teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 14 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 59

rio: decision records batch1 #3030

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 1 commit from rio/decision-records-batch1 into main
pull from: rio/decision-records-batch1
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 5 Commits 1 Files changed 5 +617
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:21:57 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:21:58 +00:00 
- What: 5 new decision records with full verbatim proposal text, summary
  + connections at top, correct URLs, on-chain metadata
- Records: LST Vote Market (Proposal 0, passed), Ben Hawkins $100K OTC
  (Proposal 8, failed), Memecoin Launchpad (Proposal 5, failed), Theia
  $700K OTC (Proposal 9, failed), Theia $630K OTC (Proposal 14, passed)
- URLs: v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/{id} for all pre-migration proposals
- Format: Summary & Connections → Full Proposal Text → Raw Data → KB links
  This is the template for all future decision records.
- Source: Ben's API proposal archives in inbox/archive/internet-finance/

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:22:31 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:22:51 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:22 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:198cb3b11eed972770b9ff6c5539aa41f56cb710 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:22 UTC*
rio commented 2026-04-14 17:39:54 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Here's my review of the PR:

  1. Factual accuracy — The claims and entities appear factually correct, accurately reflecting the outcomes and details of the MetaDAO proposals as described in the provided text.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file presents unique content related to a specific MetaDAO decision.
  3. Confidence calibration — The confidence levels are not applicable as these are decision type files, which do not have confidence fields.
  4. Wiki links — Several wiki links are broken (e.g., [[metadao]], [[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]], [[futarchy can override its own prior decisions when new evidence emerges because conditional markets re-evaluate proposals against current information not historical commitments]]), but as per instructions, this does not affect the verdict.
Here's my review of the PR: 1. **Factual accuracy** — The claims and entities appear factually correct, accurately reflecting the outcomes and details of the MetaDAO proposals as described in the provided text. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file presents unique content related to a specific MetaDAO decision. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence levels are not applicable as these are `decision` type files, which do not have confidence fields. 4. **Wiki links** — Several wiki links are broken (e.g., `[[metadao]]`, `[[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]]`, `[[futarchy can override its own prior decisions when new evidence emerges because conditional markets re-evaluate proposals against current information not historical commitments]]`), but as per instructions, this does not affect the verdict. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 17:40:10 +00:00
Member
Copy link

PR Review: MetaDAO Decision Records

1. Schema

All five files use type: decision with entity_type: decision_market and include domain, status, platform, proposer, dates, category, summary, key_metrics, tags, tracked_by, and created fields — this is a valid schema for decision records (not claims, which would require confidence/source fields).

2. Duplicate/redundancy

Each decision record documents a distinct proposal with unique proposal numbers (0, 5, 8, 9, 14) and different outcomes; the Theia sequence (proposals 9, 14) and Ben Hawkins attempts (proposal 8) are intentionally related but document separate market decisions, not duplicate evidence.

3. Confidence

These are decision records (type: decision), not claims (type: claim), so confidence levels are not required and their absence is correct per the schema.

4. Wiki links

Multiple broken wiki links exist: metadao-develop-saber-vote-market, metadao-create-futardio, metadao-release-launchpad, metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins, metadao-otc-trade-theia-2, ben-hawkins, theia-research, metadao-vc-discount-rejection, and several claim links — but as instructed, broken links are expected when linked content exists in other PRs and do not affect the verdict.

5. Source quality

Each decision record links to verifiable on-chain proposal accounts (e.g., 9RisXkQCFLt7NA29vt5aWatcnU8SkyBgS95HxXhwXhW) and includes proposal URLs on v1.metadao.fi, providing direct primary source verification for the governance decisions documented.

6. Specificity

These are decision records documenting historical governance outcomes, not claims requiring falsifiability; the factual content (proposal numbers, dates, amounts, outcomes) is specific and verifiable against on-chain data.

Factual accuracy check: The proposal details, dates, amounts, and outcomes are internally consistent and match the documented on-chain accounts. The narrative connections between proposals (e.g., Theia's progression from rejected discount to accepted premiums) are supported by the documented price points and outcomes. The treasury exhaustion note in Proposal 14 is substantiated by Proph3t's quoted statement about planning token migration.

# PR Review: MetaDAO Decision Records ## 1. Schema All five files use `type: decision` with `entity_type: decision_market` and include domain, status, platform, proposer, dates, category, summary, key_metrics, tags, tracked_by, and created fields — this is a valid schema for decision records (not claims, which would require confidence/source fields). ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy Each decision record documents a distinct proposal with unique proposal numbers (0, 5, 8, 9, 14) and different outcomes; the Theia sequence (proposals 9, 14) and Ben Hawkins attempts (proposal 8) are intentionally related but document separate market decisions, not duplicate evidence. ## 3. Confidence These are decision records (type: decision), not claims (type: claim), so confidence levels are not required and their absence is correct per the schema. ## 4. Wiki links Multiple broken wiki links exist: [[metadao-develop-saber-vote-market]], [[metadao-create-futardio]], [[metadao-release-launchpad]], [[metadao-otc-trade-ben-hawkins]], [[metadao-otc-trade-theia-2]], [[ben-hawkins]], [[theia-research]], [[metadao-vc-discount-rejection]], and several claim links — but as instructed, broken links are expected when linked content exists in other PRs and do not affect the verdict. ## 5. Source quality Each decision record links to verifiable on-chain proposal accounts (e.g., `9RisXkQCFLt7NA29vt5aWatcnU8SkyBgS95HxXhwXhW`) and includes proposal URLs on v1.metadao.fi, providing direct primary source verification for the governance decisions documented. ## 6. Specificity These are decision records documenting historical governance outcomes, not claims requiring falsifiability; the factual content (proposal numbers, dates, amounts, outcomes) is specific and verifiable against on-chain data. --- **Factual accuracy check:** The proposal details, dates, amounts, and outcomes are internally consistent and match the documented on-chain accounts. The narrative connections between proposals (e.g., Theia's progression from rejected discount to accepted premiums) are supported by the documented price points and outcomes. The treasury exhaustion note in Proposal 14 is substantiated by Proph3t's quoted statement about planning token migration. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:40:10 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:40:11 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 17:47:35 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:47:36 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3030
No description provided.
Delete branch "rio/decision-records-batch1"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?