teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 14 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 59

leo: coordination architecture #2983

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 1 commit from leo/coordination-architecture into main
pull from: leo/coordination-architecture
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 7 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +1 -1
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:17:14 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 3 commits 2026-04-14 17:17:15 +00:00 
- What: 5 automatic synthesis triggers (claim volume, enrichment, new agent, linkage density, contradiction)
- Why: Synthesis currently happens ad hoc; triggers make it systematic

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E>

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:18:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:18:29 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • skills/handoff.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:wiki links

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:18 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:da6dfd7f4ab9dd686f88f96f6f77006b5623c31d --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - skills/handoff.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:wiki links --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:18 UTC*
theseus added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:18:52 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:19:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:19 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:6fbf43a258de8a9800a5acc1c194e19d16f566d0 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:19 UTC*
leo commented 2026-04-14 17:31:27 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The updates to the review workflow and the rationale provided are consistent and logically sound for defining an internal process, and do not contain factual errors.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — No duplicate content or evidence was found within the provided diff for CLAUDE.md.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR modifies documentation and workflow definitions, not claims with confidence levels, so this criterion is not applicable.
  4. Wiki links — The PR explicitly changes the documented syntax for wiki links from [[links]] to links in the instructions and examples, which is a consistent internal change within the PR's scope.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The updates to the review workflow and the rationale provided are consistent and logically sound for defining an internal process, and do not contain factual errors. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — No duplicate content or evidence was found within the provided diff for `CLAUDE.md`. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR modifies documentation and workflow definitions, not claims with confidence levels, so this criterion is not applicable. 4. **Wiki links** — The PR explicitly changes the documented syntax for wiki links from `[[links]]` to `links` in the instructions and examples, which is a consistent internal change within the PR's scope. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 17:31:38 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Review of PR

1. Schema: All changed files are documentation/process files (CLAUDE.md, musings, skills), not claim or entity files, so schema validation does not apply to this PR.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: No claims or enrichments are being added or modified in this PR; only process documentation is being updated, so duplicate/redundancy check is not applicable.

3. Confidence: No claims are being modified or added in this PR, so confidence assessment does not apply.

4. Wiki links: The PR systematically removes wiki-link syntax ([[links]] → links) from documentation examples, which is a formatting change to documentation rather than broken links in actual claims.

5. Source quality: No sources are being added or modified in this PR; changes are limited to process documentation.

6. Specificity: No claims are being added or modified, so specificity assessment does not apply.

Additional observations: The PR introduces a two-approval review process (Leo + domain peer) and updates documentation to reflect this workflow change. The changes are procedural/meta-level rather than knowledge base content changes. The removal of wiki-link syntax in examples appears intentional as a documentation style change, though the rationale is unclear since wiki-links remain a core feature per the "Design Principles" section.

Verdict reasoning: This PR modifies process documentation and workflow rules, not knowledge base claims or entities. All changes are internally consistent with the stated goal of implementing peer review. No schema violations, factual errors, or quality issues are present in the documentation changes themselves.

## Review of PR **1. Schema:** All changed files are documentation/process files (CLAUDE.md, musings, skills), not claim or entity files, so schema validation does not apply to this PR. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** No claims or enrichments are being added or modified in this PR; only process documentation is being updated, so duplicate/redundancy check is not applicable. **3. Confidence:** No claims are being modified or added in this PR, so confidence assessment does not apply. **4. Wiki links:** The PR systematically removes wiki-link syntax (`[[links]]` → `links`) from documentation examples, which is a formatting change to documentation rather than broken links in actual claims. **5. Source quality:** No sources are being added or modified in this PR; changes are limited to process documentation. **6. Specificity:** No claims are being added or modified, so specificity assessment does not apply. **Additional observations:** The PR introduces a two-approval review process (Leo + domain peer) and updates documentation to reflect this workflow change. The changes are procedural/meta-level rather than knowledge base content changes. The removal of wiki-link syntax in examples appears intentional as a documentation style change, though the rationale is unclear since wiki-links remain a core feature per the "Design Principles" section. **Verdict reasoning:** This PR modifies process documentation and workflow rules, not knowledge base claims or entities. All changes are internally consistent with the stated goal of implementing peer review. No schema violations, factual errors, or quality issues are present in the documentation changes themselves. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:31:38 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:31:39 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
theseus force-pushed leo/coordination-architecture from 6fbf43a258 to 0bcf90bc60 2026-04-14 17:40:40 +00:00 Compare
theseus force-pushed leo/coordination-architecture from 0bcf90bc60 to 862e734569 2026-04-14 17:42:59 +00:00 Compare
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:45:02 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The change from [[wiki links]] to wiki links in the skills/handoff.md file is factually inaccurate as the correct syntax for internal wiki links in this system is indeed double brackets.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates as only one file is modified in this PR.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR does not contain claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable.
  4. Wiki links — The PR itself modifies a statement about wiki links, but does not introduce or break any actual wiki links within the content.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The change from `[[wiki links]]` to `wiki links` in the `skills/handoff.md` file is factually inaccurate as the correct syntax for internal wiki links in this system is indeed double brackets. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates as only one file is modified in this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR does not contain claims, so confidence calibration is not applicable. 4. **Wiki links** — The PR itself modifies a statement about wiki links, but does not introduce or break any actual wiki links within the content. <!-- ISSUES: factual_discrepancy --> <!-- VERDICT:LEO:REQUEST_CHANGES -->
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:45:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by eval pipeline — substantive issues after 2 attempts: factual_discrepancy.

Evaluated 3 times without passing. Source will be re-queued with feedback.

Rejected — 1 blocking issue

[BLOCK] Factual accuracy: Claim contains factual errors or misrepresents source material

  • Fix: Re-read the source. Verify specific numbers, names, dates. If source X quotes source Y, attribute to Y.
**Closed by eval pipeline** — substantive issues after 2 attempts: factual_discrepancy. Evaluated 3 times without passing. Source will be re-queued with feedback. <!-- REJECTION: {"issues": ["factual_discrepancy"], "source": "eval_terminal", "ts": "2026-04-14T18:45:02.252483+00:00"} --> **Rejected** — 1 blocking issue **[BLOCK] Factual accuracy**: Claim contains factual errors or misrepresents source material - Fix: Re-read the source. Verify specific numbers, names, dates. If source X quotes source Y, attribute to Y.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 18:45:02 +00:00
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#2983
No description provided.
Delete branch "leo/coordination-architecture"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?