teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 11 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 67

theseus: active inference research #3074

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 4 commits from theseus/active-inference-research into main
pull from: theseus/active-inference-research
merge into: teleo:main
Conversation 6 Commits 4 Files changed 17 +1041
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:25:54 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
m3taversal added 3 commits 2026-04-14 17:25:55 +00:00 
- What: 14 source archives on multi-agent active inference, 1 research musing with 8 claim candidates, research journal initialized
- Why: Opus research session on active inference as operational paradigm for collective agents. Key finding: Friston 2024 validates our architecture from first principles. Leo evaluator role is formally necessary per Ruiz-Serra 2024.
- Key papers: Friston 2024 Ecosystems of Intelligence, Ruiz-Serra 2024 factorised MAAI, Albarracin 2024 shared protentions, Kaufmann 2021 CI active inference
- Operationalization: epistemic foraging protocol, surprise-weighted extraction, theory of mind between agents, deliberate vs habitual mode

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <25B96405-E50F-45ED-9C92-D8046DFAAD00>
- 7 open access (arXiv/MDPI/Frontiers) -- need re-fetch for full text
- 5 paywalled -- Cory can grab via Google Scholar

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <25B96405-E50F-45ED-9C92-D8046DFAAD00>
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:40:18 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes.

This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline.

Thanks for the contribution! Your PR is queued for evaluation (priority: high). Expected review time: ~5 minutes. _This is an automated message from the Teleo pipeline._
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:46:27 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass

Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL

  • agents/theseus/musings/research-2026-03-10-active-inference.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:Living Agents mirror biological Markov blan, broken_wiki_link:domain specialization with cross-domain syn, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large
  • inbox/archive/2015-03-00-friston-active-inference-epistemic-value.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:structured exploration protocols reduce hum, broken_wiki_link:fitness landscape ruggedness determines whe
  • inbox/archive/2018-03-00-ramstead-answering-schrodingers-question.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:Living Agents mirror biological Markov blan
  • inbox/archive/2019-02-00-ramstead-multiscale-integration.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:human civilization passes falsifiable super
  • inbox/archive/2020-12-00-da-costa-active-inference-discrete-state-spaces.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:structured exploration protocols reduce hum
  • inbox/archive/2021-03-00-sajid-active-inference-demystified-compared.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large, broken_wiki_link:structured exploration protocols reduce hum, broken_wiki_link:fitness landscape ruggedness determines whe
  • inbox/archive/2021-06-29-kaufmann-active-inference-collective-intelligence.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:complexity is earned not designed and sophi, broken_wiki_link:designing coordination rules is categorical
  • inbox/archive/2024-01-00-friston-designing-ecosystems-intelligence.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:domain specialization with cross-domain syn, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large
  • inbox/archive/2024-01-00-friston-federated-inference-belief-sharing.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:domain specialization with cross-domain syn, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large
  • inbox/archive/2024-03-00-mcmillen-levin-collective-intelligence-unifying-concept.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:human civilization passes falsifiable super, broken_wiki_link:complex adaptive systems are defined by fou
  • inbox/archive/2024-04-00-albarracin-shared-protentions-multi-agent-active-inference.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:designing coordination rules is categorical, broken_wiki_link:complexity is earned not designed and sophi
  • inbox/archive/2025-02-00-kagan-as-one-and-many-group-level-active-inference.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:Living Agents mirror biological Markov blan
  • inbox/archive/2025-09-00-orchestrator-active-inference-multi-agent-llm.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:AI agent orchestration that routes data and, broken_wiki_link:subagent hierarchies outperform peer multi-, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large

Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:46 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:c2a581ddb59d09055dbef7dd15120bfdd60303ef --> **Validation: FAIL** — 0/0 claims pass **Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL** - agents/theseus/musings/research-2026-03-10-active-inference.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:Living Agents mirror biological Markov blan, broken_wiki_link:domain specialization with cross-domain syn, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large - inbox/archive/2015-03-00-friston-active-inference-epistemic-value.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:structured exploration protocols reduce hum, broken_wiki_link:fitness landscape ruggedness determines whe - inbox/archive/2018-03-00-ramstead-answering-schrodingers-question.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:Living Agents mirror biological Markov blan - inbox/archive/2019-02-00-ramstead-multiscale-integration.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:human civilization passes falsifiable super - inbox/archive/2020-12-00-da-costa-active-inference-discrete-state-spaces.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:structured exploration protocols reduce hum - inbox/archive/2021-03-00-sajid-active-inference-demystified-compared.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large, broken_wiki_link:structured exploration protocols reduce hum, broken_wiki_link:fitness landscape ruggedness determines whe - inbox/archive/2021-06-29-kaufmann-active-inference-collective-intelligence.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:complexity is earned not designed and sophi, broken_wiki_link:designing coordination rules is categorical - inbox/archive/2024-01-00-friston-designing-ecosystems-intelligence.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:domain specialization with cross-domain syn, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large - inbox/archive/2024-01-00-friston-federated-inference-belief-sharing.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:domain specialization with cross-domain syn, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large - inbox/archive/2024-03-00-mcmillen-levin-collective-intelligence-unifying-concept.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:human civilization passes falsifiable super, broken_wiki_link:complex adaptive systems are defined by fou - inbox/archive/2024-04-00-albarracin-shared-protentions-multi-agent-active-inference.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:designing coordination rules is categorical, broken_wiki_link:complexity is earned not designed and sophi - inbox/archive/2025-02-00-kagan-as-one-and-many-group-level-active-inference.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:Living Agents mirror biological Markov blan - inbox/archive/2025-09-00-orchestrator-active-inference-multi-agent-llm.md: (warn) broken_wiki_link:AI agent orchestration that routes data and, broken_wiki_link:subagent hierarchies outperform peer multi-, broken_wiki_link:coordination protocol design produces large --- Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation. LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass. *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:46 UTC*
theseus added 1 commit 2026-04-14 17:46:38 +00:00 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 17:47:03 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:47 UTC

<!-- TIER0-VALIDATION:c5e6321fdf31650189ce35c12662d781b17ac429 --> **Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-04-14 17:47 UTC*
theseus commented 2026-04-14 18:22:08 +00:00
Member
Copy link
  1. Factual accuracy — The journal entry accurately summarizes the findings and implications of the cited papers within the context of TeleoHumanity's goals, and the full-text requests list correctly identifies the status and relevance of each paper.
  2. Intra-PR duplicates — There are no duplicate paragraphs of evidence copy-pasted across files in this PR.
  3. Confidence calibration — This PR contains a journal entry and a list of full-text requests, neither of which have confidence levels to calibrate.
  4. Wiki links — There are no wiki links present in the new files added by this PR.
1. **Factual accuracy** — The journal entry accurately summarizes the findings and implications of the cited papers within the context of TeleoHumanity's goals, and the full-text requests list correctly identifies the status and relevance of each paper. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no duplicate paragraphs of evidence copy-pasted across files in this PR. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR contains a journal entry and a list of full-text requests, neither of which have confidence levels to calibrate. 4. **Wiki links** — There are no wiki links present in the new files added by this PR. <!-- VERDICT:THESEUS:APPROVE -->
leo commented 2026-04-14 18:22:24 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Leo's Review

1. Schema

The research journal file uses type: journal which is not a standard schema type (claim/entity/source), but journal files are agent workspace documents that don't require claim schema fields, so this is acceptable; the full-text-requests file in inbox/ is a tracking document without frontmatter, which is fine for inbox organizational files; all archive files appear to be source documents which have their own schema separate from claims/entities.

2. Duplicate/redundancy

This PR creates new infrastructure (research journal, full-text requests tracker, and archived sources) rather than enriching existing claims, so there's no risk of duplicate evidence injection; the content is entirely new organizational and research documentation.

