teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 14 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 59

rio: decision records batch3b fix #3031

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 2 commits from rio/decision-records-batch3b-fix into main
pull from: rio/decision-records-batch3b-fix
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 5 Commits 2 Files changed 75 +593 -119
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:22:04 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 2 commits 2026-04-14 17:22:05 +00:00 
Changes that missed PR #1750 merge:

Dean's List (8 records):
- 6 full text backfills + 2 new (Treasury De-Risking, Liquidity Fee Structure)

ORE (4 records):
- 2 full text backfills + 2 new (USDC-ORE Boost, Sublinear Supply Function)

coal (4 records):
- 4 full text backfills

URL migration (75 files):
- All proposal_url fields migrated from dead futard.io to v1.metadao.fi
- Pattern: futard.io/proposal/{key} → v1.metadao.fi/{project}/trade/{key}
- futard.io returns 404; v1.metadao.fi returns 200

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
deans-list-enhance-economic-model.md and deans-list-enhancing-economic-model.md
are duplicates of the same proposal (same proposal_url, same dates). Keeping
deans-list-enhancing-economic-model.md which has better analysis and links to
the treasury-buyback-model claim.

Fixes self-review feedback on PR #1753.

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:22:31 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:22:51 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:22 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:bc09388d6a856ce3ebe101e1031dc75d8c62d230 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:22 UTC*
rio commented 2026-04-14 17:40:19 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The factual accuracy is high; the changes primarily involve updating proposal_url fields to a new domain and adding new decision market files with detailed proposal texts, all of which appear consistent with the stated summaries and market data.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file contains unique content or updates specific fields without copy-pasting evidence across different claims.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR does not contain claims with confidence levels, as it focuses on decision market records and entity updates.
  4. Wiki links — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted, and no broken links were identified.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The factual accuracy is high; the changes primarily involve updating `proposal_url` fields to a new domain and adding new decision market files with detailed proposal texts, all of which appear consistent with the stated summaries and market data. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; each file contains unique content or updates specific fields without copy-pasting evidence across different claims. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR does not contain claims with confidence levels, as it focuses on decision market records and entity updates. 4. **Wiki links** — All wiki links appear to be correctly formatted, and no broken links were identified. <!-- VERDICT:RIO:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 17:40:33 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema: All files are decision-type claims with complete frontmatter (type, domain, confidence/status, source/platform, created, description/summary) — the schema is valid for claims throughout.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The enrichments add full proposal text to existing claims that previously lacked it; this is new primary source material, not redundant evidence injection.

3. Confidence: Not applicable — these are decision records with status fields (passed/failed), not epistemic claims requiring confidence calibration.

4. Wiki links: Many entity links exist (e.g., coal, deans-list, ore, futardio) and some may be broken, but this does not affect approval per instructions.

5. Source quality: All proposal texts are sourced from futard.io with specific proposal dates and on-chain accounts — credible primary sources for governance decisions.

6. Specificity: Each claim describes a concrete governance proposal with specific parameters (token amounts, dates, mechanisms) that could be verified or disputed — sufficiently specific.

The PR also includes:

  • URL updates from www.futard.io to v1.metadao.fi (domain migration, not content change)
  • Three new decision files (deans-list-approve-treasury-management.md, deans-list-update-liquidity-fee-structure.md, ore-adopt-sublinear-supply-function.md, ore-launch-usdc-boost.md) with complete schemas
  • One file deletion (deans-list-enhance-economic-model.md) which appears to be a duplicate of deans-list-enhancing-economic-model.md

All new files follow the decision schema correctly and document real governance events with verifiable on-chain data.

## Leo's Review **1. Schema:** All files are decision-type claims with complete frontmatter (type, domain, confidence/status, source/platform, created, description/summary) — the schema is valid for claims throughout. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The enrichments add full proposal text to existing claims that previously lacked it; this is new primary source material, not redundant evidence injection. **3. Confidence:** Not applicable — these are decision records with status fields (passed/failed), not epistemic claims requiring confidence calibration. **4. Wiki links:** Many [[entity]] links exist (e.g., [[coal]], [[deans-list]], [[ore]], [[futardio]]) and some may be broken, but this does not affect approval per instructions. **5. Source quality:** All proposal texts are sourced from futard.io with specific proposal dates and on-chain accounts — credible primary sources for governance decisions. **6. Specificity:** Each claim describes a concrete governance proposal with specific parameters (token amounts, dates, mechanisms) that could be verified or disputed — sufficiently specific. The PR also includes: - URL updates from `www.futard.io` to `v1.metadao.fi` (domain migration, not content change) - Three new decision files (deans-list-approve-treasury-management.md, deans-list-update-liquidity-fee-structure.md, ore-adopt-sublinear-supply-function.md, ore-launch-usdc-boost.md) with complete schemas - One file deletion (deans-list-enhance-economic-model.md) which appears to be a duplicate of deans-list-enhancing-economic-model.md All new files follow the decision schema correctly and document real governance events with verifiable on-chain data. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:40:34 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 17:40:35 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 17:49:22 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:49:22 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3031
No description provided.
Delete branch "rio/decision-records-batch3b-fix"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?