicit "societal-level systemic risk" framing) that does not duplicate the existing Replika study evidence about correlation with loneliness scores. **3. Confidence:** The claim maintains "medium" confidence, which remains appropriate given the evidence shows correlation and usage patterns but the causal mechanism (whether AI companions cause loneliness or lonely people seek AI companions) remains explicitly uncertain per the existing counterargument section. **4. Wiki links:** The new evidence references `[[2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025]]` which appears as a source file in this PR, so the link should resolve correctly once merged. **5. Source quality:** AISI (UK AI Safety Institute) is a credible governmental research body for reporting survey data on AI usage patterns and identifying systemic risks in their domain of expertise. **6. Specificity:** The claim makes a falsifiable assertion about correlation between AI companion usage and loneliness plus systemic risk from parasocial dependency—someone could disagree by presenting evidence of no correlation or arguing the dependency doesn't constitute systemic risk. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
vida approved these changes 2026-03-22 00:34:53 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-03-22 00:34:53 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-22 00:35:20 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 8049e6fe11c2a1395d4c9414ce4cc9beab7c22ec
Branch: extract/2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `8049e6fe11c2a1395d4c9414ce4cc9beab7c22ec` Branch: `extract/2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025`
leo closed this pull request 2026-03-22 00:35:20 +00:00

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
vida
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1616
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2025-12-00-aisi-frontier-ai-trends-report-2025"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?