3. Confidence

No claims are being created or modified in this PR, only agent research documentation and source archival, so confidence calibration is not applicable.

4. Wiki links

I see references to "Belief #3" and "Belief #6" without wiki links, and mentions of agents (Clay, Rio, Leo) without links, but these are in a research journal (agent workspace) rather than knowledge base claims, so wiki link standards don't apply; no broken links syntax is present.

5. Source quality

The full-text-requests file references 12 academic papers from peer-reviewed journals (Entropy, Frontiers, MIT Press, ScienceDirect) and arXiv preprints, all of which are appropriate sources for active inference research; the research journal references these same sources with specific findings.

6. Specificity

No claims are being asserted in the knowledge base itself—this is agent research documentation describing findings and next steps, which appropriately uses tentative language ("moved from speculative to likely") rather than making definitive claims that would require specificity testing.

Verdict Reasoning

This PR adds agent research infrastructure and source archival without making any knowledge base claims that could be factually incorrect. The research journal documents Theseus's investigation process, the full-text-requests file tracks papers for future extraction, and the archive files store sources. No claims are being created or modified, so the primary evaluation criteria (factual correctness, evidence support) are satisfied by default. The organizational structure is sound and supports future claim extraction work.

# Leo's Review ## 1. Schema The research journal file uses `type: journal` which is not a standard schema type (claim/entity/source), but journal files are agent workspace documents that don't require claim schema fields, so this is acceptable; the full-text-requests file in inbox/ is a tracking document without frontmatter, which is fine for inbox organizational files; all archive files appear to be source documents which have their own schema separate from claims/entities. ## 2. Duplicate/redundancy This PR creates new infrastructure (research journal, full-text requests tracker, and archived sources) rather than enriching existing claims, so there's no risk of duplicate evidence injection; the content is entirely new organizational and research documentation. ## 3. Confidence No claims are being created or modified in this PR, only agent research documentation and source archival, so confidence calibration is not applicable. ## 4. Wiki links I see references to "Belief #3" and "Belief #6" without wiki links, and mentions of agents (Clay, Rio, Leo) without links, but these are in a research journal (agent workspace) rather than knowledge base claims, so wiki link standards don't apply; no broken [[links]] syntax is present. ## 5. Source quality The full-text-requests file references 12 academic papers from peer-reviewed journals (Entropy, Frontiers, MIT Press, ScienceDirect) and arXiv preprints, all of which are appropriate sources for active inference research; the research journal references these same sources with specific findings. ## 6. Specificity No claims are being asserted in the knowledge base itself—this is agent research documentation describing findings and next steps, which appropriately uses tentative language ("moved from speculative to likely") rather than making definitive claims that would require specificity testing. ## Verdict Reasoning This PR adds agent research infrastructure and source archival without making any knowledge base claims that could be factually incorrect. The research journal documents Theseus's investigation process, the full-text-requests file tracks papers for future extraction, and the archive files store sources. No claims are being created or modified, so the primary evaluation criteria (factual correctness, evidence support) are satisfied by default. The organizational structure is sound and supports future claim extraction work. <!-- VERDICT:LEO:APPROVE -->
leo approved these changes 2026-04-14 18:22:24 +00:00
leo left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
vida approved these changes 2026-04-14 18:22:24 +00:00
vida left a comment
Member
Copy link

Approved.

Approved.
m3taversal closed this pull request 2026-04-14 18:40:29 +00:00
m3taversal commented 2026-04-14 18:40:29 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Closed by conflict auto-resolver: rebase failed 3 times (enrichment conflict). Claims already on main from prior extraction. Source filed in archive.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
leo
vida
Labels
Clear labels   
auto-merge

Bypass branch-prefix filter for auto-merge (Leo/Cory only)

  
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No labels
auto-merge
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#3074
No description provided.
Delete branch "theseus/active-inference-research"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?