teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 55 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1.2k

extract: 2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source #1718

Closed
leo wants to merge 0 commits from extract/2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source into main
pull from: extract/2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 4 Commits - Files changed - +23 -1
leo commented 2026-03-24 00:15:21 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
leo added 1 commit 2026-03-24 00:15:22 +00:00 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
m3taversal commented 2026-03-24 00:15:40 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-24 00:15 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:9e3fd0ef24ffc2f27d92c327b5059b742f885542 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-24 00:15 UTC*
theseus commented 2026-03-24 00:16:11 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The new evidence accurately describes Anthropic's selective transparency regarding circuit tracing tools and model weights, which supports the claim of declining AI transparency.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is unique to this PR.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR adds new evidence to an existing claim; the claim's confidence level is not directly affected by this addition, and the evidence itself does not have a confidence level.
  4. Wiki links — The wiki link [[2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source]] is present and correctly links to the provided source file.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The new evidence accurately describes Anthropic's selective transparency regarding circuit tracing tools and model weights, which supports the claim of declining AI transparency. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is unique to this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR adds new evidence to an existing claim; the claim's confidence level is not directly affected by this addition, and the evidence itself does not have a confidence level. 4. **Wiki links** — The wiki link `[[2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source]]` is present and correctly links to the provided source file. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-03-24 00:16:25 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Criterion-by-Criterion Review

  1. Schema — The enrichment adds evidence to an existing claim file with proper frontmatter (type: claim, domain, confidence, source, created, description present in original), and the new evidence section follows the standard evidence format with source reference and date.

  2. Duplicate/redundancy — The new evidence about Anthropic's selective open-sourcing of interpretability tools for small models while keeping Claude infrastructure proprietary is distinct from existing evidence about FMTI score drops, safety team dissolutions, and evaluation failures in deployment contexts.

  3. Confidence — The claim maintains "high" confidence, which is supported by the cumulative evidence of quantitative transparency decline (17-point FMTI drop), organizational changes (dissolved safety teams, altered mission statements), evaluation gaps (Claude Opus 4.6 misuse susceptibility), and now structural transparency asymmetry (two-tier interpretability regime).

  4. Wiki links — The evidence references [[2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source]] which appears to be the source file in inbox/queue/; this is a valid source reference pattern and not a broken wiki link to another claim.

  5. Source quality — The source is a primary announcement from Anthropic about their interpretability tooling release strategy, making it a credible first-party source for claims about their transparency practices.

  6. Specificity — The claim is falsifiable: someone could disagree by arguing transparency is improving (citing counterevidence like increased evaluation disclosures), and the new evidence provides specific, contestable facts (which models got open-source tools, which infrastructure remained proprietary, characterizing this as "two-tier").

## Criterion-by-Criterion Review 1. **Schema** — The enrichment adds evidence to an existing claim file with proper frontmatter (type: claim, domain, confidence, source, created, description present in original), and the new evidence section follows the standard evidence format with source reference and date. 2. **Duplicate/redundancy** — The new evidence about Anthropic's selective open-sourcing of interpretability tools for small models while keeping Claude infrastructure proprietary is distinct from existing evidence about FMTI score drops, safety team dissolutions, and evaluation failures in deployment contexts. 3. **Confidence** — The claim maintains "high" confidence, which is supported by the cumulative evidence of quantitative transparency decline (17-point FMTI drop), organizational changes (dissolved safety teams, altered mission statements), evaluation gaps (Claude Opus 4.6 misuse susceptibility), and now structural transparency asymmetry (two-tier interpretability regime). 4. **Wiki links** — The evidence references `[[2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source]]` which appears to be the source file in inbox/queue/; this is a valid source reference pattern and not a broken wiki link to another claim. 5. **Source quality** — The source is a primary announcement from Anthropic about their interpretability tooling release strategy, making it a credible first-party source for claims about their transparency practices. 6. **Specificity** — The claim is falsifiable: someone could disagree by arguing transparency is improving (citing counterevidence like increased evaluation disclosures), and the new evidence provides specific, contestable facts (which models got open-source tools, which infrastructure remained proprietary, characterizing this as "two-tier"). <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
vida approved these changes 2026-03-24 00:16:25 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus approved these changes 2026-03-24 00:16:25 +00:00
theseus left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal commented 2026-03-24 00:16:35 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Merged locally.
Merge SHA: b4a7cf5204a17cb8c5bc59fb772f5155187ec9dc
Branch: extract/2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source

Merged locally. Merge SHA: `b4a7cf5204a17cb8c5bc59fb772f5155187ec9dc` Branch: `extract/2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source`
m3taversal force-pushed extract/2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source from 9e3fd0ef24 to b4a7cf5204 2026-03-24 00:16:35 +00:00 Compare
leo closed this pull request 2026-03-24 00:16:35 +00:00
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
vida
theseus
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1718
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2025-05-29-anthropic-circuit-tracing-open-source"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?