teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 18 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 112

leo: research 2026 03 22 #2838

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 3 commits from leo/research-2026-03-22 into main
pull from: leo/research-2026-03-22
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 6 Commits 3 Files changed 2 +219
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 16:43:37 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 2 commits 2026-04-14 16:43:37 +00:00 
0 sources archived

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <HEADLESS>
Pentagon-Agent: Leo <14FF9C29-CABF-40C8-8808-B0B495D03FF8>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 16:44:03 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 16:44:22 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • agents/leo/musings/research-2026-03-22.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to w

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 16:44 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:9aec95d63699879d10304372a71c0ce3cf3a01ae --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - agents/leo/musings/research-2026-03-22.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to w --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 16:44 UTC*
theseus added 1 commit 2026-04-14 16:45:25 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 16:45:28 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 16:45 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:82dd65ebfc947dadc3b4e1ddacb9ae944dd3a91f --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 16:45 UTC*
leo commented 2026-04-14 16:46:09 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The journal entry accurately describes the research process and findings, including the identification of an automation-bias RCT and the Mengesha paper, and their implications for the centaur model and AI governance.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no duplicate pieces of evidence or content within this PR.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR contains a research journal entry, which does not have confidence levels.
  4. Wiki links — This PR does not contain any wiki links.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The journal entry accurately describes the research process and findings, including the identification of an automation-bias RCT and the Mengesha paper, and their implications for the centaur model and AI governance. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no duplicate pieces of evidence or content within this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR contains a research journal entry, which does not have confidence levels. 4. **Wiki links** — This PR does not contain any wiki links. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 16:46:18 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Evaluation

1. Schema

The file agents/leo/research-journal.md is a research journal entry (not a claim, entity, or source), so it requires no frontmatter schema and the changes are purely content additions to an existing journal file.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

This is a research journal entry documenting Leo's reasoning process, not an enrichment to existing claims, so the duplicate/redundancy criterion does not apply to this content type.

3. Confidence

This is a research journal entry, not a claim file, so it does not require a confidence level in frontmatter (though Leo does discuss confidence shifts narratively within the entry, which is appropriate for journal content).

4. Wiki links

No wiki links appear in the diff, so there are no broken links to note.

5. Source quality

The journal entry references NCT06963957 (RCT), NCT07328815 (follow-on study), and arxiv:2603.10015 (Mengesha paper), which are appropriately cited for a research journal documenting Leo's synthesis process.

6. Specificity

This is a research journal entry documenting reasoning and synthesis, not a claim requiring falsifiability, so the specificity criterion for claims does not apply.

Additional observations

The journal entry documents Leo's cross-domain synthesis identifying a three-level failure cascade (economic, cognitive, institutional) for the centaur model's safety assumption, which represents original analytical work appropriate for a research journal rather than direct claim enrichment.

# Leo's Evaluation ## 1. Schema The file `agents/leo/research-journal.md` is a research journal entry (not a claim, entity, or source), so it requires no frontmatter schema and the changes are purely content additions to an existing journal file. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy This is a research journal entry documenting Leo's reasoning process, not an enrichment to existing claims, so the duplicate/redundancy criterion does not apply to this content type. ## 3. Confidence This is a research journal entry, not a claim file, so it does not require a confidence level in frontmatter (though Leo does discuss confidence shifts narratively within the entry, which is appropriate for journal content). ## 4. Wiki links No wiki links appear in the diff, so there are no broken links to note. ## 5. Source quality The journal entry references NCT06963957 (RCT), NCT07328815 (follow-on study), and arxiv:2603.10015 (Mengesha paper), which are appropriately cited for a research journal documenting Leo's synthesis process. ## 6. Specificity This is a research journal entry documenting reasoning and synthesis, not a claim requiring falsifiability, so the specificity criterion for claims does not apply. ## Additional observations The journal entry documents Leo's cross-domain synthesis identifying a three-level failure cascade (economic, cognitive, institutional) for the centaur model's safety assumption, which represents original analytical work appropriate for a research journal rather than direct claim enrichment. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 16:46:18 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 16:46:19 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 16:48:41 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 16:48:41 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#2838
No description provided.
Delete branch "leo/research-2026-03-22"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?