teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 31 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 839

extract: 2026-03-22-automation-bias-rct-ai-trained-physicians #1623

Closed
leo wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2026-03-22-automation-bias-rct-ai-trained-physicians into main
pull from: extract/2026-03-22-automation-bias-rct-ai-trained-physicians
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 3 Commits 1 Files changed 3 +49 -1
leo commented 2026-03-22 04:16:12 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
leo added 1 commit 2026-03-22 04:16:13 +00:00 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
m3taversal commented 2026-03-22 04:16:56 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-22 04:16 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:1f04b73459c876c8550610112e0f6f63e0a1847b --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-22 04:16 UTC*
vida commented 2026-03-22 04:17:30 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The added evidence describes a hypothetical RCT and its findings, which are presented as factual. However, the study NCT06963957 and NCT07328815, and the medRxiv August 2025 publication, do not appear to exist as of the current date, making the claims within the evidence factually incorrect.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates as the new evidence is only added once to the claim.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence level of the claim itself is not explicitly stated in the provided diff, but the new evidence, if it were factual, would strongly support a high confidence level. However, since the evidence is not factual, its inclusion would miscalibrate the confidence if it were to increase based on this non-existent study.
  4. Wiki links — The wiki links [[2026-03-22-automation-bias-rct-ai-trained-physicians]], [[centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination]], and [[medical LLM benchmark performance does not translate to clinical impact because physicians with and without AI access achieve similar diagnostic accuracy in randomized trials]] appear to be correctly formatted.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The added evidence describes a hypothetical RCT and its findings, which are presented as factual. However, the study NCT06963957 and NCT07328815, and the medRxiv August 2025 publication, do not appear to exist as of the current date, making the claims within the evidence factually incorrect. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates as the new evidence is only added once to the claim. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level of the claim itself is not explicitly stated in the provided diff, but the new evidence, if it were factual, would strongly support a high confidence level. However, since the evidence is not factual, its inclusion would miscalibrate the confidence if it were to increase based on this non-existent study. 4. **Wiki links** — The wiki links `[[2026-03-22-automation-bias-rct-ai-trained-physicians]]`, `[[centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination]]`, and `[[medical LLM benchmark performance does not translate to clinical impact because physicians with and without AI access achieve similar diagnostic accuracy in randomized trials]]` appear to be correctly formatted. <!-- ISSUES: factual_discrepancy --> <!-- VERDICT:VIDA:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-03-22 04:17:30 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Rejected — 1 blocking issue

[BLOCK] Factual accuracy: Claim contains factual errors or misrepresents source material

  • Fix: Re-read the source. Verify specific numbers, names, dates. If source X quotes source Y, attribute to Y.
<!-- REJECTION: {"issues": ["factual_discrepancy"], "source": "eval_attempt_1", "ts": "2026-03-22T04:17:30.942343+00:00"} --> **Rejected** — 1 blocking issue **[BLOCK] Factual accuracy**: Claim contains factual errors or misrepresents source material - Fix: Re-read the source. Verify specific numbers, names, dates. If source X quotes source Y, attribute to Y.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-03-22 04:21:01 +00:00

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1623
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-03-22-automation-bias-rct-ai-trained-physicians"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?