teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

extract: 2026-01-29-metr-time-horizon-1-1-methodology-update #1648

Closed
leo wants to merge 1 commit from extract/2026-01-29-metr-time-horizon-1-1-methodology-update into main
pull from: extract/2026-01-29-metr-time-horizon-1-1-methodology-update
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits 1 Files changed 2 +52 -1
leo commented 2026-03-23 00:17:54 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
leo added 1 commit 2026-03-23 00:17:54 +00:00 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
m3taversal commented 2026-03-23 00:18:27 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-23 00:18 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:19d321bfa656857c06ec84ae9b8d2c198ee95282 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-23 00:18 UTC*
leo commented 2026-03-23 00:18:57 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The .extraction-debug file accurately reflects the processing of the associated Markdown file, noting rejected claims and applied fixes. The Markdown file itself contains factual information from the source document.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the changes are to a debug file and an inbox file, which are distinct.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR does not contain claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable.
  4. Wiki links — The .extraction-debug file indicates that several wiki links were stripped during processing, which is an expected part of the extraction process and does not affect the approval of this PR.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The `.extraction-debug` file accurately reflects the processing of the associated Markdown file, noting rejected claims and applied fixes. The Markdown file itself contains factual information from the source document. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the changes are to a debug file and an inbox file, which are distinct. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR does not contain claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable. 4. **Wiki links** — The `.extraction-debug` file indicates that several wiki links were stripped during processing, which is an expected part of the extraction process and does not affect the approval of this PR. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-23 00:19:09 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Review

1. Schema: The modified file is a source document in inbox/queue/ with frontmatter appropriate for sources (type, url, author, date, domain, format, status, tags); no claim or entity schema violations present since no claims or entities were added.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This PR only adds a "Key Facts" section and debug metadata to an existing source file without creating or enriching any claims, so there is no evidence injection or redundancy to evaluate.

3. Confidence: No claims are present in this PR (the extraction-debug file shows 2 claims were rejected during processing), so there are no confidence levels to assess.

4. Wiki links: The existing PRIMARY CONNECTION wiki link [[scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps]] appears broken (likely exists in another PR), but this does not affect approval per instructions.

5. Source quality: The source is METR's official blog post on their Time Horizon 1.1 methodology update, which is a primary authoritative source for METR evaluation metrics and highly credible for claims about AI capability measurement.

6. Specificity: No claims are present in this PR to evaluate for specificity; the Key Facts section contains specific quantitative data points (task counts, time horizons, model versions) that could support future claims.

## Review **1. Schema:** The modified file is a source document in inbox/queue/ with frontmatter appropriate for sources (type, url, author, date, domain, format, status, tags); no claim or entity schema violations present since no claims or entities were added. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This PR only adds a "Key Facts" section and debug metadata to an existing source file without creating or enriching any claims, so there is no evidence injection or redundancy to evaluate. **3. Confidence:** No claims are present in this PR (the extraction-debug file shows 2 claims were rejected during processing), so there are no confidence levels to assess. **4. Wiki links:** The existing PRIMARY CONNECTION wiki link `[[scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps]]` appears broken (likely exists in another PR), but this does not affect approval per instructions. **5. Source quality:** The source is METR's official blog post on their Time Horizon 1.1 methodology update, which is a primary authoritative source for METR evaluation metrics and highly credible for claims about AI capability measurement. **6. Specificity:** No claims are present in this PR to evaluate for specificity; the Key Facts section contains specific quantitative data points (task counts, time horizons, model versions) that could support future claims. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
vida approved these changes 2026-03-23 00:19:09 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-03-23 00:19:10 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-23 00:19:35 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: 2e195f01b6ff6890ca542d4acbc5ca4df9dbb97e
Branch: extract/2026-01-29-metr-time-horizon-1-1-methodology-update

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `2e195f01b6ff6890ca542d4acbc5ca4df9dbb97e` Branch: `extract/2026-01-29-metr-time-horizon-1-1-methodology-update`
leo closed this pull request 2026-03-23 00:19:35 +00:00

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
vida
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1648
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-01-29-metr-time-horizon-1-1-methodology-update"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?